• Recommended Sites & Links
  • About

Dare Something Worthy Today Too!

~ FreeCryptoBitCoins, Cryptocurrency, BitCoin, Ethereum, BitCoin Cash, Ethereum Classic, LiteCoin, DogeCoin, Gold & Precious Metals, Investing & Investments, Stocks and Stock Markets, Financial Markets & Market Timing, Technical Analysis, Oil and Energy Markets, Hard Assets Investing, BlockChain, Airdrops, Earn Free Bitcoin…

Dare Something Worthy Today Too!

Category Archives: 2008 Election

Supreme Court Asked To Halt Tuesday’s Election!

03 Monday Nov 2008

Posted by jschulmansr in 2008 Election, Barack Obama, Finance, id theft, Investing, investments, Joe Biden, John McCain, Latest News, Markets, Politics, Presidential Election, Sarah Palin, U.S. Dollar, Uncategorized

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

2008 Election, Barack Obama, birth certificate, citizenship, District Court, kenya, legally qualified, Presidential Election 2008, qualified, Supreme Court, U.S. Citizen, u.s. constitution

ELECTION 2008
Supremes asked to halt Tuesday’s vote
Constitutional crisis feared over Obama’s ‘qualifications’


Posted: October 30, 2008
11:00 pm Eastern© 2008 WorldNetDaily

 

The U.S. Supreme Court is being asked to help the nation avoid a constitutional crisis by halting Tuesday’s election until Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama documents his eligibility to run for the top office in the nation.

Democratic attorney Philip Berg had filed a lawsuit alleging Obama is ineligible to be president because of possible birth in Kenya, but as WND reported, a federal judge dismissed the complaint claiming Berg lacks standing to bring the action.

The 34-page memorandum that accompanied the court order from Judge R. Barclay Surrick concluded ordinary citizens can’t sue to ensure that a presidential candidate actually meets the constitutional requirements of the office.

Instead, Surrick said Congress could determine “that citizens, voters, or party members should police the Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the Presidency,” but that it would take new laws to grant individual citizens that ability.

“Until that time,” Surrick says, “voters do not have standing to bring the sort of challenge that Plaintiff attempts to bring.”

Berg has maintained that uncertainty about how the U.S. does enforce the requirements of presidency may result in a constitutional crisis should an ineligible candidate win the office.

In a statement today, Berg said he is applying to Justice David Souter for an “Immediate Injunction to Stay the Presidential Election of November 4, 2008.”

“I am hopeful that the U.S. Supreme Court will grant the injunction pending a review of this case to avoid a constitutional crisis by insisting that Obama produce certified documentation that he is or is not a “natural born” citizen and if he cannot produce documentation that Obama be removed from the ballot for president,” Berg said.

“We must legally prevent Obama, the unqualified candidate, from taking the office of the presidency of the United States,” Berg said.

The issue of Obama’s eligibility first got traction among Internet bloggers and later was heightened when several campaigns were launched to determine whether a “certificate of live birth” posted on the Internet by the Obama campaign was valid.

The issue gained more attention when Berg told radio talk show icon Michael Savage he had an admission from Obama’s grandmather that she was at his birth – in Kenya.

“This is a question of who has standing to stand up for our Constitution,” Berg told Jeff Schreiber of America’s Right blog. “If I don’t have standing, if you don’t have standing, if your neighbor doesn’t have standing to ask whether or not the likely next president of the United States – the most powerful man in the entire world – is eligible to be in that office in the first place, then who does?”

As WND reported, Berg filed suit in U.S. District Court in August, alleging Obama is not a natural-born citizen and is thus ineligible to serve as president of the United States. Berg demanded that Obama provide documentation to the court to verify that the candidate was born in Hawaii, as Obama contends, and not in Kenya, as Berg believes.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • More
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...

Obama Economics: The Future of Investments & The Economy Under a President Obama

28 Tuesday Oct 2008

Posted by jschulmansr in 2008 Election, Barack Obama, commodities, Copper, deflation, Finance, gold, hard assets, inflation, Investing, investments, Joe Biden, John McCain, Latest News, Markets, mining stocks, oil, Politics, precious metals, Presidential Election, Sarah Palin, silver, Today, U.S. Dollar, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on Obama Economics: The Future of Investments & The Economy Under a President Obama

