• Recommended Sites & Links
  • About

Dare Something Worthy Today Too!

~ FreeCryptoBitCoins, Cryptocurrency, BitCoin, Ethereum, BitCoin Cash, Ethereum Classic, LiteCoin, DogeCoin, Gold & Precious Metals, Investing & Investments, Stocks and Stock Markets, Financial Markets & Market Timing, Technical Analysis, Oil and Energy Markets, Hard Assets Investing, BlockChain, Airdrops, Earn Free Bitcoin…

Dare Something Worthy Today Too!

Category Archives: Currency and Currencies

Kinross Gold Leads Gold Sector Rebound – Seeking Alpha

10 Wednesday Dec 2008

Posted by jschulmansr in Bollinger Bands, commodities, Copper, Currency and Currencies, diamonds, Finance, Fundamental Analysis, gold, hard assets, inflation, Investing, investments, Latest News, Markets, mining stocks, oil, precious metals, silver, small caps, Stocks, Technical Analysis, Today, U.S. Dollar, uranium

≈ Comments Off on Kinross Gold Leads Gold Sector Rebound – Seeking Alpha

Tags

agricultural commodities, alternate energy, Austrian school, banking crisis, banks, bear market, Bollinger Bands, bull market, capitalism, central banks, China, Comex, commodities, communism, Copper, Currencies, currency, deflation, depression, diamonds, dollar denominated, dollar denominated investments, economic, economic trends, economy, financial, Forex, futures, futures markets, gold, gold miners, hard assets, heating oil, India, inflation, investments, Keith Fitz-Gerald, market crash, Markets, mining companies, Moving Averages, natural gas, oil, palladium, Peter Schiff, physical gold, platinum, platinum miners, precious metals, price, price manipulation, prices, producers, production, protection, rare earth metals, recession, risk, run on banks, safety, Saudi Arabia, Sean Rakhimov, silver, silver miners, socialism, sovereign, spot, spot price, stagflation, Technical Analysis, timber, U.S. Dollar, volatility, warrants, Water

Kinross Gold Leads Gold Sector Rebound – Seeking Alpha

By: Sam Kirtley of Gold-prices.biz

Sam Kirtley has been involved in investment in the financial markets for a number of years and has experience in stock investment and analysis as well as options trading. He is now a writer and analyst for various websites including uranium-stocks.net, gold-prices.biz, and silver-prices.net.

Gold stocks have been bouncing back recently, but few can challenge the extraordinary recovery of Kinross Gold (KGC), which has more than doubled since its low below $7. This is a sign that KGC is indeed one of the best gold mining companies in the world, since it has bounced back the furthest and the fastest.

(click to enlarge)

Technically some good signs from KGC are that the Relative Strength Index is moving higher having bounced up off the oversold zone at 30. Similarly, the MACD is trending northwards and is now in positive territory, but can still rise a lot further before giving an oversold signal.

If one is to have favourite shares, Kinross Gold Corp would certainly be one of ours, as it has been a holding of ours for years now, although we have traded the ups and downs when the opportunities presented themselves.

Having originally acquired Kinross at $10.08, after a large rally Kinross then went through a bit of a pull back so we signalled to our readers to “Add To Holdings” at discounted levels of around $11.66. We also gave another ‘Kinross Gold BUY’ signal when we purchased more of this stock on the 20th August 2007 for $11.48. On 31st January, 2008, we reduced our exposure to this stock when we sold about 50% of our holding for an average price of $21.96 locking in a profit of about 93.60%. On the 24th July, 2008, we doubled our holding with a purchase at $18.28 giving us a new average purchase price of $14.50.

As well as trading the stock, we have also dabbled in options contracts with Kinross, buying call options in KGC on the 16th June, 2008, paying $2.68 per contract and selling them on the 28th June 2008 for $5.30 per contract generating a 100% profit in two weeks. We then re-purchased them after they dropped for $2.50, and we are still holding them, although at a significant paper loss.

The reason we like Kinross Gold Corp so much is that it fits our criteria almost perfectly. When we look for a gold stock to buy, we are looking for solid fundamentals, a stable geopolitical situation and most importantly, leverage to the gold price itself.

As far as the fundamentals go, Kinross is a mid to large cap gold producer with a market cap of $9.47 billion. Some may consider this too large a company to offer decent leverage to the gold price, but as shown by the recent performance of the stock price, Kinross is definitely providing that leverage.

As well as leverage to rising gold prices, Kinross is also growing well as a company in its own right. Having made a gross profit of $390.40M in 2006 and then $501.80M in 2007 and with the Sep 08 quarterly profits at $269.80M, Kinross appears to be on track for another good year of record profits. There is also something in the financials that is particularly helpful in the present credit environment. In the last report from KGC, out of the $1284.80M in current assets, Kinross has a massive $322.90M in cash. This means it is well positioned to face any liquidity issues and will not be forced to try and raise money in the current difficult credit conditions.

Therefore, we continue to like Kinross and maintain our stock and option position in the company. Kinross Gold Corp is not only well positioned to benefit from rising gold price, but it is also a great company in its own right, with good growth potential. A full list of the stocks we cover can be found in our free online portfolio at http://www.gold-prices.biz.biz.

=============================================

Goldcorp Expected to Get 40% Gold and Silver Reserve Boost at Penasquito

Source: Financial Post Trading Desk

By: Jonathan Ratner

 Goldcorp provided an update for the Penasquito project in Mexico on Monday, a day ahead of its tour for analysts and shareholders.

The miner said its capital cost estimate is less than 10% higher than the original estimate of US$1.494-billion and construction continues to progress well.

When engineering work is complete, Goldcorp expects an approximate increase of 30% in gold reserves and a 15% to 20% increase in silver, lead and zinc reserves for year-end reporting.

There is also the potential for initial resources to be declared for bulk mineable and high-grade underground zones, as well as the Noche Buena property nearby, noted Canaccord Adams analyst Steven Butler. He assumes reserve additions will be roughly 40% for gold and silver and around 16% for lead and zinc.

Concentrate shipments are scheduled to being in the fourth quarter of 2009 and commercial production is expected for the following quarter. Meanwhile, shipments of large trial lots are anticipated in 2009 now that concentrate samples have been provided to select smelters, Mr. Butler said in a research note.

The analyst also noted that Goldcorp’s optimization efforts are underway. They include the possibility of recovering precious metals from low-grade lead ore that was previously considered uneconomic, the potential for underground bulk mining beneath currently defined open pits, and the possibility of cheaper power from a dedicated facility through a partnership with an independent provider.

Canaccord rates Goldcorp a “buy” with a price target of US$32 per share.

Jonathan Ratner 

<!–
–>========================================

The Fed Still Manipulates Gold and The Markets

By: Jake Towne of Yet Another Champion of the Constitution

In a dynamic duo of articles published last weekend, I predicted the fall of the Dollar via a Gold-based perspective, and a US Treasury-based perspective. I want to round off and perhaps even reinforce my theory with a few more opinions and thoughts, which of course may be faulty as the major decisions are still at the mercy and discretion of the Fed, whom I have learned to never underestimate. To be a real “expert” in economics today requires one to be an “expert” in predicting government interventions, so it is all guesswork unless one is an insider. I am highly interested if there are any crucial facts I am missing by the way, please leave any counterarguments below.

I own some gold and if gold goes down I’ll buy some more and if gold goes up I’ll buy some more. Gold during the course of the bull market, which has several more years to go, will go much higher. – Jim Rogers, famed commodities trader, last week

I have written previously how the Fed creates and destroys money, but the example I used of open market operations (OMOs) has changed dramatically in 2008. The Fed is, on a daily basis, still altering its Treasury holdings, but more importantly propping up other assets by buying them, such as mortgage-based securities, Citigroup (C), AIG, etc. The Fed balance sheets have plunged from its historical levels of ~95% Treasury securities to less than 32% Treasuries, which hampers OMOs since the assets purchased will likely find no willing buyer on the market.

It may seem like the Fed is creating lots of money (and they are) but remember that $7.76 trillion, $8.5 trillion, WHATEVER the new number will be by the end of this week, pales in comparison to the amount of financial derivatives in existence, which per the BIS at last count (and just over-the-counter!) was $684 trillion. I am not sure if I ever wrote this phrase in this column before, but I’ve always viewed the financial crisis as a “Triple-D” crisis. Dollar. Debt. Derivatives.

There is another method of money destruction that I have not overlooked and want to mention. In an economic “disintegration” or a monster of a recession, money can also be destroyed by corporate, government and private bankruptcies.

In the debt-based world we live in, I think money destruction could be seen in shocking scales far exceeding the imaginations of the Keynesian-economics-based minds of the Fed and other central bankers. For instance, comparatively there has been much less noise in the commercial mortgage markets. However, if a lot of businesses fail, which has been known to happen in any recession, how do you suppose those mortgages will be repaid to the banks? In such a scenario, central bankers have just two options: create replacement money to re-inflate supply, or revalue the currency to an asset (very likely gold, after all central bankers do not hold at least some gold for their collective health, the yellow stuff is nice life insurance for fiat currency, ain’t it?).

In this eye-popping December 4 essay by James Conrad, he reasons the central bankers will revalue to some sort of a gold standard to escape oblivion, and the price of gold will go from $750 per ounce to $7500-9000. [Remember the “price” is not REALLY going up, after all 1 ounce of gold is the same from day to day. What it really means is that all fiat currencies are going to be massively devalued as the worthless scraps of paper and electrons they really are!]

There is a legal requirement that, in every futures contract that promises to deliver a physical commodity, the short seller must be 90% covered by either a stockpile of the commodity or appropriate forward contracts with primary producers… Things, however, are changing fast. As previously stated, the first major mini-panic among COMEX gold short sellers happened last Friday. As of Wednesday morning, about 11,500 delivery demands for 100 ounce ingots were made at COMEX, which represents about 5% of the previous open interest. Another 2,000 contracts are still open, and a large percentage of those will probably demand delivery. These demands compare to the usual ½ to 1% of all contracts.

Time for Captain Calculator! On December 5, the open interest was 264,796 contracts (at 100 troy ounces per bar). This equates to 823 tonnes, a very significant amount equal to about 10% of the total gold reserves claimed by the United States, the world’s largest holder. There are 26.5 million ounces in contracts and only 2.9 million ounces in COMEX warehouses to cover deliveries as Dr. Fekete notes here. Over 40% of the warehouse totals will be delivered before January 1.

Where is the gold to cover the rest of the contracts? In the ground? In central bank vaults? At the GLD London vault? I do not know the answer, but I agree with Fekete’s comment on gold’s recent backwardation and Conrad, the traders requesting delivery are skeptical there is enough.

Conrad then proceeds to outline a very convincing (to me) proof that ends with:

It is only a matter of time before gold is allowed to rise to its natural level. Assuming that about half of the current increase in Fed credit is eventually neutralized, the monetized value of gold should be allowed to rise to between $7,500 and $9,000 per ounce as the world goes back to some type of gold standard. In the nearer term, gold will rise to about $2,000 per ounce, as the Fed abandons a hopeless campaign to support COMEX short sellers, in favor of saving the other, more productive, functions of the various banks and insurers.

Revaluation of gold, and a return to the gold standard, is the only way that hyperinflation can be avoided while large numbers of paper currency units are released into the economy. This is because most of the rise in prices can be filtered into gold. As the asset value of gold rises, it will soak up excess dollars, euros, pounds, etc., while the appearance of an increased number of currency units will stimulate investor psychology, and lending and economic output will increase, all over the world. Ben Bernanke and the other members of the FOMC Committee must know this, because it is basic economics.

 

Hyperinflation is nasty stuff. I first wrote about it in my July article “Calling All Wheelbarrows: Hyperinflation in America? (Part 2/2)” and a fellow Nolan Chart columnist, Republicae, with far more experience than I wrote “The Hyper-Inflationary Trigger.”

Jim Sinclair, precious metals expert, comments here:

I recently completed the same mathematics that helped me so much in 1980 to determine the price that would be required to balance the international balance sheet of the US.

Balancing the international balance sheet is gold’s mission in times of crisis.

I recently did the math again and was sadly shocked to see what the price of gold would have to be to balance the international balance sheet of the USA today. That price for gold is more than twice Alf’s projected maximum gold price.

 

Alf Field’s maximum projection is $6,000 per troy ounce. Wow, guess Captain Calculator can take a vacation! On that note I would like to end with a reminder to the republican, Republican, and the third person who is reading this:

“We renew our allegiance to the principle of the gold standard and declare our confidence in the wisdom of the legislation of the Fifty-sixth Congress, by which the parity of all our money and the stability of our currency upon a gold basis has been secured.”

– Republican National Platform, 1900

“We believe it to be the duty of the Republican Party to uphold the gold standard and the integrity and value of our national currency.”

– Republican National Platform, 1904

“The Republican Party established and will continue to uphold the gold standard and will oppose any measure, which will undermine the government’s credit or impair the integrity of our national currency. Relief by currency inflation is unsound and dishonest in results.”

– Republican National Platform, 1932 [Above are sourced from H.L. Mencken, A New Dictionary of Quotations on Historical Principles from Ancient and Modern Sources (1985, p. 471)

“We must make military medicine the gold standard for advances in prosthetics and the treatment of trauma and eye injuries.”

– the only mention of gold in the Republican National Platform, 2008. Try searching for ‘gold’ or ‘dollar’ here.

Well, the Gold Standard ended in the US in 1914 when the first unbacked and “unsound” Federal Reserve Notes were printed. Ok, I hate the Fed, but fellow columnist Gene DeNardo phrased it best in his intriguing article “MV=PT A Classic Equation and Monetary Policy“:

When the economy grows in a healthy way, we all share in the profit as our currency becomes stronger and is able to purchase more.

========================================

Inflation on Sale as Deflation Dominates Markets

By:  Eric Roseman of  The Sovereign Society

The time to start building fresh positions in oil, gold, silver and TIPs has arrived. Even distressed real estate should be accumulated if credit can be secured.

Over the next 6-12 months the United States, Europeans, Japanese and Chinese will eventually arrest deflation. And long before that materializes, hard assets will begin a major reversal following months of crippling losses.

Since peaking in July, the entire gamut of inflation assets has collapsed amid a growing threat of deflation or an environment of accelerated price declines. The last deflation in the United States occurred in the 1930s, purging household balance sheets, corporations, states, municipalities and even the government following two New Deals.

Thus far, U.S. CPI or the consumer price index has not turned negative year-over-year. Yet as oil prices continue to lose altitude and other commodities have been crushed, input costs and price pressures continue to decline dramatically since October. The only major component of CPI that continues to post modest year-over-year gains is wages. And with unemployment now rising aggressively this quarter it’s highly likely wage demands will also come to a screeching halt.

Plunging Bond Yields Discount Danger

In the span of just six months, foreign currencies (except the yen), commodities, stocks, non-Treasury debt, real estate and art have all declined sharply in value in the worst panic-related sell-off in decades. More than $10 trillion dollars’ worth of asset value has been lost worldwide in 2008.