Tags

agricultural commodities, alternate energy, Austrian school, banking crisis, banks, bear market, bear stearns, bull market, capitalism, central banks, commodities, communism, Copper, deflation, depression, diamonds, dollar denominated, dollar denominated investments, economic, economic trends, economy, financial, futures, futures markets, gold, gold miners, hard assets, heating oil, inflation, investments, market crash, Markets, mining companies, natural gas, oil, palladium, physical gold, platinum, platinum miners, precious metals, price, price manipulation, prices, producers, production, protection, recession, risk, run on banks, safety, silver, silver miners, socialism, sovereign, spot, spot price, stagflation, timber, U.S. Dollar, volatility, Water

Obama Economics: The Future of Investments & The Economy under a President Obama

By: Robert Nabloid of Nabloid.com

At the time of writing this, Obama has not yet been elected, but that is only because the vote has yet to take place. In just a few weeks (on Tuesday November 4, 2008), Obama will become the first half-minority man to be President of the United States of America. The US, and the World, will cheer and it will all happen under much fanfare. We all know of Obama by now. We know he makes great speeches and talks a whole lot about change. But what change does he have in mind? The problem I have noticed is that not many of his supporters seem to understand all the changes he intends to make. Obama often speaks about a world that almost sounds utopian… but how does he intend to build this utopia? How does he intend to pay for this utopia? The devil is often in the details.

The changes Obama implements will have an affect on both the economy (your jobs) and your investments (your retirement). I believe many of the changes he implements will also change American society forever (long after he is gone) by creating a society that believes it deserves a good living by default, instead of a society that works hard to earn a good living. So pay attention to Obamanomics. The most important changes Obama will implement deal with the economy; without a strong economy, Obama will not have the finances in place to afford many of his other social programs. So, I will focus this article on his economic and tax policies which will have an enormous affect on the economy and your investments, as well as the government coffers.

Before I start, remember why the USA became a free nation to begin with… due to the taxes imposed on Americans by the British Throne, which became excessive and caused a revolt. In the last century, the USA became the greatest nation on Earth. It has its share of problems, but it still became #1 on the planet! A commoner could become its wealthiest and most successful with enough hard work, determination and a little bit of luck. This ability to transcend social classes from being poor to being rich, has made America ripe with opportunities. Millions of immigrants, often highly educated and motivated, come from around the world to the USA in order to make a better life for themselves. Many come from 3rd world nations, dictatorships and socialist/communist countries, so they can live in a free market country that affords them many opportunities for a better life. This freedom is precious and critical in creating a healthy environment for economic development and prosperity.

I must ask you a few questions now: If you lived in a country where more than half of your earnings go to the government automatically or you’re jailed, would you consider yourself free? If you lived in a country where you are unable to protect yourself, are you free? If you won the lottery and you’re government automatically took MORE THAN HALF, would you consider yourself free?

Okay, so by now you’re just itching for me to get down to it. I think the American work ethic and creativity helped create one of the finest societies on the planet. I also think Obama will wage a war on the American work ethic and a war on successful people. Please read “The Audacity of Deceit: Barrack Obama’s War on American Values”. It’s funny that many parents want their kids to go to medical school or law school, to get good jobs. Why bother? Under Obama these professionals will suffer and be discouraged with tax rates above 50%! Why go through all the extra effort (and debt for schooling), only to be punished by your hard work and success with punitive taxes that leave you with less than half of what you actually earned?

Below is a great list of ten tax changes Obama wishes to implement, quoted from “The Audacity of Deceit: Barrack Obama’s War on American Values”. Below each change, I have left my comment.

1) Increase the top individual tax rate from 35 percent to 39.6 percent.

It could cost the economy billions! This still takes money out of the pockets of successful people and puts it into Obama’s hand so he can spend it, because government doesn’t spend enough money? I think people should be entitled to keep their hard earned dollars and 35% is more than enough for the government to take. Remember, that money would be spent on assets of one type or another (like investments in the economy or houses/boats/consumer goods/etc) and it DOES get circulated back into the economy in an efficient manner by consumers! This is why capitalism has worked so well! The government often waists money in poorly run social programs and money grabs for special interest groups. This will decrease efficiency in the economy and is nothing more than a government transfer of wealth. Let’s create more inefficiencies?!? C’mon… but it gets much worse.

2) Raise the capital gains tax rate from 15 percent to 28 percent.

This is an absolutely horrible idea! Capital gains taxes are incurred on investments! Many millions of Americans have a plan to retire. They have put money into investments so the investments could go up in value enough to afford the luxuries of retirement, without depending on social security. Now only 72% of your profits are actually profits. If you needed $1 million to retire, you will now need your investment returns to be even higher to afford retirement! Do we not want people to be successful and self-sufficient? This is impeding the ability of many to be self-sufficient.

Many companies may not invest in the USA as much because of the inherent capital gains. This will also hurt the stock market. We should be encouraging people to save money and invest, not discourage them! I believe a 0% tax rate on capital gains would spur a LOT of investment in the USA, and a lot of jobs!

3) Increase the stock dividends rate from 15 percent to 39.6 percent.

This is just plain dumb! Stock dividends are one of the primary ways retiree’s earn money! If a retiree was able to find investments yielding 10% per year in dividends, than the retiree would only need a portfolio of $250,000 to earn $25,000 in dividends. Of that amount the retiree would get to keep $21,250 after taxes. Under Obama, that same retiree is all of a sudden forced to take a massive pay cut and live off of $15,100! This hurts the stock market, retirees, and the economy in general. This is really stupid. We should encourage people to invest in companies, not discourage them! This is only discouraging investment in America, once again.

4) Raise the percentage of Americans who pay no federal income tax from 40 percent to 50 percent.

Why, in a time with massive deficits, should more burden be placed on fewer Americans? The social programs are not free! Someone must work for, earn, and pay for these social programs. The same low and lower-middle class families that are voting FOR these programs should bear some of costs! If they believe so highly in the programs, they should be willing to put their money where their mouth is and take it on the chin, especially if its such a good idea and helps people out!

5) Impose a 10 percent surtax on all incomes above $250,000 per year.

Surtaxes on success? My, oh my. Shit, I think we should impose a heavy surtax on anyone who earns less than $15,000… pretty quickly I bet you would see a whole lot of people earning more than $15,000 that didn’t use to… that might actually help more people than it hurts! Want an efficient economy? Placing surtax on success is stupid.

6) Raise the death tax rate to 55 percent for any income past the first $1 million exemption.

With many homes being worth over a million (at least by the time many of us die they probably will be if you think about inflation!), a 55% tax rate is almost abusive. Once again, why save money if it’s going to be heavily taxed when you die? This is one of the worst, as it will cause many successful families to move A LOT of assets OFFSHORE to avoid taxes altogether. Why invest in the USA when it looks like it’s going in the wrong direction? Before there was a little bit of stigma attached to rich people moving assets offshore to avoid taxes. Under a heavy taxes (above 50%!) it would only be smart to move all assets offshore, and there might be a stigma for those that don’t! (Why wouldn’t they, do you think they are stupid? If they want to give money to charity, I’m sure many of them worked their entire lives for that money, and would like the ability to choose (democracy!) where there money goes). I assure you, many families will move assets off shore to avoid the wacky Obama taxes altogether.

Many other nations will now try and lure these wealthy families to come to (and invest in) their nations. If America doesn’t appreciate the middle class, middle-upper class, and upper class, I assure you, another nation will!

7) Raise the minimum wage from $6.55 to $9.50.

Inflation anyone? The cost of everything will rise to pay for this increase. It’s almost a zero sum game for the minimum wage earners and it can only hurt the rest of society with inflation. We don’t need this because American workers aren’t competitive enough on the world stage as it is. LOL, So let’s raise the minimum wage even more, so we can’t compete on ANYTHING. Hopefully all businesses and capital (money) will move elsewhere.

8 ) Raise social security payments by 4 percent for individuals, businesses, or anyone who makes $250,000 per year.

Why even comment on this? More social security? If people don’t earn it, they shouldn’t get it. I agree with having social security for those tough times when people lose jobs/get sick, etc. But should we allocate even more money to social security? We should want social security to help put food on the table, but not give each person a life so comfortable they don’t attempt to go out and get a job if they are able to do so! It should be an uncomfortable time when a person is not productive, and the discomfort should be great enough that the person strives to do all he/she can do to become productive to society once again!

9) Increase the top tax rate from 37.9 percent to 54.9 percent for self-employed taxpayers (who already pay ordinary income taxes as well as self-employment taxes).

Why be self-employed or go out and create a business? There’s just no point to risking your money to start a business. Not only are you hit with massive taxes on earnings, but if you do happen to create a business and eventually decide to sell, the capital gains taxes take a large chunk of the value of the business you created. It’s a massive disincentive to create businesses based in the USA. Now how are American businesses supposed to effectively compete with foreign competitors (with wage slaves) when much of the profit is sucked away to government coffers instead of re-invested into the business? Businesses normally either re-invest the profits into the business or give the dividends to shareholders, but with less actual profits… less spending on new technologies, expansion, job creation, etc.