What’s working since July? U.S. Treasury bonds and the U.S. dollar as investors scramble for safety and liquidity.

On December 5, 30-day and 60-day T-bills yielded just 0.01% – the lowest since the 1930s while the benchmark 10-year T-bond traded below 2.55% – its lowest yield since Eisenhower was president in 1955. Even 30-year bonds have surged as the yield recently dropped below 3% for the first time in more than four decades.

The market is now pricing a severe recession and – possibly – another Great Depression. Despite a series of formidable regular market interventions by central banks since August 2007, the credit crisis is still alive and kicking. The authorities have not won the battle …at least not yet.

Heightened inter-bank lending rates, soaring credit default swaps for sovereign government debt and plunging Treasury yields all confirm that the primary trend is still deflation.

To be sure, credit markets worldwide have improved markedly since the dark days of early October. Investment-grade corporate debt is rallying, commercial-paper is flowing again and companies are starting to issue debt once more – but only the highest and most liquid of companies. For the most part, banks are still hoarding cash and borrowers can’t obtain credit.

The real economy is now feeling the bite as consumption falls off a cliff, foreclosures soar and the unemployment rate surges higher. These primary trends are deflationary as broad consumption is severely curtailed, with consumers preparing for the worst economy since 1981 and rebuilding devastated household balance sheets.

But at some point over the next 12 months, the market might transition from outright deflation or negative consumer prices to some sort of disinflation or at least an environment of stable prices. That’s when inflation assets should start rallying again.

Inflate or Die: The Name of the Game in 2009

The battle now being waged by global central banks, including the Federal Reserve is an outright attack on deflation. Through the massive expansion of credit, the Fed and her overseas colleagues are on course to print money like there’s no tomorrow to finance bulging fiscal spending plans, bailouts, tax cuts and anything else that helps to alleviate economic stress.

Earlier in November, the Fed announced it would target “quantitative easing” and “monetization,” unorthodox monetary policy tools rarely or never used in the post-WW II era.

Without getting too technical, the term “quantitative easing” means the Fed will act as the buyer of last resort to monetize Treasury debt and other government agency paper in an attempt to bring interest rates down. Quantitative easing aims to flood the financial system with liquidity and absorb excess cash through monetization or purchasing of government securities.

Through monetary policy, the Fed controls short-term lending rates but cannot influence long-term rates that are largely set by the markets; the Fed now hopes it can influence long-term rates through quantitative easing. And since its announcement two weeks ago, long-term fixed mortgage rates have declined sharply.

These and other open market operations directed by the Fed and Treasury will eventually arrest the broad-based deflation engulfing asset prices. It will take time. Inflation is the desired goal and is the preferred evil to deflation, a monetary phenomenon that threatens to destroy or seriously compromise the financial system. Policy-makers have studied the Great Depression, including Fed Chairman Bernanke, and the consequences of failed central bank and government intervention in times of severe economic duress are unthinkable.

Ravenous Monetary Expansion

According to Federal Reserve Board data, the Fed is now embarking on a spectacular expansion of credit unseen in the history of modern financial markets.

Lichtensteins Banner

The total amount of Federal Reserve bank credit has increased from $800 billion dollars to $2.2 trillion dollars (or from 6% to 15% of gross domestic product) as the central bank expands its various liquidity facilities in an attempt to preserve normal functioning of the financial system.

The Fed’s ongoing operations to arrest falling prices are targeted namely at housing – the epicenter of this financial crisis. It is highly unlikely that the United States economy will bottom until housing prices find a floor. Quantitative easing hopes to stabilize this market.

Buy Gold Now

Relative to other assets in 2008, gold prices have declined far less. The ongoing liquidity squeeze has forced investors to dump assets, including gold to raise dollars. I suspect this short-term phenomenon will end in 2009 once the ongoing panic subsides and credit markets become largely functional again.

Gold should be accumulated now ahead of market stabilization. As the financial system gradually comes back to life over the next several months or sooner, the dollar should commence another period of weakness; there will be little incentive to hold dollars with short-term rates at or close to zero percent. The Fed will be in no hurry to raise lending rates.

Still, the Japanese experience in the 1990s warns investors of the travails of long-term deflation.

The Japanese, unlike the United States, only started to seriously attack falling prices in the economy in 1998 through massive fiscal spending. In contrast, the U.S. is already throwing everything at the crisis after just 17 months.

I expect the United States to print its way out of misery and, over time, and conquer deflation. But the cost will be humungous and at the expense of the dollar, U.S. financial hegemony and calls for a new monetary system anchored by gold.

It’s literally “inflate or die” for global central banks. Inflation will win.

My Note: If you haven’t START BUYING PRECIOUS METALS NOW! Especially GOLD -I AM!    jschulmansr

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • More
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...

Gold (H)edges Gold Stocks + New CBOE Gold and Silver Options

09 Tuesday Dec 2008

Posted by jschulmansr in capitalism, commodities, Copper, Currency and Currencies, deflation, Finance, Fundamental Analysis, gold, hard assets, inflation, Investing, investments, Latest News, Markets, mining stocks, oil, precious metals, silver, small caps, Stocks, Technical Analysis, U.S. Dollar, Uncategorized, uranium

≈ Comments Off on Gold (H)edges Gold Stocks + New CBOE Gold and Silver Options

Tags

agricultural commodities, alternate energy, Austrian school, banking crisis, banks, bear market, Bollinger Bands, bull market, capitalism, central banks, China, Comex, commodities, communism, Copper, Currencies, currency, deflation, depression, diamonds, dollar denominated, dollar denominated investments, economic, economic trends, economy, financial, Forex, futures, futures markets, gold, gold miners, hard assets, heating oil, India, inflation, investments, Keith Fitz-Gerald, market crash, Markets, mining companies, Moving Averages, natural gas, oil, palladium, Peter Schiff, physical gold, platinum, platinum miners, precious metals, price, price manipulation, prices, producers, production, protection, rare earth metals, recession, risk, run on banks, safety, Saudi Arabia, Sean Rakhimov, silver, silver miners, socialism, sovereign, spot, spot price, stagflation, Technical Analysis, timber, U.S. Dollar, volatility, warrants, Water

Gold (H)edges Gold Stocks – Features and Interviews – Hard Assets Investor

By: Brad Zigler of Hard Assets Investor

This is an excellent teaching article- jschulmansr

I suppose I shouldn’t have been surprised by the number of visitors to the San Francisco Hard Assets Conference who wanted to talk about wrestling the risk of their gold stock investments. After all, 2008 has turned out brutal for gold miners. Witness the AMEX Gold Miners Index off by 46% for the year.

Some of the conferees have been puzzling over their hedging options. And there are plenty of them: options, futures and exchange-traded notes, to name a few. This array leaves many wondering which hedge is optimal.

If you’re pondering that question yourself, you first have to ask yourself just what risk you want to hedge. In a so-called “perfect” hedge, price risk is completely checked, effectively locking in the present value of an asset until the hedge is lifted.

Is that what you really want, though?

A less-than-perfect hedge neutralizes only a portion of the risk subsumed within an investment. Gold stocks, for example, provide exposure to both the gold and equity markets. Hedging a gold stock with an instrument that derives its value solely from gold may dampen the volatility impact of the metal market upon your portfolio, but leaves you with equity risk. This may be perfectly acceptable if you feel stocks in general – and your issues in particular – are likely to appreciate. Hedge out the gold exposure and you’re more likely to see the value that the company’s management adds. If any.

We touched on this subject in recent Desktop columns (see “Gold Hedging: Up Close And Personal” and “More On Hedging Gold Stocks“).

More than one Desktop reader asked why the articles proposed a hedge strategy employing inverse gold exchange-traded notes – namely, the PowerShares DB Gold Double Short ETN (NYSE Arca: DZZ) – instead of stock-based derivatives such as options on the Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF (NYSE Arca: GDX).

Well, we’ve mentioned one of the advantages of a gold-based hedge already, but the question deserves a more detailed answer. Let’s suppose, for illustrative purposes, you hold 1,000 shares of a gold mining issue now trading at $50 and are concerned about future downside volatility. [Note: The prices shown in the illustrations below are derived from actual market values.]

AMEX Gold Miners Index And ETF

The AMEX Gold Miners Index is a modified market-capitalization-weighted benchmark comprised of 33 publicly traded gold and silver mining companies.

While price movements in the index are generally correlated with the fluctuations of its components and other mining issues, the relationship isn’t perfect. Close, but not perfect. The Gold Miners Index represents the market risk, or beta, specific to gold equities. Any hedge that employs an index-based derivative will need to be beta-adjusted to compensate for any differences in the securities’ volatilities.

You have to consider the proper index-based derivative to be used in the hedge. The GDX exchange-traded fund could be shorted, but that would require the use of margin, something that some investors might abhor.

If you’re not put off by margin, you’ll first need to size your hedge. And for that, you’ll need a beta coefficient for your stock. A quick-and-dirty beta can be approximated by taking the quotient of the securities’ volatilities or standard deviations (you can get a stock’s standard deviation through Web sites such as Morningstar and SmartMoney, or you can derive a beta more formally through a spreadsheet program such as Excel).

Gold Stock Volatility ÷ ETF Volatility = 94.8% ÷ 81.8% = 1.16

The ratio tells you how to calculate the dollar size of your hedge. If your stock is trading at $50, your $50,000 position would require $58,000 worth of GDX shares sold short. If GDX is $23 a copy, that means you‘ll need to short 2,522 shares.

Once hedged, you’ll still carry residual risk. The volatility correlation could shift over the life of the trade, leaving you over- or underhedged. So you’ll need to monitor the position for possible adds or subtractions. Hedging is not a “get it and forget it” proposition.

You’ll also need fresh capital to place and maintain the hedge. There’s the initial cash requirement of $29,000 (50% of $58,000) and possibly more if you hold your hedge through significant rises in GDX’s price.

GDX Options

You can avoid margin altogether by using certain GDX options instead of a short sale. Purchasing puts on GDX, for example, gives you open-ended hedge protection against declines in gold equities like a GDX short sale but with a clearly defined and limited risk. There’s no margin required, but you’ll have to pay a cash premium to buy the insurance protection. And, like an insurance contract, the coverage is time-limited.

Let’s say you can purchase a one-month option that permits you to sell 100 GDX shares, at $22 a copy, for a premium of $245. Keep in mind that the put conveys a right, not an obligation. You’re not required to sell GDX shares. At any time before expiration, you can instead sell your put to realize its current value, or you can allow the option to expire if it’s not worth selling.

Just how does the put protect you? Let’s imagine that, just before expiration, GDX shares have fallen to $10. Your put guarantees you the right to sell GDX shares at a price that’s now $12 better than the current market. That’s what your option should be worth: $12 a share, or $1,200. If you sell it now, you’d realize a $955 gain that can be used to offset any concomitant losses on your gold stock.

To figure out how many puts are necessary to fully hedge your stock position, you’ll need to extend the ratio math used previously.

Option prices only move in lockstep with their underlying stocks when they’re “in the money” like the put illustrated above. The expected change in an option premium is expressed in the delta coefficient. If the delta of the $22 put, when GDX is $23, is .40, the option premium is expected to appreciate by 40 cents for every $1 GDX loses.

The arithmetic used to construct the full hedge is:

[Stock Value ÷ (Delta x 100 Shares)] x Beta = [$50,000 ÷ (.40 x 100)] x 1.16 = 1,450 puts

Here’s where the efficacy of the GDX options hedge really breaks down. GDX’s high price volatility has inflated the cost of hedge protection to impractical levels. The hedge would cost $245 x 1,450, or $355,250; much more than the potential loss that would be incurred if you remained unprotected. Clearly, the cost of hedging gold equity market risk, like the cost of insurance after a catastrophe, has been puffed up to protect the insurer.

Of course, you can elect to hedge only a portion of your stock position, but the high premium necessitates a large “deductible” on your market risk.

Wrapping Up

You’ll note that some gold mining issues have options themselves. Using these as hedges in the current market presents another set of problems.

Given that the volatilities for individual issues are higher than that of GDX, the stock contracts are even more expensive than index options. Using stock options, too, would hedge away management alpha. Individual options, as well, are inefficient if you hold multiple mining issues in portfolio.

Now, consider the contrasting benefits attached to using the DZZ double inverse gold notes in your hedge: 1) no overpriced insurance cover, 2) you get to keep your stock’s equity and management risk; you’re only hedging out gold’s volatility, 3) a single purchase can hedge any number of mining issues in portfolio, and 4) your insurance doesn’t expire.

Seems to me that DZZ has the edge.

===============================================

Today’s Grab Bag- Brad Ziegler Hard Assets Investor

Cheaper Oil and Silver + Gold Options 

Real-time Inflation Indicator (per annum): 7.9%

A couple of quick items for your consideration this morning.

Merry New Year from the EIA

The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) has issued its monthly short-term forecasts for oil prices. In the words of this little corner of sunshine in the Department of Energy:

 “The current global economic slowdown is now projected to be more severe and longer than in last month’s Outlook, leading to further reductions of global energy demand and additional declines in crude oil and other energy prices.”

The EIA has set an average price forecast for West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil at $100 per barrel. That’s the average for all of 2008. Keep in mind that, year-to-date, WTI has traded at an average barrel price of about $104. Now, we’ve only got 15 trading days left in 2008. To bring the current average price down $4 in that time, the sell-off pace has to quicken some.

In essence, the EIA – if you put any faith in its forecasts – is telling you to short oil. And this while the quarterly NYMEX oil contango has ballooned to a record $7.21 a barrel (need background on contango? See “Oil Demand Perking Or Peaking?”).

 NYMEX Crude Oil Quarterly Contango 

NYMEX Crude Oil Quarterly Contango

Back in November, the EIA eyed a $112 average price for 2008. Do I need to tell you that they missed the mark on that one?

Looking ahead, the EIA thinks WTI crude will average $51 a barrel in 2009.

Never let it be said that your stingy government didn’t give you something for the holidays.

And now, ladies and gentlemen, SLV options

Frustrated that you haven’t been able to play your favorite option trades in the silver market? Be vexed no longer. The Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) has come to your rescue. Yesterday, CBOE launched option trading on two metals grantor trusts, the iShares COMEX Gold Trust (NYSE Arca: IAU) and the iShares Silver Trust (NYSE Arca: SLV). Both trusts hold physical metals.

This is both a first and a “two-fer” for the options bourse. Back in June, CBOE inaugurated trading in the SPDR Gold Shares Trust (NYSE Arca: GLD); options on a silver grantor trust haven’t been traded on an organized exchange before.

The American-style options will trade on the January expiration cycle, initially with contracts maturing in December, January, April and July.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • More
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...