10) Increase the tax rate on Sub-chapter S corporations (small businesses) by up to 15.3 percent (from a top rate of 35 percent to 50.3 percent).

Another tax rate above 50%. Instantly, almost overnight, many corporations will have to reduce any expansion plans they did have, as much of the profit they were going to re-invest is now in the government coffers instead of the corporations bank accounts. All this WHILE there is a credit crunch? C’mon, I thought Obama would want MORE jobs, not less. Why should companies even put a head office in the USA anymore? It doesn’t make sense anymore with disincentives like this.

 

How can the USA consider itself a free country when it has lost so many of its constitutional rights? Now the right for a person to work hard and enjoy the fruits of his/her labour may disappear under heavy taxes. When more than 50% of your hard earned dollars go to the government, it is NOT a free country! I contend that in a free nation, a government does not take MORE THAN HALF of your earned dollars.

I thought this was interesting: Even Russia is doing a better job at some things than the US. If I didn’t tell you what country it is that is doing the below tax rates, you would never guess:

  • The tax system in Russia underwent a comprehensive reform in the year 2001. This reform is designed, in principle, to ease the tax burden on individuals and companies and to simplify the classes of payments for national insurance.
  • Russia has a uniform rate of tax on the income of individuals. As of 2008 tax in Russia is payable at the rate of 13% for an individual on most income. (non-residents 30%). Russian residents pay 9% on dividend income. (Deduction at source). Non-residents pay 15% on dividend income.
  • Exemptions are granted to certain income earners.
  • The standard rate of Russia corporate tax in 2008 is 24%.
  • http://www.worldwide-tax.com/russia/russia_tax.asp

If American’s don’t appreciate their successful citizens and the government’s real role in society, there will be consequences. The government has made most of the major problems, including the legislation that ultimately created the housing bubble. Governments can seldom manage their own finances, and yet they want to take MORE of your money out of your hands and “efficiently” transfer the wealth around? It doesn’t work that way, especially when they plan on transferring wealth from productive peoples to unproductive ones… that in and of itself creates inefficiencies.

Here’s what I think will happen. Obama will introduce all his new taxes during a recession. He will make things worse, but will get no blame for it, as most people will blame the previous government for the entire recession. Businesses will get hurt by higher minimum wages (and HIGH inflation!!) which make them even less competitive with other nations around the world, further increasing the need for outsourcing. The businesses that do manage to remain profitable will get slammed by higher taxes, which means less profit to re-invest in the business, the economy, and the owners pockets (shareholder’s often include pension funds, and individual investors retirement accounts!). A lot of baby boomer’s that wanted to retire will no longer be able to do so, due to higher taxes on their investments, income and combined with lower stock prices thanks to both the tax policies and the recession.

Obama will then go on to introduce many of his social programs that will create an entire generation of Americans who expect the government to take care of them. So as government is bringing in less money due to a recession and stupid tax policies, it will begin to spend more. The dollar will suffer. National debt will continue to sky rocket into the stratosphere. America will be less competitive.

Meanwhile, the rest of the world will be split. Some nations will follow the lead of the Americans and create very socialist societies, while the other nations that see the errors, will capitalize (pun intended) on America’s mistakes and try and lure the capital, head offices, and assets of American families and corporations. If America doesn’t want the corporations and wealthy families, another nation will. All this will occur, because as many people forget, government did not make the USA powerful and successful, it merely laid the foundation for the PEOPLE to make it successful. Other nations can lay that same foundation and corporations and people will move!

I love America, but I hate the road its going down and can no longer invest my money in America until this socialist agenda is stopped. That’s right. I will NO LONGER invest in America as long as things are headed down such a bumpy road. I hope to one day be able to begin investing in America again, but that won’t happen until America goes back to the constitution and realizes what governments role should be.

Take the Obama Test and see if you agree or disagree with Obama’s policies. He does great speeches on change, and change can be good (or bad)… but change has to be defined!! Right now most American’s badly want change, but I fear they will vote for a change they do not fully understand. At least take a look at the specific changes he will implement before voting, then make an informed decision about whether he is going to implement the changes you want or not. Oh, what’s the use… we already know he won the second he showed his face, regardless of his policies. At least this article might show some of the consequences to his economic policies. Obama is a socialist, bad for business, investments and the middle class.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • More
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...

Share the Wealth / Wealth Redistibution – A New Definition!

27 Monday Oct 2008

Posted by jschulmansr in 2008 Election, Barack Obama, commodities, deflation, Finance, gold, hard assets, inflation, Investing, investments, Joe Biden, John McCain, Jschulmansr, Markets, mining stocks, oil, Politics, precious metals, Presidential Election, psychology, Sarah Palin, silver, U.S. Dollar, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on Share the Wealth / Wealth Redistibution – A New Definition!

Tags

agricultural commodities, alternate energy, Austrian school, banking crisis, banks, bear market, bear stearns, Biden, bull market, capitalism, central banks, commodities, communism, Copper, deflation, depression, diamonds, dollar denominated, dollar denominated investments, economic, economic trends, economy, Election 2008, financial, futures, futures markets, gold, gold miners, hard assets, heating oil, inflation, investments, market crash, Markets, mccain, mining companies, natural gas, obama, oil, Palin, palladium, physical gold, platinum, platinum miners, precious metals, Presidential Election, price, price manipulation, prices, producers, production, protection, recession, risk, run on banks, safety, Share The Wealth, silver, silver miners, socialism, sovereign, spot, spot price, stagflation, timber, U.S. Dollar, volatility, Water, wealth, Wealth Redistribution

Subject: Redistribution of Wealth

Today on my way to lunch I passed a homeless guy with a sign that read
“Vote Obama, I need the money.”… I laughed.
   

Once in the restaurant my server had on a “Obama 08” tie, again I laughed
as he had given away his political preference… just imagine the coincidence.
When the bill came I paid cash but decided not to tip the server and explained
to him that I was exploring the Obama redistribution of wealth concept. He stood
there in disbelief while I told him that I was going to redistribute his tip to someone
who I deemed more in need (the homeless guy outside).
The server angrily stormed from my sight.
I went outside, gave the homeless guy $10 and told him to thank the server inside
as I decided you could use the money more than him. The homeless guy was happy…
and I felt like a successful politician.
 At the end of my rather unscientific redistribution experiment I realized
the homeless guy was grateful for the money he did not earn,
but the waiter was pretty angry that I gave away the money he did earn
even though the recipient clearly needed money more than him.

 

 

I guess redistribution of wealth is easier to swallow in concept than in
practical application!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LOL TOO FUNNY! – jschulmansr

Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • More
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...

WorldNetDaily: Obama ‘admits’ Kenyan birth?

23 Thursday Oct 2008

Posted by jschulmansr in 2008 Election, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, John McCain, Latest News, Presidential Election, Sarah Palin, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on WorldNetDaily: Obama ‘admits’ Kenyan birth?

Tags

alien, attorney general, Barak Obama, birth certificate, citizen, democrat, elections, forgery, fraud, hawaii, illegal, Joe Biden, John McCain, kenya, mccain, obama, Presidential Election 2008, proof, Sarah Palin, u.s. constitution, voter fraud

Obama Crimes – This is Philip J. Berg’s Website

WorldNetDaily: Obama ‘admits’ Kenyan birth? Campaign doesn’t respond to claims in lawsuit over birth certificate

Thursday, 23 October 2008 21:05 administrator
 

October 21, 2008 | By Drew Zahn | © 2008 WorldNetDaily 

Pennsylvania Democrat Philip J. Berg, who filed a lawsuit demanding Sen. Barack Obama present proof of his American citizenship, now says that by failing to respond Obama has legally “admitted” to the lawsuit’s accusations, including the charge that the Democratic candidate was born in Mombosa, Kenya.

As WND reported, Berg filed suit in U.S. District Court in August, alleging Obama is not a natural-born citizen and is thus ineligible to serve as president of the United States. Though Obama has posted an image of a Hawaii birth certificate online, Berg demands that the court verify the original document, which the Obama campaign has not provided.

Now Berg cites Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which states that unless the accused party provides written answer or objection to charges within 30 days, the accused legally admits the matter.

Since Obama has only filed motions to dismiss and has not actually answered the charges in the lawsuit, Berg claims, according to Rule 36, Obama has legally admitted he is not a natural-born citizen.

Now Berg is asking the court for a formal declaration of Obama’s admission and asking the Democratic National Committee for another presidential candidate.

In a statement released today, Berg argues that he filed Requests for Admissions on Sept. 15, meaning Obama had until Oct. 15 to answer or face the consequences of Rule 36.