Time to Revise Our Gold Expectations – Seeking Alpha

08 Monday Dec 2008

Posted by jschulmansr in Bollinger Bands, capitalism, commodities, Copper, Currency and Currencies, deflation, Finance, Fundamental Analysis, gold, hard assets, Investing, investments, Latest News, Markets, mining stocks, precious metals, silver, small caps, Stocks, Technical Analysis, Today, U.S. Dollar, uranium

≈ Comments Off on Time to Revise Our Gold Expectations – Seeking Alpha

Tags

agricultural commodities, alternate energy, Austrian school, banking crisis, banks, bear market, Bollinger Bands, bull market, capitalism, central banks, China, Comex, commodities, communism, Copper, Currencies, currency, deflation, depression, diamonds, dollar denominated, dollar denominated investments, economic, economic trends, economy, financial, Forex, futures, futures markets, gold, gold miners, hard assets, heating oil, India, inflation, investments, Keith Fitz-Gerald, market crash, Markets, mining companies, Moving Averages, natural gas, oil, palladium, Peter Schiff, physical gold, platinum, platinum miners, precious metals, price, price manipulation, prices, producers, production, protection, rare earth metals, recession, risk, run on banks, safety, Saudi Arabia, Sean Rakhimov, silver, silver miners, socialism, sovereign, spot, spot price, stagflation, Technical Analysis, timber, U.S. Dollar, volatility, warrants, Water

Time to Revise Our Gold Expectations – Seeking Alpha

Source: FP Trading Desk

The price of gold is showing signs of stability after gold stocks got crushed in the commodity sell-off early this fall. However, we are clearly not in the $1000-plus gold price environment many had anticipated under these dire economic conditions, nor have traditional multiples returned, says Credit Suisse analyst Anita Soni.

Apart from a brief period earlier this year, when gold hit an all-time high above $1030 an ounce, the yellow metal has not performed true to course. The first quarter advance proved to be a bubble with large-scale institutional speculators driving the price sharply higher… and then sharply lower over the next seven months, according to Jeffrey Nichols, managing director at American Precious Metals Advisors.

Mr. Nichols told the China Gold & Precious Metals Summit in Shanghai on Thursday:

In spite of the lack of direction and day-to-day price volatility in the gold market this year, at least we can say that no other asset class has held its value quite so well.

“Clearly the standard 1 to 2 times price-to-net asset value [NAV] paradigm no longer applies, particularly for the more junior stocks,” Ms. Soni said in a research note, adding that exposure to base metal by-products is no longer a guarantee of lower cash costs. For senior producers, P/NAV multiples are around 0.5 times, while they range for 0.66x for mid-tier names and as much as 1x for small market cap companies.

Until longer-term valuation fundamentals matter again, Ms. Soni believes she has determined an appropriate near-term basis for valuing gold equities. It uses spot commodity prices plus 10% to determine net asset values: $850 per ounce for gold, $10.50 for silver, $1.80 per pound of copper and $0.58 for zinc.

This produces returns between 30% and 60%, which she considers a reasonable near-term basis for valuation until gold moves upward again. Ms. Soni has also produced target prices and net asset values for the long term, with an extra 10% for gold again, or $930, a level she said is “imminently achievable.”

As a result of these changes, Credit Suisse has upgraded its rating on Kinross Gold Corp. (KGC) to “outperform,” while Yamana Gold Inc. (AUY) and Northgate Minerals Corp. (NXG) have been downgraded to “neutral.” Target price reductions for the miners it covers range from 18% to 80%.

“The issues in the mid-tier space are those of operational risk and to a lesser extent, the spectre of potential funding shortfall,” Ms. Soni said. Yamana’s recent production and cost revisions have not been well-received, sending its share price multiple from near-senior levels to the discounted mid-tier level.

She cited several other near-term issues that could weigh on the stock. Its production ramp-up will likely be slower than expected and the market may show a lack of patience with this.

Yamana’s capital program funding could get very tight if current market conditions and commodity prices persist, which may make it very hard for the company to resist issuing equity given the success Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd. (AEM) and Red Back Mining Inc. (RBIFF.PK) have had with their recent financings.

Cut-backs to preserve capital will hurt its value in terms of adding exploration and growth opportunities, and Yamana currently has significant exposure to copper.

And while Ms. Soni suggested that Yamana is perhaps the best candidate for a takeover given its low valuation and a few very good assets, particularly El Penon in Chile, she says this is not enough to recommend it as an “outperform.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • More
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...

IAMGOLD: Expect a Move Higher – Seeking Alpha

08 Monday Dec 2008

Posted by jschulmansr in capitalism, commodities, Copper, Currency and Currencies, Finance, Fundamental Analysis, gold, hard assets, inflation, Investing, investments, Latest News, Markets, mining stocks, Moving Averages, precious metals, silver, small caps, Stocks, Technical Analysis, Today, U.S. Dollar, Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

agricultural commodities, alternate energy, Austrian school, banking crisis, banks, bear market, Bollinger Bands, bull market, capitalism, central banks, China, Comex, commodities, communism, Copper, Currencies, currency, deflation, depression, diamonds, dollar denominated, dollar denominated investments, economic, economic trends, economy, financial, Forex, futures, futures markets, gold, gold miners, hard assets, heating oil, India, inflation, investments, Keith Fitz-Gerald, market crash, Markets, mining companies, Moving Averages, natural gas, oil, palladium, Peter Schiff, physical gold, platinum, platinum miners, precious metals, price, price manipulation, prices, producers, production, protection, rare earth metals, recession, risk, run on banks, safety, Saudi Arabia, Sean Rakhimov, silver, silver miners, socialism, sovereign, spot, spot price, stagflation, Technical Analysis, timber, U.S. Dollar, volatility, warrants, Water

IAMGOLD: Expect a Move Higher – Seeking Alpha

By: Glenn Cutler of The Winners Forum.com

IAMGOLD Corp (IAG) is a Canadian based mining company that participates in worldwide exploration and development of mineral resources and produces roughly 1 million ounces of gold annually from eight property locations on three continents: North America, South America and Africa. The company boasts the largest cash flow ratio on investment in the entire industry and is second among top mining companies in terms of achieving earnings per $1000 invested. Revenue, adjusted net earnings and cash flow have all risen sharply through the first 9 months of 2008.

IAG MAINTAINS STRONG FINANCIAL POSITION

Given recent concerns about the economy and in particular, debt and leverage, stocks which are most likely to attract investor attention are those of companies that have bullet proof balance sheets, stable or growing cash flow and access to capital. IAG is a gold star candidate, with a low Debt/Equity Ratio and recent liquid assets as published in their 2008 TWP Presentation document as follows:

  • CASH and CASH EQUIVALENTS – $153 million
  • GOLD BULLION (at market value) – $154 million
  • 5-YEAR UNDRAWN CREDIT FACILITY – $140 million
  • TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE – $447 million
  • YTD 9 MONTH OPERATING CASH FLOW – $189 million

GOLD PRODUCTION/GEOGRAPHIC DIVERSIFICATION – This company produced 253,000 ounces, a 5% increase in the latest quarter. They are on track to produce 950,000 ounces in 2008. Production costs are $476/ounce slightly below the estimated $480-490 range. Geographic diversification is another important factor for investors. IAG has production at 8 different facilities which breaks down as 51% (Africa), 30% (Suriname) and 19% (Quebec). Its current goal is to double total production to 1.8 million ounces in 2012.

RESERVES and RESOURCES

Mines Proven & Probable Measured & Indicated* Inferred
Rosebel 3,233,000 8,283,000 79,000
Doyon Division* 206,000 662,000 576,000
Mupane 311,000 792,000 7,000
Tarkwa 2,307,000 2,752,000 733,000
Sadiola 394,000 1,609,000 325,000
Yatela 200,000 234,000 103,000
Damang 274,000 468,000 266,000
Total 6,925,000 14,800,000 2,089,000

IAMGOLD Acquires 71.6% of EURO RESSOURCES S. A. (EUR.TO) for $1.20 / Reopens Offer

On December 3rd, IAMGOLD Corp announced results of its $1.20/share tender offer for French company Euro Ressources S.A. That company’s principal asset is a 10% royalty interest in the Rosebel Gold Mine in Suriname which is operated by IAMGOLD. This mine which is estimated to have 10 million ounces, achieved record throughput and the $44 million expansion and optimization project in on target for completion in early 2009. According to the CEO of IAMGOLD, this strategic purchase will reduce cash costs by about $45 per ounce produced at this specific property.

With the recent decline in the foreign exchange rate of the Euro currency, IAG was able to move quickly to purchase Euros and lock in the transaction cost at an average rate of 1.27, approximately 15% below the 1.47 exchange rate the date they announced the deal. Regulations require the offer be reopened for an additional 10 days at the same price, until December 17th.

IAG STOCK – Recent Price Activity

Typical of most mining stocks, IAG has been in a steady downtrend over the past year. Shares were banging around $10 when the year began and then gradually declined. The price stair-stepped its way down, spending time in each support zone before breaking down to the next area where buyers would regroup. The $5-6 range held from April through most of September, and then when financial markets cracked the price tumbled hard and fast to print a recent new low around $2.22 a share. Shares have been trending modestly higher since hitting their lows, and it’s possible we could see a new pattern of higher lows and higher highs on a recovery.

Given its outstanding balance sheet and strong positive cash flow, downside investment risk is small. Technical patterns indicate a high probability for shares to move up into their recent congestion zone between $5.50 and $6.50, where there will be overhead supply to work through before the stock could continue higher. As with all mining stocks, performance relates directly to how the underlying precious metals perform, so it’s critical that gold move in either a sideways manner where mining stocks can consolidate and base build or trend modestly higher. Or, if the gold market can rally strong, there is no doubt shares of mining stocks will also rise nicely.

Based on a multi-decade chart of gold, there is reason to believe a move higher is not far off. A more detailed discussion of the technical outlook for gold is available in a published report at TheWinnersForum.com – Cutler’s Stock Market Blog.

OTHER FUNDAMENTAL FACTORS – Considerations for Investment

UNDERVALUED MARKET VALUATION VERSUS PEERS – The slide in the share price to below $4 now values the entire company at $1.2 billion, which is now only 1.5x trailing 12-month revenue, far below industry peers. To compare: Agnico-Eagle Mines (AEM) trades at 10x, Kinross Gold (KGC) trades at 6.5x, Newmont Mining (NEM) trades at 2.2x and Barrick Gold (ABX) trades at nearly 3x revenue.

RECENT ACQUISITION OF DOYON ROYALTY – In July, with a focus on reducing cash costs, the firm acquired the participation royalty in the Doyon/Westwood Property located in Quebec from Barrick Gold for $13 million. The acquisition eliminated royalty payments which was 25% of gold prices above $375 an ounce. The savings was about $140 an ounce. The participation royalty also extended to the Westwood Development Project, about 2 kilometers from the Doyon mine. Westwood production was also freed from royalty obligations.

Other Mining Activities / Projects

Niobium Mine in Quebec – Through its Niobec Mine in Quebec the company mines a lesser known metal called Niobium. Originally known as Columbium, this 41st element is a paramagnetic metal which has a high melting point and low density. One of its noteworthy characteristics is that it is corrosion resistant. It has superconductivity properties. It is used as an alloy in the steel industry because it increases the toughness strength and weldability of steel. It is also used in producing commemorative coins. According the company, the addition of $4 of niobium can reduce the weight of mid-sized cars by 100kg which save .05l/100 km in fuel consumption. It is also used in construction and land based turbine and jet engines. They company forecast to produce 4300 tons in 2008.

Quimsacocha gold Project in Ecuador – A new constitution took effect in Ecuador in October which received 64% of a referendum vote. This is a positive development that will enable a new mining law to allow responsible mining in the country. The 100% owned 3.5 million ounce Quimsacocha Project will complete its feasibility study in 2009.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • More
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...

Court won’t review Obama’s eligibility to serve – Yahoo! News

08 Monday Dec 2008

Posted by jschulmansr in 2008 Election, Barack Obama, Currency and Currencies, Electoral College, Finance, Free Speech, id theft, Investing, investments, John McCain, Latest News, Markets, Politics, Presidential Election, Prophecy, psychology, socialism, Stocks, u.s. constitution, Uncategorized

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

2008 Election, Barack Dunham, Barack Hussein Obama, Barack Obama, Barry Dunham, Barry Soetoro, capitalism, Chicago Tribune, Columbia University, Currency and Currencies, D.c. press club, Electoral College, Electors, Finance, fraud, Free Speech, gold, Harvard Law School, hawaii, id theft, Indonesia, Indonesian Citizenship, Investing, investments, Joe Biden, John McCain, Latest News, legal documents, Markets, name change, natural born citizen, Oath of Allegiance of the President of the United State, Occidental College, Phillip Berg, Politics, poser, Presidential Election, Sarah Palin, socialism, Stocks, Today, treason, u.s. constitution, U.S. Dollar, Uncategorized, voter fraud, we the people foundation

Court won’t review Obama’s eligibility to serve – Yahoo! News

My Obama Watch Central

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court has turned down an emergency appeal from a New Jersey man who says President-elect Barack Obama is ineligible to be president because he was a British subject at birth.

The court did not comment on its order Monday rejecting the call by Leo Donofrio of East Brunswick, N.J., to intervene in the presidential election. Donofrio says that since Obama had dual nationality at birth — his mother was American and his Kenyan father at the time was a British subject — he cannot possibly be a “natural born citizen,” one of the requirements the Constitution lists for eligibility to be president.

Donofrio also contends that two other candidates, Republican John McCain and Socialist Workers candidate Roger Calero, also are not natural-born citizens and thus ineligible to be president.

At least one other appeal over Obama’s citizenship remains at the court. Philip J. Berg of Lafayette Hill, Pa., argues that Obama was born in Kenya, not Hawaii as Obama says and the Hawaii secretary of state has confirmed. Berg says Obama also may be a citizen of Indonesia, where he lived as a boy. Federal courts in Pennsylvania have dismissed Berg’s lawsuit.

My Question Is Still Why Doesn’t Obama just produce his Birth Certificate So this is over once and for all! 

Otherwise even according to the Chicago Tribune “this will drive a wedge in an already undivided public”

See Below:

Court won’t review Obama’s eligibility to serve

By Tim Jones

Tribune correspondent

9:16 AM CST, December 8, 2008

UPDATE: The Supreme Court has turned down an emergency appeal from a New Jersey man who says President-elect Barack Obama is ineligible to be president because he was a British subject at birth.

The court did not comment on its order Monday rejecting the call by Leo Donofrio of East Brunswick, N.J., to intervene in the presidential election. Donofrio says that since Obama had dual nationality at birth — his mother was American and his Kenyan father at the time was a British subject — he cannot possibly be a “natural born citizen,” one of the requirements the Constitution lists for eligibility to be president.

Donofrio also contends that two other candidates, Republican John McCain and Socialist Workers candidate Roger Calero, also are not natural-born citizens and thus ineligible to be president.

At least one other appeal over Obama’s citizenship remains at the court. Philip J. Berg of Lafayette Hill, Pa., argues that Obama was born in Kenya, not Hawaii as Obama says and the Hawaii secretary of state has confirmed. Berg says Obama also may be a citizen of Indonesia, where he lived as a boy. Federal courts in Pennsylvania have dismissed Berg’s lawsuit.

 

This is a story that won’t go away.Barack Obama‘s birth certificate, the controversy over allegations that Obama is not eligible to take office next month has reached the Supreme Court, which is expected to announce Monday whether it will consider the matter.tmjones@tribune.com

Five weeks after the State of Hawaii vouched for the authenticity of President-elect

The fight is unusual because it thrives outside the so-called mainstream media, far beyond the oak-paneled offices of $700-an-hour lawyers and a world away from the 535 individuals whose surnames are preceded by Representative or Senator.

This is a different army at work, in an environment increasingly influenced by the Internet.

“It’s only being mentioned by a relative few, by the real die-hard, anti-Obama crowd,” said Michael Harrison, editor and publisher of Talkers magazine, the trade bible of the talk-radio industry. “On mainstream talk radio, it’s not a big deal right now. I think it’s run its course.”

“But,” Harrison added, “we live in a time that, because of the Internet, all points of view can live forever.”

Just as there is a split on the legitimacy of the legal claims, there is also a split within the media on the merits of the story. Is it the last gasp of opposition from opponents of Obama who have a found community of like-minded believers on the Internet, or is there a legal question to be resolved? The court will answer the latter question this week.

The campaign challenging the legitimacy of Obama’s 1961 birth certificate or the legality of his taking office is chronicled by WorldNetDaily, a popular, politically right-leaning site that was the 26th most-visited news and media Web site during November, according to Hitwise, which monitors Net traffic.

“If this [Obama taking office] happens, the question of eligibility for the highest office in the land will no longer even be a matter for concern,” wrote Joseph Farah, founder and editor of WorldNetDaily.

“Precedent will have been established. Arnold Schwarzenegger will suddenly be eligible to run for the office in 2012,” Farah wrote, referring to the Austrian-born California governor and film star.

An Obama spokesman declined to comment for this story.

The lawyers who, in at least six states including New Jersey and Connecticut, have argued Obama is not a natural-born citizen and cannot be president include one who supported Hillary Clinton’s presidential bid, one who has thundered for decades against the legality of the federal government collecting income tax, and one who argues that Sen. John McCain, by virtue of his birth 72 years ago in the Panama Canal Zone, would be banned from moving into the Oval Office, had he won last month’s election.

Leo Donofrio is a New Jersey lawyer who tried to get Obama and McCain stricken from the New Jersey ballot in November. Donofrio’s case was presented Friday to justices of the Supreme Court. Another case challenging Obama’s eligibility, this one from Pennsylvania, has not yet been presented to the full court for its consideration.

“My question is on a pure constitutional ground,” said Donofrio. “[Obama] is a citizen of the United States. I just don’t believe he’s a natural-born citizen.”

This is the thrust of the attack, picked up by people such as Bob Schulz, an upstate New York engineer who bought two full-page ads in the Tribune this month that called Obama “a usurper” who “would be entitled to no allegiance, obedience or support from the People.”

Schulz has challenged the federal government on issues including the Iraq War, the Patriot Act and the income tax. “I have a long history of petitioning the government for redress of grievances for violations of the constitution and the law,” said Schulz, who said he and his wife live on Social Security checks. Schulz said the ads cost “tens of thousands of dollars” and were paid for with more than 500 private donations from individuals who support the effort. He said there were “no financial angels” behind it.

If the Supreme Court decides not to consider the case, Donofrio said there “won’t be any beating on the drums saying there wasn’t any justice.”

But that will not be the end of the matter, Farah vowed.

“It’ll plague Obama throughout his presidency. It’ll be a nagging issue and a sore on his administration, much like Monica Lewinsky was on [ President Bill] Clinton,” Farah said. “It’s not going to go away and it will drive a wedge in an already divided public.”

That may underscore a landscape change in the media, where the Internet is playing a bigger role in setting the agenda. In 2004, the so-called swift boat campaign against Sen. John Kerry, the Democratic presidential nominee, began on the Internet. In fact, the co-author of “Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry,” Jerome Corsi, also wrote “Obama Nation,” a book critical of Obama, published earlier this year.

Brendan Nyhan, a political scientist at Duke University, said the Internet’s role in forming public opinion is gaining strength. WorldNetDaily, for instance, has one of the faster-growing audiences on the Internet, up 62 percent in the past year, according to Hitwise.

Nyhan co-wrote a study this year that said journalists’ attempts to correct misinformation is unlikely to sway public perceptions because many people want to believe the misperception.

“People often have a strong bias for believing the evidence they want to believe and disbelieving what they don’t believe,” Nyhan said. “There is less of a sense that we all have a common set of facts we can agree on. There’s a polarization, and we can’t even agree on the basic factual assumptions to have a debate.”

 

Copyright © 2008, Chicago Tribune

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • More
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...

Latest Obama News, Supremes Deliberating, Muslim Plea To Obama, More

07 Sunday Dec 2008

Posted by jschulmansr in 2008 Election, Barack Obama, Currency and Currencies, Electoral College, Finance, Free Speech, Fundamental Analysis, id theft, inflation, Investing, investments, Joe Biden, John McCain, Markets, Politics, Presidential Election, Sarah Palin, socialism, Today, u.s. constitution, U.S. Dollar

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

2008 Election, Barack Dunham, Barack Hussein Obama, Barack Obama, Barry Dunham, Barry Soetoro, capitalism, Chicago Tribune, Columbia University, Currency and Currencies, D.c. press club, Electoral College, Electors, Finance, fraud, Free Speech, gold, Harvard Law School, hawaii, id theft, Indonesia, Indonesian Citizenship, Investing, investments, Joe Biden, John McCain, Latest News, legal documents, Markets, name change, natural born citizen, Oath of Allegiance of the President of the United State, Occidental College, Phillip Berg, Politics, poser, Presidential Election, Sarah Palin, socialism, Stocks, Today, treason, u.s. constitution, U.S. Dollar, Uncategorized, voter fraud, we the people foundation

Latest Obama News, Supremes Deliberating, Muslim Plea To Obama, More…

Decision on Obama

citizenship pending…

Court delays action on suit

Source Washington Times By Tom Ramstack

The Supreme Court held off Friday on deciding whether to grant a hearing in a long-shot lawsuit that would decide whether Barack Obama can constitutionally become president as a “natural born” U.S. citizen.

The Friday list of court orders that denies or grants hearings did not mention the lawsuit, which says Mr. Obama should be disqualified from the presidency because he purportedly acquired the same British citizenship that his father had when he was born.

A spokesman for the court said the decision on whether to hear the suit brought by retired New Jersey lawyer Leo Donofrio is likely to be announced next week.

The Supreme Court may hear a lawsuit that argues President-elect Barack Obama cannot become president as a "natural born" U.S. citizen. (Associated Press)

A decision not to grant a writ of certiorari — the legal term for the declaration that the justices will hear the case — would mean that a lower court ruling that dismissed the lawsuit can stand.

The Supreme Court’s justices met in a private conference Friday morning to discuss the issue. At least four of the court’s nine justices must approve before the case is heard.

Justice Clarence Thomas picked up the petition to hear the lawsuit after it was denied by Justice David H. Souter. Justice Thomas referred it to the full court,     which decided to distribute the case for the justices’ conference.

Mr. Obama demonstrated his citizenship during his campaign by circulating copies of his birth certificate, which showed he was born in Hawaii on Aug. 4, 1961. But unlike many of the lawsuits regarding Mr. Obama’s citizenship — which claim he really was born on foreign soil — Mr. Donofrio’s case concedes that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii but says he still held foreign citizenship at birth.

“Since Barack Obama’s father was a citizen of Kenya, and therefore subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of Senator Obama’s birth,  then Senator Obama was a British citizen ‘at birth,’ just like the framers of the Constitution, and therefore, even if he were to produce an original birth certificate proving he were born on U.S. soil, he still wouldn’t be eligible to be president.”

Kenya was British East Africa until it received its independence in 1963.

Legal scholars doubt the court will hear the case. The Supreme Court rarely grants the kind of court orders — or stays — sought by Mr. Donofrio. And doing so in this case would set up an unprecedented challenge to the presidency of a man who already has won the election and almost certainly will have taken office by the time any hearings or decisions could occur.

About a half-dozen people who say the court should stop Mr. Obama from becoming president protested in front of the Supreme Court on Friday morning.

“He does not meet the criteria of the Constitution that the Founding Fathers set out,” said Roger Bredow, an Internet publisher from Bethlehem, Ga., who has tried to rally lawsuit supporters to block Mr. Obama’s presidency.

Valerie Wohllheden, of Alexandria, said the danger is that in deciding the lawsuit, the Supreme Court might bend to “the will of the people” by allowing Mr. Obama to become president despite constitutional provisions.

“Then you’ve got mob rule,” she said. “How can he uphold the Constitution if  he’s breaking it?”

The Supreme Court may hear a lawsuit that argues President-elect Barack  Obama cannot become president as a “natural born” U.S. citizen.  (Associated Press)

After the list of actions was released, Washington resident Theresa Cao said  she took heart from the court’s delaying its decision on whether to grant a hearing.

“They apparently need the time to deliberate,” she said.

Copyright 2008 Washington Times-used with permission

=====================================

Will Supremes Review Citizenship Arguments?

Lawsuit: Even with a valid Birth Certificate, ‘he still wouldn’t be eligible to be president’

Source: © 2008 WorldNetDaily-used with permission

With protesters gathering and praying on the front steps, the U.S. Supreme Court met in conference today to discuss whether or not to hear a case challenging Barak.Obama’s eligibility to be president.

“Obama was born a dual citizen,” protester Roger Bredow told the Washington, D.C., local events blog, DCist. “British, and a citizen of the United States, at birth.”

According to Bredow – and the case the Supreme Court reviewed today – dual citizenship makes Obama ineligible to take the oath of office.

 

Roger Bredow and demonstrators protesting before the U.S. Supreme Court

Roger Bredow and demonstrators protesting before the U.S. Supreme Court

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Where’s the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the “natural-born American” clause in the Constitution? If you still want to see it, sign WND’s petition demanding the release of his birth certificate.

The case of Leo C. Donofrio v. New Jersey Secretary of State Nina Mitchell  Wells, which claims Obama does not meet the Constitution’s Article 2, Section 1 “natural-born citizen” requirement for president, was initially denied a hearing by Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter, but Justice Clarence Thomas agreed to bring it back for review today.

In order to go forward in the process, the case needs four of the Supreme Court’s  nine justices to approve a full hearing.

Bredow created a YouTube video inviting supporters to travel to Washington, D.C., and join him in urging the Supreme Court to hear the Donofrio case.

 

“If I’m going to be honest with you,” Bredow confessed, “I thought I might be the only person here.”

DCist contributor Dave Weigel reported roughly 15 to 20 people showed up for the rally.

“There aren’t a lot of people out here today,” said Steve Brindle, who drove into  the capital from Pennsylvania. “There are a lot of people talking about this back  home. Really, everyone’s asking questions.”

Donofrio’s questions began months ago.

Donofrio’s original suit sought a court order to stop the Nov. 4 presidential   election. When that was denied, he amended his complaint to stop the Electoral College from certifying Obama as the winning candidate when it meets Dec. 15.

Unlike many of the lawsuits regarding Obama’s “natural-born citizen” status, the Donofrio case makes no allegation that Obama was born on foreign soil. Instead, Donofrio contends Obama was a British citizen at birth,  because of citizenship in a British colony, Kenya.

“Don’t be distracted by the birth certificate and Indonesia issues,” Donofrio writes on his Natural Born Citizen blog. “They are irrelevant to Senator Obama’s ineligibility to be president. Since Barack Obama’s father was a citizen of Kenya and therefore subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of Senator Obama’s birth, then Senator Obama was a British citizen ‘at birth.'”

Obama’s Fight the Smears website confirms that Donofrio is correct about the crat’s citizenship at birth, but says his dual citizenship with Britain expired, leaving him with only American citizenship.

Donfrio, however, contends that the Constitution was written in such a way to exclude dual citizens like Obama.

“The Framers of the Constitution, at the time of their birth,” Donofrio writes, “were also British citizens, and that’s why the Framers declared that, while they  were citizens of the United States, they themselves were not ‘natural born citizens.'”

“Therefore,” Donofrio summarizes, “even if he were to produce an original birth certificate proving he were born on U.S. soil, he still wouldn’t be eligible to be president.”

As WND has reported, Donofrio’s case is only one of several filed around the  country challenging Obama’s eligibility to be elected president under the Constitution.

Last month WND reported worries over a “constitutional crisis” that could be looming over the issue of Obama’s citizenship.

WND senior reporter Jerome Corsi even traveled to Kenya and Hawaii prior to the election to investigate issues surrounding Obama’s birth. But his research and discoveries only raised more questions.

The biggest question is why Obama, if a Hawaii birth certificate exists as his campaign has stated, simply hasn’t ordered it made available to settle the rumors.

The governor’s office in Hawaii said there is a valid certificate but rejected requests for access and left ambiguous its origin: Does the certificate on file with the Department of Health indicate a Hawaii birth or was it generated after the Obama family registered a Kenyan birth in Hawaii?

Obama’s half-sister, Maya Soetoro, has named two different Hawaii hospitals where Obama could have been born. There have been other allegations that Obama actually was born in Kenya during a time when his father was a British subject.

Former presidential candidate Alan Keyes and others filed a court petition in California asking the secretary of state to refuse to allow the state’s 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the 2008 presidential election until Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office.

The California action was filed by Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation on behalf of Keyes, the presidential candidate of the American Independent Party, along with Wiley S. Drake and Markham Robinson, both California electors.

“Should Senator Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America and, thereby, his election declared void, Petitioners, as well as other Americans, will suffer irreparable harm in that (a) usurper will be sitting as the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal,” the action challenges.

The popular vote Nov. 4 favored Obama over Sen. John McCain by several percentage points. But because of the distribution of the votes, Obama is projected to take the Electoral College vote by a 2-to-1 margin.

The California case states, “There is a reasonable and common expectation by the voters that to qualify for the ballot, the individuals running for office  must meet minimum qualifications as outlined in the federal and state Constitutions and statutes, and that compliance with those minimum qualifications has been confirmed by the officials overseeing the election process,” the complaint said, when in fact the only documentation currently required is a signed statement from the candidate attesting to those qualifications.

“Since [the secretary of state] has, as its core, the mission of certifying and establishing the validity of the election process, this writ seeks a Court Order barring SOS from certifying the California Electors until documentary proof that Senator Obama is a ‘natural born’ citizen of the United States of America is received by her,” the document said.

“This proof could include items such as his original birth certificate, showing the name of the hospital and the name and the signature of the doctor, all of his passports with immigration stamps, and verification from the governments where the candidate has resided, verifying that he did not, and does not, hold citizenship of these countries, and any other documents that certify an individual’s citizenship and/or qualification for office.

The “certification of live birth” posted by the Obama campaign cannot be viewed as authoritative, the case alleges.

“Hawaii Revised Statute 338-178 allows registration of birth in Hawaii for a child that was born outside of Hawaii to parents who, for a year preceding the child’s birth, claimed Hawaii as their place of residence,” the document said. “The only way to know where Senator Obama was actually born is to view Senator Obama’s original birth certificate from 1961 that shows the name of the hospital and the name and signature of the doctor that delivered him.”