“Obama and the DNC ‘admitted,’ by way of failure to timely respond to Requests for Admissions, all of the numerous specific requests in the Federal lawsuit,” Berg’s statement reads. “Obama is ‘not qualified’ to be president and therefore Obama must immediately withdraw his candidacy for president and the DNC shall substitute a qualified candidate.”

Complete article at WorldNetDaily.com

POST COMMENTS 

 

Last Updated ( Thursday, 23 October 2008 22:04 )

 

Phil J. Berg files motions to expedite resolution in Berg v.. Obama

Thursday, 23 October 2008 14:29 administrator
E-mail Print

Plaintiff Phil J. Berg filed two motions today seeking an expedited resolution in Berg v. Obama. (PDF’s of the motions are attached below.)

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE

This motion argues that the facts have been established that Barack Obama is not constitutionally qualified to be elected or serve as President of the United States, and that the Court should issue a summary judgment as follows:

  • That Barack Hussein Obama a/k/a Barry Hussein Obama a/k/a Barack Dunham a/k/a Barry Dunham a/k/a Barack Soetoro a/k/a Barry Soetoro is not a “natural born” or “naturalized” United States citizen.
  • That he is ineligible to run for and/or serve as President of the United States.
  • That the Democratic National Committee be enjoined from naming Barack Hussein Obama, et al as the Democratic Presidential Candidate on the ballot.
  • That the Democratic National Committee and Barack Hussein Obama, et al are enjoined from any further campaigning on behalf of Barack Hussein Obama, et al for Office of the Presidency.
  • That Barack Hussein Obama’s, et al name be removed from any and all ballots for the Office of the President of the United States.

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION REQUESTING AN EXPEDITED RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

This motion requests that the court:

  • Grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
  • Order that Defendants Response to Plaintiff=s Motion is to be filed and served upon Plaintiff by a specified date.
  • Order that a Ruling, Hearing and/or Resolution be set for a specific date.
Attachments:
File Description File size
Download this file (Motion for Expedited Ruling,Hearing, or Resolution re Summary Judgment Motion 10)Motion for Expedited Ruling,Hearing, or Resolution re Summary Judgment Motion 10   76 Kb
Download this file (Obama, Plaintiff\'s Motion for Summary Judgment against Obama and the DNC.pdf)Obama, Plaintiff\’s Motion for Summary Judgment against Obama and the DNC.pdf   250 Kb
Add Comment (98)
Hits: 1753

Last Updated ( Thursday, 23 October 2008 15:14 )

 

Press Release: Obama & DNC admit all allegations in Berg v. Obama

Tuesday, 21 October 2008 11:05 administrator
E-mail Print

Obama & DNC Admit All Allegations of Federal Court Lawsuit – Obama’s “Not” Qualified to be President

Obama Should Immediately Withdraw his Candidacy for President

For Immediate Release: – 10/21/08 – Complete contact details and pdfs of this press release and motions filed by plaintiff Berg today are at the end of this article

(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 10/21/08) – Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that Obama and tbe DNC “ADMITTED”, by way of failure to timely respond to Requests for Admissions, all of the numerous specific requests in the Federal lawsuit. Obama is “NOT QUALIFIED” to be President and therefore Obama must immediately withdraw his candidacy for President and the DNC shall substitute a qualified candidate. The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.

Berg stated that he filed Requests for Admissions on September 15, 2008 with a response by way of answer or objection had to be served within thirty [30] days. No response to the Requests for Admissions was served by way of response or objection. Thus, all of the Admissions directed to Obama and the DNC are deemed “ADMITTED.” Therefore, Obama must immediately withdraw his candidacy for President.

OBAMA – Admitted: 

1. I was born in Kenya. 2. I am a Kenya “natural born” citizen. 

3. My foreign birth was registered in the State of Hawaii. 4. My father, Barrack Hussein Obama, Sr. admitted Paternity of me. 

5. My mother gave birth to me in Mombosa, Kenya. 6. My mother’s maiden name is Stanley Ann Dunham a/k/a Ann Dunham. 

7. The COLB [Certification of Live Birth] posted on the website “Fightthesmears.com” is a forgery. 8. I was adopted by a Foreign Citizen. 

9. I was adopted by Lolo Soetoro, M.A. a citizen of Indonesia. 10. I was not born in Hawaii. 

11. I was not born at the Queens Medical Center in Hawaii. 12. I was not born at Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Hawaii. 