The case also raises the circumstances of Obama’s time during his youth in Indonesia, where he was listed as having Indonesian citizenship. Indonesia does not allow dual citizenship, raising the possibility of Obama’s mother having given up her U.S. citizenship.

Any subsequent U.S. citizenship then, the case claims, would be “naturalized,” not “natural-born.”

WND’s petition is available online, and more information is available at this link.

Muslim plea to Obama: Return to ‘Islamic Roots’

‘Allah will reward you for all who you convert in your footsteps’

By Aaron Klein
© 2008 WorldNetDaily-used with permission

 JERUSALEM – Claiming Barack Obama has roots in the Islamic religion, an   Egyptian cleric has broadcast a plea urging Obama to convert to Islam while warning if the U.S. doesn’t withdraw its troops from the Middle East and provide aid to Muslims, those “eager for [death]” will attack America.

“My message to [Obama] is threefold,” declares Egyptian cleric Hassan Abu Al-Ashbal, speaking last week on the state-funded Al Nas religious television network. “First, I invite him to convert to Islam. This is the call of the Prophet and of Allah. Oh, Obama – convert to Islam, and you will be saved.”

Video of Ashbal’s message can be seen below:

Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • More
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...

Pravda- Is Reporting On Obama Birth Certificate Controversy

04 Thursday Dec 2008

Posted by jschulmansr in 2008 Election, Barack Obama, Currency and Currencies, Electoral College, Finance, id theft, Investing, investments, Joe Biden, John McCain, Latest News, Markets, Presidential Election, Sarah Palin, socialism, Stocks, Today, u.s. constitution, U.S. Dollar, Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

2008 Election, Barack Dunham, Barack Hussein Obama, Barack Obama, Barry Dunham, Barry Soetoro, capitalism, Chicago Tribune, Columbia University, Currency and Currencies, D.c. press club, Electoral College, Electors, Finance, fraud, Free Speech, gold, grassfire.org, grassroots, Harvard Law School, hawaii, id theft, Indonesia, Indonesian Citizenship, Investing, investments, Joe Biden, John McCain, join the resistance, Latest News, legal documents, Markets, name change, natural born citizen, Oath of Allegiance of the President of the United State, Occidental College, Phillip Berg, Politics, poser, Presidential Election, Sarah Palin, socialism, Stocks, Today, treason, u.s. constitution, U.S. Dollar, Uncategorized, voter fraud, we the people foundation

Where are the American Reporters? Fox Why Aren’t You Reporting? CNN, MSNBC, CBS all Still SILENT! In This Case Silence Is Not Golden Unless You Are Obama!-jschulmansr

My Obama Watch Central – Jschulmansr

Here is the Russian Newspaper Report:

Barack, The Amazing Mr. Obama – Pravda.Ru

By: Mark S. McGrew

Barack, The Amazing Mr. Obama

Barack Obama is truly an amazing man, with many amazing friends. He has succeeded where countless others have failed. And he has also succeeded where many before him have succeeded with the same time honored methods.

Barry Sotero, AKA Barack Obama, along with the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission have successfully ignored a Federal Lawsuit asking him to produce a valid Birth Certificate. When the time to respond to that lawsuit expired, under Federal Court Rules, they all admitted that he was not a citizen of The United States of America and deemed to have committed fraud. A normal man would have been found to have admitted he was not a US citizen.

But the man with no visible past, was blessed by a light shining from above on a Federal Judge, by having the lawsuit against him dismissed, three weeks after his non-response was proof that he is not a US citizen.

That lawsuit has since been taken to the US Supreme Court, where Obama, the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission have until December 1, 2008 to answer the complaint made against them.

Another lawsuit by another attorney against him to prove he is a US citizen has been scheduled for a conference of Justices of the US Supreme Court on December 5, 2008.

Full documentation of the Philip Berg lawsuit can be seen here at ObamaCrimes.com and a copy of a full page ad regarding this in the Washington Times can be seen here.

A full page ad in the Chicago Tribune, asking Obama to prove his citizenship can be seen here.

Other lawsuits landed in the Supreme Court of The United States can be seen here.

Alan Keyes, a Presidential candidate has also filed a lawsuit in California Supreme Court to not certify the California Electors of the US Electoral College until Obama can prove that he is a US citizen. It is those Electors who decide who shall be President of the United States of America on December 15, 2008. That lawsuit can be seen here.

Speak the truth and shame the devil on Pravda.ru forum

Barack Obama promised people what they wanted: Hope and Change, without ever saying what that hope and change were going to be. One of Obama’s much praised abilities is his way of being very articulate in his speeches.

Every con man walking free or in jail is an articulate speaker. Who would give their trust to a man who could not use the right words to convince his targets to trust him? Articulate speaking is no way to judge or rate the integrity of a person.

Every con game uses three ingredients against the target: Sell the dream. Push the greed button. Stress urgency.

Obama sold the dream of hope and change so desperately wanted by the American voters. He pushed the greed button by promising to take from the rich to give to the poor. And he stressed urgency by himself and his wife telling voters to vote early. Another final nail in the coffin a con man uses against his targets is “The Jack Call”. After your sucker has committed himself to buying your offer, but has not sent the check, the con man calls him with “Good news!!!” and constantly re-sells his target until the check has cleared and the funds are in the con man’s bank account.

The non-existent Office of the President Elect is the Jack Call. The constant news shots of his “involvement and concern” in national and world issues are the repeated Jack Calls.

It remains to be seen if Barry Sotero, Barack Obama or whatever his name is, is appointed President by the Electoral College.

The only “Certificate of Birth” that he has produced is not a Birth Certificate. It is a Certificate of Live Birth, which any foreign citizen can obtain by simply showing up at the Vital Records department of the State of Hawaii and showing the original Birth Certificate from the original birth place, regardless of what country the birth took place in. Forensic records experts have stated that the document Obama produced on his web site is a forgery.

The only comment made by the Hawaii Department of Vital Records is that they “Have seen the original Birth Certificate”. They never once have said he was born in Hawaii.

None of these lawsuits and suspicions mean as much as the fact that Obama can easily dispel all the legal actions and mistrust by simply producing a valid Birth Certificate. It matters not in the least that he has not proven his attendance at Harvard and Columbia University. It does not matter that any number of claims about his past and his experience have not been validated.

The only thing that matters is that he refuses to produce a valid Birth Certificate and instead spends thousands of dollars on attorneys and defies Federal lawsuits and State lawsuits asking him to produce one single piece of paper that most every citizen of every nation of the world has easy and rapid access to.

But beyond all of that controversy, there is one subject in this man’s activities that is truly astounding: There is absolutely no proof whatsoever that his beloved grandmother actually died on the day before the election as his campaign said she did. He said he would attend her funeral “In a few days”. He never did. Then he said he would have a funeral for her around the end of the year. What kind of person keeps their grandmother’s body on ice for two months? What kind of a person would play on the death of his grandmother to win “the sympathy vote”? Where is the proof that she died when she said she did? Normally, we could simply learn from the local coroner of a well known person’s death. But the only public comment made by the Honolulu Medical Examiner, who acts as coroner in Honolulu, Hawaii was, “We didn’t work that case.”

Barack Obama may just win his place in history as the greatest con man of all time. A hundred million people believed him and spent 600 million dollars to get him “elected” to the highest office in America, without ever knowing if he is or is not eligible to even run as an American citizen. It is either amazing that he will pull it off or it is amazing that so many millions of people believed him.

If the Electoral College appoints him as President of The United States of America on December 15, 2008 and Congress ratifies that choice, and it is later proven that he is not a US citizen, then not one single word he utters will be valid as representing this country. The Courts, our police, our military will have no duty to obey anything he signs. It is also possible that certain people, who were part of and promoted the con, may be charged with Treason.

And if he does prove that he is a US citizen the questions remain: Why did he fight so long and so hard to not show that simple, single piece of paper when asked? Why would a man subject so many citizens of his country and leaders of other nations to such mistrust?

Pravda Raises Obama Eligibility Issue

By Chelsea Schilling
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

Questions about Obama’s citizenship status are spreading like wildfire on the Internet, and some media outlets are beginning to run stories on the issue.Even the Russian online newspaper Pravda featured a column about “the man with no visible past.”
“Barry Sotero, AKA Barack Obama, along with the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission have successfully ignored a Federal Lawsuit asking him to produce a valid Birth Certificate,” the piece by Mark McGrew states. “When the time to respond to that lawsuit expired, under Federal Court

 
 
While McGrew acknowledges Obama is praised for his way with words, he warns, “Every con man walking free or in jail is an articulate speaker. Who would give their trust to a man who could not use the right words to convince his targets to trust him? Articulate speaking is no way to judge or rate the integrity of a person.”
The writer said every con man sells a “dream,” pushes a “greed button,” stresses “urgency” – and it claims Americans fell for a con man.
“Obama sold the dream of hope and change so desperately wanted by the American voters. He pushed the greed button by promising to take from the rich to give to the poor. And he stressed urgency by himself and his wife telling voters to vote early.”

McGrew explains that Obama’s “certificate of birth” is not a birth certificate, but a certification of live birth that any foreigner can acquire by applying for one in the state’s vital records department, regardless of where the baby was born.

Other media outlets have also begun reporting on the issue.

The Chicago Tribune published a news article about Robert L. Schultz, chairman of the We The People Foundation, after he ran a full-page ad in the newspaper demanding Obama produce documents proving he is eligible for office. However, the writer attempted to debunk Schultz’s claims paragraph by paragraph.

A Chicago Sun-Times columnist accused the We The People Foundation of having “money to throw away” for posting an “inflammatory ad” in the Chicago Tribune.

NBC Chicago’s website led its story with the following statement: “Critics continue to invest in ads to convince Americans that he is not one of theirs.”

Also, the Kansas City Star featured a news article claiming “legions of anti-Obama bloggers” have filed lawsuits claiming Obama is constitutionally ineligible to be president.

The Star’s story said “skeptics” believe there are several “co-conspirators” in the “tangled web of conspiracy and silence,” including election officials who put candidates’ name on ballots, judges who throw out lawsuits, mainstream media, Obama’s family and Hawaiian authorities.

Even AOL News’ blog featured a “Q&A with Obama birth certificate doubters,” while another entry accused the We The People Foundation of being part of “the cult of Barack Obama’s birth certificate.”

However, amid skeptical reports, the New American reported, “This story has gained credence, separating it from Internet rumors, because Obama has reputedly hired three law firms (firms, not lawyers) to make sure that no one gets access to his birth records in Hawaii or his college transcripts from Occidental College and Harvard.”

So far, major television networks and many other mainstream newspapers are continuing to be silent on the matter.

 Suit Contesting Obama’s Citizenship Heads To The Supreme Court

From the Chicago Tribune

MORE ON BARACK OBAMA

Justices will decide whether to consider the case

By James Janega | Tribune reporter

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama‘s U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama’s election.

The meeting of justices will coincide with a vigil by the filer’s supporters in Washington on the steps of the nation’s highest court.

The suit originally sought to stay the election, and was filed on behalf of Leo Donofrio against New Jersey Secretary of State Nina Mitchell Wells.

Legal experts say the appeal has little chance of succeeding, despite appearing on the court’s schedule. Legal records show it is only the tip of an iceberg of nationwide efforts seeking to derail Obama’s election over accusations that he either wasn’t born a U.S. citizen or that he later renounced his citizenship in Indonesia.

The column said Obama can easily put the issue to rest by producing the document, rather than spending thousands of dollars on attorneys to defy federal and state lawsuits.

 

“Barack Obama may just win his place in history as the greatest con man of all time,” the author said. “A hundred million people believed him and spent 600 million dollars to get him ‘elected’ to the highest office in America, without ever knowing if he is or is not eligible to even run as an American citizen. It is either amazing that he will pull it off or it is amazing that so many millions of people believed him.”

 

Other coverage

Related links

  • Tax activist’s ad challenges Obama’s eligibility for office

  • Barack Obama birth certificate Barack Obama birth certificate Photo

  • Group’s founder on WGN-AM: It’s not about Obama Audio

  • See the group’s ad

The Obama campaign has maintained that he was born in Hawaii, has an authentic birth certificate, and is a “natural-born” U.S. citizen. Hawaiian officials agree.

Among those filing lawsuits is Alan Keyes, who lost to Obama in the 2004 Illinois Senate race. Keyes’ suit seeks to halt certification of votes in California. Another suit by a Kentucky man seeks to have a federal judge review Obama’s original birth certificate, which Hawaiian officials say is locked in a state vault.

Other suits have been filed by Andy Martin, whose case was dismissed in Hawaii, and by an Ohio man whose case also was dismissed. Five more suits, all later dismissed, were filed in Hawaii by a person who is currently suing the “Peoples Association of Human, Animals Conceived God/s and Religions, John McCain [and] USA Govt.” The plaintiff previously sought to sue Wikipedia and “All News Media.”

The most famous case questioning Obama’s citizenship was filed in Pennsylvania in August on behalf of Philip J. Berg and sought to enjoin the Democratic National Committee from nominating Obama. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to accept the case. Earlier, a federal judge rejected it for “lack of standing”—ruling that Berg had no legal right to sue. In cases like this, judges sometimes believe the matter is best left to political institutions, such as the Electoral College or Congress, said legal scholar Eugene Volokh of the University of California at Los Angeles.

.

The remaining case with the highest profile is Donofrio vs. Wells. Because it was distributed by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to other justices for conference, it gained undue importance for people unschooled in how the court works, Volokh said.

Many petitioners seeking stays of pending events have their cases distributed to the full court, he said. Of those, Volokh found that 782 were denied in the last eight years while just 60 were heard—and not all of those ultimately were successful.

jjanega@tribune.com

Federal Suit Seeks Obama Birth Certificate

Source: Honolulu Advertiser

Another legal effort to force state officials to produce a copy of President-elect Barack Obama’s birth certificate has been filed, this time in federal court.

Similar legal actions have been filed here and in several other states, including New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Ohio, California, Georgia and Mississippi.

Circuit Judge Bert Ayabe last month dismissed the suit filed in state court here, upholding arguments from Gov. Linda Lingle’s administration that birth records are confidential under state law.

The new challenge is an outgrowth of a legal suit filed in Mississippi, which questioned whether Obama is a “natural born citizen” of the U.S.

Plaintiffs in that suit subpoenaed a copy of the birth certificate Nov. 26 from the Hawai’i Health Department. The plaintiffs include conservative political activist and failed presidential candidate Alan Keyes, who lost to Obama in the 2004 U.S. Senate race in Illinois.

Deputy Attorney General Jill Nagamine wrote Dec. 1 to the local attorney handling the case, James Hochberg, stating that Hawai’i law prohibits disclosure of the record.

“Vital statistics records, such as birth certificates, are protected by strict confidentiality requirements under Hawai’i state law,” Nagamine wrote.

“The record could be disclosed to a person whose right to inspect or obtain a copy of the record is established by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction,” the letter continued.

“This requires more than a subpoena prepared and issued by counsel of record,” Nagamine wrote.

The state’s health director, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, issued a statement in late October saying that she and the registrar of vital statistics had inspected Obama’s Hawai’i birth certificate and found it to be valid.

During the presidential campaign, the Obama camp posted a copy of his Honolulu birth certificate on its Web site. That copy indicates he was born in Honolulu on Aug. 4, 1961.

Our System Is Broken

Joseph Farah of World Net Daily

Question: How is it possible we have a new president about to be sworn into office Jan. 20 who has never been properly vetted for eligibility?

Answer: The system is broken.

 We have a Constitution that is clear on the simple, straightforward eligibility requirements – 35 years of age, natural born citizen.

The problem is no one is enforcing it. No one in government – state or federal – even seems to care.

Recently, a reader shared a letter he received from Sen. Mel Martinez, R-Fla., about the controversy over Barack Obama’s eligibility questions. Martinez questioned none of the assertions of the letter writer vis-à-vis the unanswered questions about the missing birth certificate, issues with his parentage and his years living in Indonesia.

Instead, Martinez said the election trumped the Constitution!

He wrote that these questions were all raised during the campaign, but people voted for him anyway. Therefore, according to Martinez, the matter is settled. Obama will be the next president – the Constitution be damned.

Of course, that’s not the way it is supposed to work.

Matters of eligibility for office should have been addressed by controlling legal authorities along the way – secretaries of state, the Federal Elections Commission, judges who ruled on lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility.

Instead, citizen concerns and demands were ignored.

Question: How is it that we have courts and government agencies that are always seemingly willing to exceed their authority in other matters, but, on one so important as this, they are not even willing to carry out their sworn duties?

Answer: The system is broken.

I have an idea.

Let’s fix it.

Let’s take this matter head on right now. Let’s not wait until the next election. Let’s expose the corruption in the last. Let’s rise up in righteous indignation that our Constitution is being purposely and willfully ignored by officials who swear an oath to uphold it.

We do not live in a nation where anything goes. We do not live in a nation where voters can overturn the Constitution. We do not live in a nation ruled by men. We live in a nation ruled by the law.

Let’s keep it that way.

If the issues surrounding Obama’s status as a natural born citizen are simply swept under the rug, then the Constitution simply no longer means what it says. It no longer limits officials from doing anything they feel like doing.

I know some of you are thinking: “Farah, were you born yesterday? Don’t you know officials have been ignoring the Constitution for years?”

Yes, I know all that. I’ve been writing about it for many, many years.

But this case is more blatant. It is so simple. It is so easy to understand. Notice Mel Martinez didn’t assert that he is certain Obama is a natural born citizen. He is tacitly acknowledging – along with many of his colleagues – that there is at least serious doubt about the constitutional eligibility of the man likely to be voted in as the next president by the Electoral College Dec. 15.

If this happens, the question of eligibility for the highest office in the land will no longer even be a matter for concern. Precedent will have been established. Arnold Schwarzenegger will suddenly be eligible to run for the office in 2012. No new law will have to be passed. The Constitution will not need to be amended. The age requirement will also have to be set aside.

I’m not willing to accept this.

I’m not willing to see the final stake be driven through the heart and soul of our Constitution – the greatest document for governance since the Bible.

I urge you to stand up and fight.

If you have not yet signed my petition to all controlling legal authorities on this matter, I urge you to do so now.

My Note: It would seem like Obama has been planning this since 2006! -Read Below- Jschulmansr

All In The Family  

By Bob Unruh
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

An associate lawyer in a Chicago -based firm whose partner served on a finance committee for then-Sen. Barack Obama has advocated for the elimination of the U.S. Constitution’s requirement that a president be a “natural-born” citizen, calling the requirement “stupid” and asserting it discriminates, is outdated and undemocratic.

 The paper was written in 2006 by Sarah Herlihy, just two years after Obama had won a landslide election in Illinois to the U.S. Senate. Herlihy is listed as an associate at the Chicago firm of Kirkland & Ellis. A partner in the same firm, Bruce I. Ettelson, cites his membership on the finance committees for both  Obama and Sen. Richard Durbin on the corporate website.

The article by Herlihy is available online under law review articles from Kent University.

The issue is the subject of nearly two dozen court cases in recent weeks, including at least two that have gone to the U.S. Supreme Court.

There have been accusations that Obama was born in Kenya, not Hawaii as his campaign has stated. His paternal grandmother has stated she was in attendance at his birth in Mombasa. While Hawaii officials say they have seen his birth certificate, they have declined to release information from it.

Join more than 150,000 others in signing WND’s online petition calling for release of Barack Obama’s birth certificate and verifying beyond any shadow of a doubt his constitutional eligibility for office. This offer ends Thursday at noon Eastern Time to ensure all letters are delivered by Friday morning to the Supreme Court.

The Certification of Live Birth from Hawaii that the Obama campaign posted on the Internet isn’t considered by critics to resolve the issue, since during the 1960s when Obama was born, the new state issued the document to  infants not necessarily born in Hawaii.

There also remain unanswered questions about his youth, when he lived and attended school in Indonesia and later when he traveled to Pakistan. The questions include whether he gave up a U.S. citizenship to attend school or traveled on another nation’s passport to Pakistan at a time when U.S. passports were unwelcome there.

Answers to those issues could determine whether Obama meets the Constitution’s demand for a “natural-born” citizen.

Last But Not Least and this one is Scary! – Jschulmansr

Obama Economic Advisor Was Socialist Party Member?

North American Union supporter under consideration for top Labor post
By Aaron Klein
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

The man recently appointed to President-elect Barack Obama’s economic transition team was a bona fide member of a major U.S. socialist organization, according to literature from the group.
Former Rep. David Bonior, D-Mich., reportedly being considered for the Labor secretary position in the incoming Obama administration, has had a longstanding close relationship with the Democratic Socialists of America, or DSA, an organization dedicated to transforming America into a socialist society.
Now WND has learned the DSA’s official newsletter in 2007 identified Bonior as a DSA member at the organization’s Boston branch. Neither the DSA in Boston nor Bonior returned repeated WND calls seeking comment. Obama’s transition team did not return a phone call or e-mail inquiry.
Earlier this month, the Detroit chapter of the DSA honored Bonior and his wife, Judy, at its annual dinner. Bonior has been honored at several DSA functions the past six years, including in 2003, when he was the keynote speaker at the U.S. socialist organization’s national convention in Detroit.
At the 2003 convention, Bonior laid out his plan for a North American Parliamentary Union, according to a DSA transcript of the event.

Bonior was a longtime critic of the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, a trilateral trade bloc created by the U.S., Canadian and Mexican governments. But he argued that as long as NAFTA was in effect, a joint parliament should be formed to oversee the agreement.

“How do we democratize this globalization argument (NAFTA)?” Bonior stated at the DSA convention. “One of the ideas we came up with was forming a North American Parliamentary Union. A North America Parliament, with Mexico, Canada and the United States, with people – probably first appointed, but eventually elected like they are in the European Parliament

Bonior added: “I think the chances of this happening in the short run are not very good, but in the long run … we have a chance of forming a North American parliament, and with that, I think, the dialogue on these issues that we all struggle with and are frustrated with will have a place in which they can surface, and hopefully we can move forward.”

“The proposed North American Parliamentary Union would be a democratic structure to enfranchise all citizens – farmers, laborers, small business, environmentalists, consumer advocates and others – in the NAFTA countries, as well as, hopefully, Central America,” he said.

Bonior has other ties to the DSA. The socialist group reportedly campaigned for him in 2002 after he left Congress and ran unsuccessfully for governor of Michigan.
The New Zeal blog discovered a 2002 DSA newsletter that reports the organization’s work “focused on Rep. David Bonior’s gubernatorial campaign.”

“The local endorsed Rep. Bonior almost 18 months ago. DSA helped with the early fundraising for his campaign, collecting signatures for his nominating petitions, distributing literature at Detroit churches, and walking door to door in Macomb County on his behalf on the weekend before the primary,” stated the DSA newsletter.

In 2006, the socialist group formed a political action committee to which only DSA members in good standing are allowed to contribute, according to FEC guidelines. The DSA states the committee, which seeks to support federal political candidates supported by the socialist group, is careful about who contributes to the fund.

“Because the law is so specific, all contributions are carefully screened to make sure that they are from (DSA) members,” states a 2006 DSA newsletter.

New Zeal found that on June 19, 2006, Bonior contributed $1,000 to the DSA’s committee.

Obama appointee ‘Saddam Hussein Baghdad boy’

First elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1976, Bonior served from 1991 to 2002 as Democratic whip, the second-ranking party position in the House. He was known as a supporter of labor unions, later chairing the board of the pro-union American Rights at Work, whose board members include the American Union Movement AFL-CIO’s president, John Sweeney, a DSA member.

Bonior was a champion of the Employee Free Choice Act. The measure seeks to make the creation of unions more lenient than current requirements, such as lowering the percentage of employees that must join. It would require an employer to begin bargaining with a new union 10 days after the union is certified as the exclusive bargaining representative. If the union and employer cannot agree upon the terms of a bargaining contract within 90 days, either party can request federal mediation, which could lead to binding arbitration.

The former congressman previously was the center of controversy when in September 2002 he visited Iraq – at the behest of Saddam Hussein, according to some reports. Bonior traveled to Iraq along with fellow congressmen Jim McDermott and Mike Thompson.

Prior to the trip, the three politicians issued a joint press release, posted on their respective congressional websites, explaining their visit was aimed at “gaining insight into the humanitarian challenges another war on Iraq would have on innocent Iraqis and the dangerous implications of a unilateral, preemptive strike on U.S. national security.”

After the trio’s trip generated criticism, with one magazine, the Weekly Standard, coining them the “Baghdad Democrats” and “Baghdad boys,” Bonior claimed to the U.S. media the visit was about ensuring freedom of access to Hussein’s suspected weapons facilities.

“We wanted to impress upon the Iraqi government and the people of Iraq how important it was for them to allow unconditional, unfettered, unrestricted access to the inspectors,” Bonior said.

But Bonior and the other congressmen didn’t seem bothered when, during their trip, the Iraqi state-run media painted their visit as a show of support for Hussein’s regime.

The Iraq Daily, published by Hussein’s Ministry of Information, reportedly printed daily updates of the trip, including in English. One Sept. 30 report stated, “the members of the U.S. Congress delegation have underlined that this visit aims to get acquainted with the truth of Iraq’s people sufferings due to ongoing embargo which caused shortage in food and medicine for all Iraqi people.”

The report was carried alongside another article boasting of Hussein’s support for Palestinian terror organizations.

The Weekly Standard highlighted how, upon touching down in Iraq on Sept. 27, Iraqi Satellite Channel Television reported the congressional visitors would be brought to Iraqi hospitals “to see the suffering caused by the unjust embargo and the shortage of medicines and medical supplies. Congressman Jim McDermott told reporters upon arrival at Saddam International Airport that the delegation members reject the policy of aggression dominating the U.S. administration.”

In 2002, WND reported former FBI officials charged that Bonior, while in Congress, had hampered efforts to investigate terrorist suspects in Detroit.

Next: New “Grassroots” Resistance of American Citizens Opposed to Obama’s Socialist Agenda!

Source: Grassfire.Org   Sign the Petition Now!

Obama’s Nation Has Just Begun

Join The Resistance 

Welcome to Obama’s nation…

The “transformational” figure who will “change the world” is now in charge, and he’s on a       mission. Emboldened by an overwhelming electoral victory and a near-supermajority in      Congress, President-elect   Obama and his allies are preparing to implement his liberal,           “post-American” agenda. Simply put, what President-elect Obama and the Pelosi-Reid        Congress have in store has the potential to rapidly move America to the socialist Left.  

 1 million citizens resisting…

Who can stop the Obama agenda? Only an unprecedented idea-based Resistance from      freedom-loving citizens can prevent the full implementation of Obama’s march to the Left.         That’s why Grassfire.org is seeking to identify and mobilize grassroots citizens who will               Join The Resistance— an alliance of patriotic, resilient and determined conservatives who              will not forsake their principles. Our goal?

One million citizens joining together by Inauguration Day, January 20, 2009.

The Resistance States:

As an American citizen, while I will show respect to President-elect Obama,                                        I oppose the far-Left and socialistic elements that comprise the centerpiece                                       of his agenda. I recognize that it will take a patriotic and resilient Citizen                                Resistance to block implementation of this agenda and I join with others who                             oppose these threats to our liberties.

Specifically, I Resist:

Socialistic wealth redistribution including any and all tax increases and big-government welfare programs.

 

Silencing conservatives through the Fairness Doctrine and other efforts that restrict free speech.

 

Open border anarchy including amnesty for illegal aliens and promotion of multi-nation “unions”.

 

Government-run health care that weakens our system and imposes more tax burdens on citizens.

 

Weakening of our military through rapid pullback from Iraq, defunding our troops and overall disarmament.

 

Social liberalism including radical pro-abortion agenda, the end of marriage and the homosexual agenda.

 

Liberal court activism that undermines faith, family and liberties while expanding government control.

 

Post-American globalism that diminishes our global role and threatens our national sovereignty.

 

Environmental extremism, the CO2 tax,
undermining coal and nuclear, and bans on
exploration.

Sign The Petition – Join The Resistance!

  

 

Weakening the 2nd Amendment through unconstitutional gun laws that take away or penalize us for owning firearms and our right to defend our family, our property, and ourselves.

Sign The Petition – Join The Resistance!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • More
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...

Gold Report: Sean Rakhimov: Stock Market Will Recover; Economic Crisis Far from Over

02 Tuesday Dec 2008

Posted by jschulmansr in commodities, Copper, Currency and Currencies, Finance, Fundamental Analysis, gold, hard assets, inflation, Investing, investments, Latest News, Markets, mining stocks, precious metals, silver, Stocks, Technical Analysis, Today, U.S. Dollar, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on Gold Report: Sean Rakhimov: Stock Market Will Recover; Economic Crisis Far from Over

Tags

agricultural commodities, alternate energy, Austrian school, banking crisis, banks, bear market, Bollinger Bands, bull market, capitalism, central banks, China, Comex, commodities, communism, Copper, Currencies, currency, deflation, depression, diamonds, dollar denominated, dollar denominated investments, economic, economic trends, economy, financial, Forex, futures, futures markets, gold, gold miners, hard assets, heating oil, India, inflation, investments, Keith Fitz-Gerald, market crash, Markets, mining companies, Moving Averages, natural gas, oil, palladium, Peter Schiff, physical gold, platinum, platinum miners, precious metals, price, price manipulation, prices, producers, production, protection, rare earth metals, recession, risk, run on banks, safety, Saudi Arabia, Sean Rakhimov, silver, silver miners, socialism, sovereign, spot, spot price, stagflation, Technical Analysis, timber, U.S. Dollar, volatility, warrants, Water

Gold Report: Sean Rakhimov Stock Market Will Recover; Economic Crisis Far From Over

Souce: The Gold Report

By: Sean Rakhimov of Silver Strategies.Com

 

As SilverStrategies.com editor Sean Rakhimov tells us in this exclusive interview with The Gold Report, the economic crisis may go on for a generation but the market is a separate animal that will stir back to life sooner. He expects physical gold and silver to lead the parade, with base metals lagging 12-18 months behind, followed by share price recovery for the majors and on down the line. When picking stocks to buy now, he says investors have to decide for themselves whether a company will survive the washout; it may be tough going from here to there, but sticking with survivors should prove beneficial in the long run.The Gold Report: Let’s start with your take on where are we today, what has happened, and where we’re going from here.