13. I was not born in a Hospital in Hawaii. 14. I am a citizen of Indonesia. 

15. I never took the “Oath of Allegiance” to regain my U.S. Citizenship status. 16. I am not a “natural born” United States citizen. 

17. My date of birth is August 4, 1961. 18. I traveled to Pakistan in 1981 with my Pakistan friends. 

19. In 1981, I went to Indonesia on my way to Pakistan. 20. Pakistan was a no travel zone in 1981 for American Citizens. 

21. In 1981, Pakistan was not allowing American Citizens to enter their country. 22. I traveled on my Indonesian Passport to Pakistan. 

23. I renewed my Indonesian Passport on my way to Pakistan. 24. My senior campaign staff is aware I am not a “natural born” United States Citizen. 

25. I am proud of my Kenya Heritage. 26. My relatives have requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my first name. 

27. My relatives have requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my last name. 28. My relatives have requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my place of birth. 

29. I requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my first name. 30. I requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my last name. 

31. I requested changes to the portion of my birth certificate that identifies my place of birth. 32. The document identified as my Indonesian School record from Fransiskus Assisi School in Jakarta, Indonesia is genuine. 

33. I went to a Judge in Hawaii to have my name changed. 34. I went to a Senator and/or Congressman or other public official in Hawaii to have my name changed. 

35. I had a passport issued to me from the Government of Indonesia. 36. The United States Constitution does not allow for a Person to hold the office of President of the United States unless that person is a “natural born” United States citizen. 

37. I am ineligible pursuant to the United States Constitution to serve as President and/or Vice President of the United States. 38. I never renounced my citizenship as it relates to my citizenship to the country of Indonesia.

39. I never renounced my citizenship as it relates to my citizenship to the country of Kenya. 40. I am an Attorney who specializes in Constitutional Law. 

41. Kenya was a part of the British Colonies at the time of my birth. 42. Kenya did not become its own Republic until 1963.

43. I am not a “Naturalized” United States Citizen. 44. I obtained $200 Million dollars in campaign funds by fraudulent means. 

45. I cannot produce a “vault” (original) long version of a birth certificate showing my birth in Hawaii. 46. My “vault” (original) long version birth certificate shows my birth in Kenya.

47. The only times I was to a Hospital in Hawaii was for check-ups or medical treatments for illnesses. 48. Queens Medical Center in Honolulu, Hawaii does not have any record of my mother, Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama) giving birth to me.

49. Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Honolulu, Hawaii does not have any record of my mother, Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama) giving birth to me. 50. I was born in the Coast Province Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya. 

51. I represented on my State Bar application in Illinois that I never used any other name other than Barack Hussein Obama. 52. I went by the name Barry Soetoro in Indonesia. 

53. My Indonesian school records are under the name of Barry Soetoro. 54. I took an Oath to uphold the United States Constitution when admitted to the State Bar of Illinois to practice Law. 

55. I took an Oath to uphold the United States Constitution when I was Sworn into my United States Senate Office. 56. I hold dual citizenship with at least one other Country besides the United States of America.

DNC – Admitted: 

1. The DNC nominated Barrack Hussein Obama as the Democratic Nominee for President. 2. The DNC has not vetted Barrack Hussein Obama. 

3. The DNC did not have a background check performed on Barrack Hussein Obama. 4.The DNC did not verify Barrack Hussein Obama’s eligibility to serve as President of the United States. 

5. The DNC admits Barrack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya.6. The DNC admits Barrack Hussein Obama is not a “natural born” United States citizen.

7. The DNC admits Barrack Hussein Obama was not born in Hawaii. 8.The DNC admits they have not inquired into Barrack Hussein Obama’s citizenship status.

9. The DNC admits they have a duty to properly vette the Democratic Nominee for President. 10.The DNC admits Lolo Soetoro, M.A., an Indonesian citizen adopted Barrack Hussein Obama.

11. The DNC admits the Credentials Committee has been aware of this lawsuit since August 22, 2008 as the lawsuit was faxed to our Washington D.C. Office on August 22, 2008.
12. The DNC admits their Credentials Committee failed to verify and/or inquire into the credentials of Barack Hussein Obama to serve as the President of the United States. 

13. The DNC admits their Credential Committee’s Report failed to address the issues of Barack Hussein Obama’s ineligibility to serve as President of the United States. 14.The DNC admits Howard Dean, Chair Person has and had knowledge Barack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya and ineligible to serve as the President of the United States. 