Sean Rakhimov: Basically we’re in a situation that we’ve long expected. We all anticipated a big financial crisis, all sorts of problems, an end-of-the-world type of scenario—not literally, but the world as we know it. And I think we’re there. This is the big one and it’s for real. Where we go from here is largely a function of what the powers-that-be will do. We have some idea of what they will do; they will do all the things that will make it worse. I go by the theory that they will always do the right thing, but only after they exhaust all other options.

TGR: When you say the big one, how much further are you expecting both the markets and the international financials to erode?

SR: The markets are a separate story. Don’t confuse what the markets will do with the general crisis or economic situation. Markets are a different animal; they can do all kinds of things that do not fit into your thinking or should not have happened given the economy or the political situation, or what-have-you. I want to be clear on that so that people don’t assume that if I say, “Oh, this is going to last a while, that automatically means the market is going to not recover for a long time.” The economic crisis, I think, is going to last for a generation. I foresee a twofold crisis here, or maybe three stages. The first one is what we’re going through right now – a debt crisis.

At some point down the line we’re going to have a currency crisis, where the dollar will stop being the reserve currency of the world. I don’t know how long before that happens. It’s a matter of whoever runs first to the door, basically. I was just reading some articles. Iran is converting their foreign exchange reserves into gold. China is trying to do some of that. It only takes a few of these until there’s a domino effect and when that happens, things should play out quickly.

TGR: What do you mean “play out quickly”?

SR: This crisis, I think, has been a good example, where within three months we ended up in a completely different environment. If the dollar stops being the reserve currency of the world tomorrow, I expect things to happen quickly. It may take a decade until it gets started, but once it starts, I expect things to unravel quickly. The reason for that is we have maybe 20 to 30 major players in the world that can make a difference. I’m talking about countries and maybe some other entities such as sovereign funds. And I believe it’s going to be very difficult to bring everybody to the table and get them to agree on a plan that everybody would sign on to. Even if they did sign on, I think it’s going to be very difficult to make sure everybody sticks with it.

 

As soon as they break ranks, I think within six months the whole thing is going to break apart. Whatever accord they come up with, if it’s going to be Russia or China or somebody of that size, things are going to happen even quicker. If it’s going to be a smaller player like Iran or Venezuela, that may take a bit longer. The significance of it may be downplayed for a period of time. But ultimately I think most people understand the dire straits we’re in. At some point it’s going to be “everybody for themselves” and that’s when I think the current system is going to fall apart.

TGR: You’re suggesting the dollar will stop being the world currency and countries will make some attempt to come together to create the new world currency. Might that be gold or precious metals?

SR: I don’t think the adoption of gold or a derivative thereof as a reserve currency is going to come from governments, at least not voluntarily. Eventually, I think they will be forced to.

TGR: Wasn’t that the original part of the Bretton Woods agreement?

SR: Yes, it was, where the U.S. dollar was as good as gold and was convertible to gold, but we know how that ended.

TGR: You said this crisis could go on for a generation. That’s a long time.

SR: I foresee maybe several stages of this crisis unraveling and that’s why I say it’s going to take about a generation. As I said, the first one is the big debt crisis we have now. Maybe an extension of it will be some sort of a currency crisis. It’s not just a dollar that won’t be worth anything, but most other currencies as well. And then I believe what’s going to really, really change the environment and exacerbate the situation will be an oil crisis. I do expect oil to hit a new all-time high, say, by 2011. So within two to three years I would think that’s going to happen.

TGR: How low will we see oil go this time around?

SR: I don’t have a number on that because I don’t “buy these prices” on anything. These prices are largely a function of paper transactions, and yes, some transactions are taking place at these prices. Look at your Blackberry; a pound of copper is a brick that size. How much work, how much effort, how much energy goes into that and you can buy it for $1.50 or something in that range. Think to yourself, what else can you buy for $1.50? I was in Europe a few weeks ago. You can buy a bottle of water for €3, which is about $4. A cup of coffee costs that or more. I don’t know what you can get for $1.50 anymore; whereas you can get a piece of copper the size of your Blackberry for $1.61 today. The prices today are completely, absolutely bogus. Companies have to mine and sell their products at these prices. But if you recall our conversation in the last go-round, I said at some point I expect a complete reevaluation of most things, but commodities in particular. (Go to http://seekingalpha.com/article/84220-sean-rakhimov-3-digit-silver-ahead)

TGR: When you say commodities, are you doing base metals, precious metals?

SR: Everything. Everything that has an intrinsic value. Here’s the situation. Suppose three of us represent countries. One has oil, the other has wheat, and I have copper. If I want to buy your oil, I go back to my printer and print up as much money as I can and buy your oil. Well, the one with the wheat will do the same thing, print up as much money as possible and try to buy your oil. At some point people will stop accepting these currencies, whatever they are, because there’s no limit to them. Money is printed like leaflets. There’s no backing to it. When we get to the stage where there isn’t enough to go around—like you go to a gas station and you can’t get all the gas you need—the reevaluation will be forced on the market and will be forced on all the players. So, unless you have something else to offer, something of substance other than your paper money, I don’t think you’re going to get any of whatever it is you’re looking for.

So I do expect some time in the next decade that the oil market will fall apart. Whenever the deficit between production and consumption reaches a level where it’s going to start to have severe impact on availability and price, I think countries will go to direct contracts. That would be nothing new; such markets exist today, say, in uranium, where direct contracts are the main market and the futures market is basically an addendum. It’s more of a financial management tool for participants, rather than the market that determines anything significant.

TGR: At what level might the supply deficit trigger direct contract transactions in oil?

SR: Right now the supply and demand is about 85 million barrels a day supply against 87 million roughly in consumption. Suppose those numbers get to 90 and 95 (million barrels a day of consumption). At some point the shortage will become so severe that it’s going to wreak havoc in the marketplace. Those who have the oil will start to choose who they sell it to and in exchange for what. And I don’t think it’s going to be paper. That’s my longer term outlook.

TGR: What should investors be doing?

SR: It depends on the timeframe. If you’re talking about stocks, investors should take a hard look at their portfolios and ask themselves one question. Go through each stock and say, “Is this company going to be around on the other side of this financial crisis?” It may take six months; it may take three years for all I know. But if the company survives this current situation, I believe the benefits are going to be tremendous. Unfortunately, getting from here to there will be tough. It is already very, very difficult to get any kind of financing. And as we know, the mining (exploration) sector lives by it for the most part. A lot of these projects require large capital expenditure, either for exploration or development. Otherwise, they can’t do it.

TGR: Have you gone through your grid and come up with a list of companies that make the grade?

SR: I would be reluctant to discuss specific companies, particularly because investing is about the investor. If you want a simple version, stick with the major blue chips—but even then, survival is not a given. For instance, a company like Teck Cominco Ltd. (TSX:TCK.A) (TSX:TCK.B) (NYSE:TCK) is in a serious situation and the stock has plunged dramatically; it’s been one of the blue chips for the longest time and they’re a very conservative company.

TGR: Any other suggestions?

SR: If you need a guideline, the way I expect the market to play out going forward is for gold and silver to come back first. Base metals will probably lag behind by about a year to 18 months. When I say “come back,” I mean this downtrend in their price in the marketplace will reverse. Within two or three quarters after that, majors such as Newmont Mining Corp. (NYSE:NEM) and Barrick Gold Corp. (NYSE:ABX) will start making profits, good profits, large profits. Through that, I think their share price will come back and then they will turn around and buy juniors that survive this crisis on the cheap to justify those share prices. That’s the basic scenario I’m going by.

TGR: So you say first the bullion itself.

SR: First the bullion itself. You can never go wrong with that.

TGR: Despite the pullback we’ve encountered? Both gold and silver suffered during this asset devaluation.

SR: Well, yes and no. In retrospect in a perfect world it would have been wise to sell our gold and silver and their stocks and go into cash and try to buy them later on the cheap. In the real world, it doesn’t work like that. One thing to remember is gold and silver are the only markets that are driven by fear. We saw a good manifestation of that a couple of months ago, when gold shot up $90 in one day. We’ll see more days like that. In fact, it could be tomorrow for all I know, or the day after.

TGR: Do you see a specific catalyst for this?

SR: Not specific. It can be anything—war with Iran; some big banks going under; another country defaulting on its obligations. It can be a major investor like a sovereign wealth fund going to 50% gold or something. It can be absolutely anything. Now the trick here is gold and silver markets are not based on large amounts of buying. Let’s say tomorrow Warren Buffet says he’s going to buy $10 billion worth of gold. Immediately the supply is going to dry up. People who have gold will say, “Wait a minute, we’re not selling. The price is going up.” So the effect of a single event like that in the gold and silver space can reach far beyond what it would in any other market.

It is important to remember you don’t want to be in and out of assets of this type on a whim. Even if it takes a year, even if you have corrections like this, for my investment strategy I do not believe that gold and silver are amenable to buying and selling as are assets in other markets. Better to treat them like insurance, where you have it in good times and bad times. It won’t take a lot of buying to push these metals back up. And even though the metal prices have come down, if anything, demand for gold and silver has increased.

TGR: Evidenced by trying to find some coins.

SR: Absolutely and on any level. A week or two ago I was talking to a gentleman in London who runs a business that basically allows people to invest in gold. He told me that the gold he has in storage for his investors has reached some 11.5 tons in about 2.5 years. This is just one market participant out of who-knows-how-many and he deals mostly with retail investors. I believe the demand is there now and is only going to increase. Our current situation is going to add to that, not subtract from it.

Today’s metals prices are absolutely bogus, as is the price for oil. Yes, you can buy it at that price, but that is not what it’s worth. Right now oil is trading much, much cheaper than water, maybe one-third of the price of water. It should not be possible. I don’t believe in the rational market theory. I think the market is always wrong in the short term.

TGR: If people are looking at rolling money back into investments once the craziness stops, you say a logical sequence is to put some in bullion first and wait a little bit, buy some majors and wait a little bit, and then look at the juniors?

SR: That’s always been the theory. My views have not changed. If you asked me a year ago, I would have told you the exact same thing, so this is not trying to adjust my position based on current developments in the market. But in my opinion, that progression is how the market is going to move forward.

TGR: Doug Casey’s current philosophy is one-third cash, one-third bullion, one-third stocks. Would you agree, or are you saying to get it all in bullion for right now? Let’s say you have a high tolerance for speculation, risk taking. Where would you be?

SR: If you can get bullion at anything close to spot prices, you should buy as much as you plan to buy. I don’t endorse investors paying 50% premium, but I do believe in percentage terms the premiums will shrink at some point.

TGR: So would you buy Central Fund of Canada (AMEX:CEF)? Maybe half physical and half stock?

SR: Yes, I would, absolutely. And as far as stocks are concerned, it goes back to asking yourself that one question: “Is this company going to be around on the other side of this financial crisis?” If it is, by all means, buy some. I would recommend—as always, this is nothing new for me—dollar cost averaging. Whether you want to buy 1,000 shares or 10,000 shares, split it into five or six segments and buy one part every month or so.

The other thing is to reexamine your outlook or your investment horizon. You have to be prepared to not make any money for maybe about three years at least. I’m not saying that’s what’s going to happen, but you have to be prepared for that. Going in, you have to believe in this. I often use marriage as an example. You marry for the rest of your life, even if you end up getting divorced next year.

TGR: Things can change.

SR: Things can change. You can learn things you didn’t know. You may have other factors to deal with that don’t have to do with your position. But ultimately you have to believe in the company or the investment you’re making, and you have to give yourself at least three years to sit on it and maybe take some severe losses.

TGR: Speaking of severe losses, seeing billions evaporate this year has been a humbling experience.

SR: It is and it isn’t.

TGR: Tell us about the “isn’t.” We know about the “is.”

SR: The “isn’t” part is we all knew big problems would be coming down the line. And we knew why. Some of us discussed doomsday scenarios. I think where we went wrong is we did not prepare accordingly. A couple of months ago I wrote an article to that effect. It was called The Trouble with Forecasting. Basically the argument I was making is we knew that things would get bad, really bad. We should have believed our own predictions. There would have been no downside if we had been more conservative, more careful.

TGR: Can you give us any names based on various categories—senior producers, junior producers, exploration?

SR: I can flip that and tell you which companies I own. I own a good position in Pan American Silver Corp. (Nasdaq:PAAS) (TSX:PAA). I own a position in Silver Wheaton Corp. (NYSE:SLW), Hecla Mining. Those three I am comfortable will survive this crisis. One step down in terms of size and presence in the market, I own shares of First Majestic, IMPACT Silver and Minera Andes. Then if you go one step down below from that, companies with no production, I own shares of Esperanza and Silvercrest. I’ll leave it at that. Obviously, I own a lot of other different stocks, but I am trying to protect potential investors so I’m trying to be conservative here.

TGR: Tell us first about the one you mentioned last. What do you like about Silvercrest Mines Inc. (TSX.V:SVL)?

SR: The best thing about Silvercrest is management. And they do have a sizeable deposit, something on the order of 100 million ounces in Mexico. They have advanced studies, including, I believe, a feasibility study. They do need to build a mine. I don’t think it’s going to be an overly expensive mine and they don’t need too much lead time. They probably can be in production sometime in 2010, or maybe even sooner. But management is the key. I did buy that stock at well over $1. It’s probably half that today, maybe lower. But this is the type of company I believe will survive this crisis, come out on the other side and be one of the beneficiaries of whatever turnaround we see.

TGR: Esperanza Silver Corp. (TSX.V:EPZ)?

SR: Esperanza is a similar story. I like the management, very conservative. This is a pure exploration company. They do not plan to be in production, not that I know of. They have discovered two deposits: one in Peru and one in Mexico. I think the deposit in Mexico is about a million ounces of gold. In Peru, which should be roughly three quarters of a million ounces of gold, they have a JV with Silver Standard. That one is a higher grade. This is a grassroots exploration company, they like finding deposits. They found two in the recent past, so I expect more good things from them.

TGR: Minera Andes Inc. (TSX:MAI) (OTCBB:MNEAF)?

SR: Minera Andes is one of the companies that doesn’t have a high profile, but one of my favorites. It’s been my favorite for about five years now. Again, very good management, very low key. They focus on getting things done and not talking big, not too promotional. They have a mine in production that’s joint-ventured with Hochschild Mining (LSE:HOC) (which is a large silver producer) in Argentina. They have another project that they recently put out a resource calculation for—a copper project, which is a joint venture with Xstrata. Xstrata is a very large company, so this is another team that knows how to come up with good assets. I think they’ll also survive this crisis and will benefit from whatever upside in the future.