15. The DNC admits Plaintiff and all Democratic citizens of the United States have been personally injured as a result of not having a qualified Democratic Presidential Nominee to cast their votes upon. 16. The DNC admits Plaintiff and all citizens of the United States have a Constitutional Right to vote for the President of the United States and to have two (2) qualified candidates of which to choose from. 

17. The DNC admits Plaintiff and all citizens of the United States have a Constitutional right to have a properly vetted Democratic Presidential Nominee of which to cast their vote.18. The DNC admits an FBI background check is not performed on the Presidential or Vice Presidential Candidates. 

19. The DNC admits the United States Constitution does not allow for a Person to hold the office of President of the United States unless that person is a “natural born” United States citizen.20. The DNC admits they collected donations on behalf of Barack Hussein Obama for his Presidential campaign.

21. The DNC admits Plaintiff and Democratic citizens donated money based on false representations that Barack Hussein Obama was qualified to serve as the President of the United States. 22. The DNC admits if Barack Hussein Obama is elected as President and allowed to serve as President of the United States in violation of  our Constitution, it will create a Constitutional crisis.

23. The DNC admits Barack Hussein Obama took an Oath to uphold the United States Constitution. 24. The DNC admits allowing a person who is not a “natural born” citizen to serve as President of the United States violates Plaintiff’s rights to due process of law in violation of the United States Constitution.

25. The DNC admits allowing a person who is not a “natural born” citizen to serve as President of the United States violates Plaintiff’s rights to Equal Protection of the laws in violation of the United States Constitution.26. The DNC admits the function of the DNC is to secure a Democratic Presidential Candidate who will protect Democratic citizen’s interests, fight for their equal opportunities and fight for justice for all Americans. 

27. The DNC admits the Democratic National Committee has been promoting Barack Hussein Obama’s Presidential election knowing he was ineligible to serve as President of the United States.

Our website obamacrimes.com now has 50.7 + million hits. We are urging all to spread the word of our website – and forward to your local newspapers, radio and TV stations. Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, “we” the people, are heading to a “Constitutional Crisis” if this case is not resolved forthwith.Philip J. Berg, Esquire
555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12
Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531
Cell (610) 662-3005
(610) 825-3134
(800) 993-PHIL [7445]
Fax (610) 834-7659
philjberg@obamacrimes.com This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it  
 

Attachments:
File Description File size
Download this file (Motion for Expedited Ruling on Plaintiff\'s Motion for Order re Req. for Admissi)Motion for Expedited Ruling on Plaintiff\’s Motion for Order re Req. for Admissi   67 Kb
Download this file (Obama, Motion for Order deeming Request for Admissions Admitted.pdf)Obama, Motion for Order deeming Request for Admissions Admitted.pdf   227 Kb
Download this file (ObamaCrimes.com Press Release 10 21 08 - Obama - DNC Admit All Allegationsof Fed)Press Release Obama – DNC Admit All Allegations of Federal Court Lawsuit.   85 Kb
Add Comment (618)
Hits: 8466

Last Updated ( Tuesday, 21 October 2008 12:01 )

 

Open Comments – Thursday Morning 10-23-08

Thursday, 23 October 2008 11:54 administrator
E-mail Print
Please leave comments not related to a particular article here.
Add Comment (189)
Hits: 2660

 

Interview with Phil J. Berg

Sunday, 19 October 2008 23:55 administrator
E-mail Print

Webster Griffin Tarpley inteviewed Phil J. Berg in August about the Berg v. Obama case. A number of things have happened since this interview, nevertheless it clearly lays out the basics of the lawsuit.

Listen to “Obama may not even be legally eligible for US presidency.”

Mr. Tarpley has written a number of political books including two books on Barack Obama, “Obama: the Postmodern Coup” and “Barack H. Obama: The UNauthorized Biography”. His books are available at Amazon.com.

 

 

Add Comment (40)
Hits: 565

 

More Articles…
  • Berg v. Obama continues to be ignored in the “media”
  • Fox Toledo News airs Berg v. Obama story
  • New video posted at You Tube details the issues in Berg v. Obama
  • Berg response in oppostion to Obama / DNC protective order

Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • More
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...
Newer posts →

Authors

  • jschulmansr's avatar jschulmansr
    • Free Crypto!
    • Free Crypto Currency
    • This is Blessed!
    • Trump Rally Charleston
    • Trump Rally Charleston

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Dare Something Worthy Today Too!
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Dare Something Worthy Today Too!
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d