TGR: What about Minera Andes makes it one of your favorites?

SR: The management. Again, the management is very conservative, very low key, very non-promotional, very down to business. You just get a feeling for people; you see them so many times, talk to them, see how they go about their business and how they deliver. If they get where they plan to get and what they do to get there, it gives you a level of comfort. Minera Andes is one of those that has been through thick and thin and I think they’re definitely out of the woods in terms of whether they’re going to survive.

TGR: IMPACT Silver (TSX.V: IPT). What’s the story there?

SR: I should mention that I am somewhat biased, in that I am a consultant to the company. But on the flip side, I like them for reasons other than that. It’s one of my largest silver holdings. They’re in production in Mexico, very conservative management. They have a good cash position, one of the lowest costs of production. It’s a small producer, at this time. They produce about a million ounces of silver equivalent. But management is seasoned, been around for quite some time and they know how to operate a mine. Their motto is: “a business has to make money, otherwise it’s a hobby”. They bought an old mine in Mexico, and been profitable from day one. They’re still profitable, even in this environment, and I also believe they are going to be one of the ones that will come through this.

TGR: I’ve been hearing a lot about First Majestic (TSX:FR) (PK SHEET:FRMSF).

SR: First Majestic, I think, is one that has the highest chances of surviving this crash or this downturn, however you want to call it. I also think this is one that will get bigger, either through acquisitions or organic growth. I know the gentleman who started this company, Keith Neumeyer, very well, known him for years. Very ambitious and aggressive in executing his business plan. This company should produce on the order of about 5 million ounces of silver equivalent this year, maybe just under that. This has been accomplished in about four years. It’s no small task to get from zero to 5 million ounces in about four years. I also like First Majestic’s other principal, Ramon Davila, who is the most dynamic mining executive I’ve seen by far. He is the one who oversees the operations in Mexico, and is the one who built up Mexican operations for Pan American Silver in the past.

TGR: He’s got experience.

SR: Experience, knowledge and contacts; a very, very successful mining executive. First Majestic is going to be around for quite some time unless, of course, it’s going to be taken over by a major, which would be a compliment to get to a point where you are an attractive target to a major. For juniors that’s often of the ultimate goal. I’m not saying that’s the goal for First Majestic, but it’s like Rick Rule says, you build a company to keep and somebody else will want it. So I think First Majestic is going places.

TGR: And they’ve got the capital to weather the storm.

SR: I believe they have about $26 million in the bank. It’s a well established company in terms of production and operations. They have about 300 million ounces in resources. They’ve done their drilling, they’ve got four mines in production right now. They’re undertaking a major expansion at one of the projects in Northern Mexico. They’re basically going about their business according to plan. Maybe they’re making some minor adjustments to cut costs here and there, but ultimately this company is going to grow.

TGR: What’s going on with Hecla Mining Company (NYSE:HL)? Is it just silver and the industrial metal and, therefore, demand is off and prices are off?

SR: All of the above, but I think one of the reasons that is not well understood is that Hecla is one of the very few companies in this space that’s listed on the New York Stock Exchange. So it’s one of the more visible ones and I think they take it on the chin harder than the rest, particularly because of that listing. The way mainstream investors work is, “Everything is going down, so let’s short commodities. What do we have to play with?” And Hecla inevitably pops up on that list. I think that’s part of the reason it’s been beaten down so badly. Hecla is one of the best underground mine operators, so I think they will survive. The company’s been around for 100 years, so I’m sure they can weather this one—at least that’s the way I’m betting. If I’m wrong, then so be it.

This is why I am reluctant to discuss specific companies. If you’re investing in the mining sector, you have to be prepared to make mistakes and you will definitely make mistakes in many of them. The question is, of course, in the grand scheme of things, are you making progress or not, are you making money or not. So long as your portfolio is growing, you could do much, much worse than Hecla.

TGR: Wouldn’t you think the darling of the sector would hold up better?

SR: It works both ways. It would have been darling in good times and I think it will be again. At some point they will benefit from that New York Stock Exchange listing. But in bad times, they take it on the chin harder than the rest.

TGR: Another company that’s getting some conversation is Silver Recycling Company(TSX.V:TSR), which is a different play than mining. What do you know about them?

SR: Silver Recycling has been another favorite of mine. The businesses they currently control are profitable and they’re still doing okay. This has been one of the attractions when we first looked at it. Unfortunately, they’ve been one of the victims of the current credit environment. While they do have self-sustaining operations, they need to raise capital to make acquisitions. If they are successful in that task, and I have to believe they will be, it’s going to be a very, very pleasant surprise. It’s beaten down with the rest of the sector right now, but the business plan is sound. I am still optimistic about this company. In fact, I’m trying to help them get through this. By the way, chances are you can buy some silver from them because they’ve responded to the market demand and produce 100-ounce silver bars and silver rounds, which they sell to investors.

TGR: Right. At a premium to spot, right?

SR: Yes, at a premium to spot, I bought some myself, so I don’t think the premiums are outrageous at all or out of line with the market.

Not all of Sean Rakhimov’s dot-com dabblings paid off, with at least one important exception. He traces his interested in financial markets to that era, when he joined a software development company in 1996. In the years that followed, he designed financial systems to support different areas of the investment banking business. He seized the opportunity to learn about options trading, securities lending, payments processing, clearing and settlement, fixed income securities and margin transactions. He’s not only been putting those learnings to work ever since, but also sharing them with others, with writings published on such internet portals as Le Metropole Café, 321Gold.com, SilverMiners.com and—of course—The Gold Report. Sean, who has been involved in a number of research projects for renowned silver guru and newsletter writer David Morgan, now publishes and edits his own website, SilverStrategies.com.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • More
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...

GoldMoney – Alert!

02 Tuesday Dec 2008

Posted by jschulmansr in Bollinger Bands, capitalism, commodities, Copper, Currency and Currencies, deflation, Finance, Fundamental Analysis, gold, inflation, Investing, investments, Latest News, Markets, mining stocks, Moving Averages, oil, precious, precious metals, silver, Stocks, Technical Analysis, Today, U.S. Dollar, Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

agricultural commodities, alternate energy, Austrian school, banking crisis, banks, bear market, Bollinger Bands, bull market, capitalism, central banks, China, Comex, commodities, communism, Copper, Currencies, currency, deflation, depression, diamonds, dollar denominated, dollar denominated investments, economic, economic trends, economy, financial, Forex, futures, futures markets, gold, gold miners, hard assets, heating oil, India, inflation, investments, James Turk, Keith Fitz-Gerald, market crash, Markets, mining companies, Moving Averages, natural gas, oil, palladium, Peter Schiff, physical gold, platinum, platinum miners, precious metals, price, price manipulation, prices, producers, production, protection, rare earth metals, recession, risk, run on banks, safety, Saudi Arabia, silver, silver miners, socialism, sovereign, spot, spot price, stagflation, Technical Analysis, timber, U.S. Dollar, volatility, warrants, Water

GoldMoney – Alert!

James Turk

A Successful Test of Support

In the last alert I referred to “the growing body of evidence” indicating that “the correction in gold that began after making a new record high in March above $1020 is ending.” Importantly, this point is confirmed by the following monthly chart presenting gold’s rate of exchange against the US dollar.

To explain this key development in technical terms, after making a new record high this past March, gold retraced back toward its previous record (marked in the above chart by the dashed line). Gold did the same thing back in 1978 after breaking above $200 in July that year (marked by the red circle), its previous record high. Gold climbed another 17% through October 1978, and then corrected the following month by testing $200. Support at that level held.

From there gold never looked back. It began a stellar advance that took it to $681.50, its month-end close in January 1980, the level that was just successfully tested.

The big difference between now and back then is the time needed to re-test support. The correction lasted only one month in 1978, but is now already eight months old. There are a number of reasons for this different result, but one is not the gold cartel. It was active back in the late 1970s too, dishoarding 775 tonnes from the International Monetary Fund in a vain and useless attempt to make the dollar look better by trying to cap the gold price.

The clear conclusion is that governments, even when they coordinate their effort, cannot in the end stop the market from bidding up the price of gold. So it is logical to expect a new record high for gold soon against the US dollar. It is noteworthy that gold closed this past month at new record highs against the British pound, Canadian dollar, Indian rupee and South African rand.

The driving force to exit national currencies and to buy gold is the same now as it was in the 1970s. Gold is better money than national currencies.


Published by GoldMoney
Copyright © 2008. All rights reserved.
Edited by James Turk, alert@goldmoney.com

Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • More
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...

Don’t Give Up on Gold Just Yet!+ Peter Schiff Bonus!

02 Tuesday Dec 2008

Posted by jschulmansr in capitalism, commodities, Copper, Currency and Currencies, deflation, Finance, Fundamental Analysis, gold, hard assets, inflation, Investing, investments, Latest News, Markets, mining stocks, Moving Averages, oil, precious metals, silver, Stocks, Technical Analysis, Today, U.S. Dollar, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on Don’t Give Up on Gold Just Yet!+ Peter Schiff Bonus!

Tags

agricultural commodities, alternate energy, Austrian school, banking crisis, banks, bear market, Bollinger Bands, bull market, capitalism, central banks, China, Comex, commodities, communism, Copper, Currencies, currency, deflation, depression, diamonds, dollar denominated, dollar denominated investments, economic, economic trends, economy, financial, Forex, futures, futures markets, gold, gold miners, hard assets, heating oil, India, inflation, investments, Keith Fitz-Gerald, market crash, Markets, mining companies, Moving Averages, natural gas, oil, palladium, Peter Schiff, physical gold, platinum, platinum miners, precious metals, price, price manipulation, prices, producers, production, protection, rare earth metals, recession, risk, run on banks, safety, Saudi Arabia, silver, silver miners, socialism, sovereign, spot, spot price, stagflation, Technical Analysis, timber, U.S. Dollar, volatility, warrants, Water

Don’t Give Up on Gold Just Yet – Seeking Alpha

By: Keith Fitz-Gerald of Monday Morning

If you were counting on gold to boost your returns this year, chances are you’ve been cruelly disappointed. In fact, when it comes to gold-related investments, virtually every category is down, making this one of the worst years in history for gold investors.

So, why is it that the largest of the large futures traders have some of the lowest net short positions in years? And what does this tell us about gold prices in the near future?

I’ll get to that in a minute. But first …

What Went Wrong?

In my analysis, I’ve identified the three missteps most investors made. First, investors did what they’d been told to do. But in their panic, they flocked to gold on the assumption that the yellow metal would perform as advertised. They forgot the “safety first” strategy that we’ve emphasized this year – one that included a safer, more-conservative way of buying gold.

Strike one.

Adding insult to injury, very few investors (Money Morning readers aside) failed to understand that the massive “de-leveraging” process that’s been part and parcel of the global financial crisis would put downward pressure on virtually every asset class at the same time. And that includes gold. As we’ve seen in the last few months, during times of global panic, investors around the world want the safety of U.S. dollars – and a lot of them – even more than they want gold right now.

Strike two.

But, above all else, most investors failed to realize that gold, just like any other asset, produces the best returns when it is attractively priced. So most investors made the classic mistake of piling in on the basis of performance. In other words, they bought in at the top.
Strike three.

What’s Changed?

During times of crisis, investors have been taught to latch onto those asset classes with the highest relative stability – including gold and precious metals. More often than not, investors who have followed these time-proven practices have been handsomely rewarded for doing so.

This time around, however, the parameters have changed, as the increased use of such “derivative” securities as “credit default swaps” has exacerbated the fallout from the global financial crisis, and touched off the aforementioned de-leveraging process. As asset markets have melted down, hedge funds, financial institutions worldwide, and even government-controlled sovereign wealth funds have taken heavy losses, forcing them to deal with unprecedented margin calls and redemption requests. Because this has never before been part of their crisis-management process, institutional investors have engaged in a massive, concerted effort to sell anything that’s at all liquid – including gold.

Making matters worse, the so-called “carry trade” unwound with a vengeance, forcing offshore investors to buy U.S. dollars in order to offset the sell-off of dollar-denominated assets. In contrast to what you’re hearing on the news, this really is not a sign that the dollar is any stronger than other currencies. Instead it signifies that the greenback is still the global currency of choice – much to the chagrin of Russia, Venezuela and others who begrudgingly tie themselves to it.

It also highlights something that most investors forget, or perhaps never knew in the first place. For better or worse, the dollar is the most liquid of the world’s reserve currencies. Part of that’s because many assets – especially oil – are still predominately traded in dollars.

The problem is that the dollar’s healthy appearance may be just that – an appearance that covers up an inner ill health. These still-hidden maladies have been worsened by the recent machinations of “Bailout Ben” – U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke – and U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry M. “Hank” Paulson Jr., whose fix-it programs have created a financial Frankenstein that will chase American taxpayers for years.

When the dollar was rallying back in May, and many experts were lauding the move as a turnaround in the making for the long-languishing U.S. currency, we warned investors not to be taken in by the market’s head fake. There were just too many underlying problems for the dollar’s rally to be sustainable. Ultimately, that rally sputtered, and the dollar reversed course and continued its decline.

This time, we again suspect that the dollar is rising too far too fast and that the spike we’ve seen in recent months may be nothing more than a flameout in the making.

However, given the relationship between the greenback and the yellow metal, this leads us to believe that gold could move higher next year if investors lose faith that the dollar merits their nearly exclusive attention right now.

Two pieces of closely related information appear to support this theory:

First, even though gold prices have tanked – a reality that under ordinary circumstances would mean more supply is available – dealers of gold bullion have experienced widespread physical shortages during the third quarter, according to the World Gold Council, a top trade association for the gold-mining industry. That, in turn, led dealers to both charge more and pay more than the spot price would indicate. Particularly strong demand was noted in China, India and the Middle East.

According to a Nov. 19 press release, the World Gold Council also noted that identifiable investment demand for gold in the third quarter was up $10.7 billion to 382 tons – double the levels of a year ago. At the same time, retail investment demand rose 121% to 232 tons, with especially for gold bars and gold coins reported in the Swiss, German and U.S. markets.

At the same time, the SPDR Gold Trust (GLD) – the largest exchange-traded fund (ETF) that invests in the yellow metal – noted that it now holds 755.06 tons of gold in trust, up 6.12 tons from the prior week. This is significant because authorized market participants like GLD have to add metal and increase their trading float when buying pressure is higher than selling pressure. This suggests that gold may be reaching the end of its downside run and that it may behave more like investors expect it to in the months ahead.

Second, we find it especially interesting that the largest of the commercial futures traders now hold the smallest net short positions they have held in several years. According to the U.S. Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), large commercial traders combined net short positions reflect only 71,116 contracts net short, one of the lowest net short positions the CFTC has reported since January 2006.

Historically, low net short positions have proven to be bullish influences. And net short levels of less than 30% total open interest have proven to be especially bullish.

The wild card here, of course, is that the markets are working through a de-leveraging process that’s far from over, meaning that normal supply and demand relationships are out of whack. Longer-term, however, everything we know about those relationships still appears to be intact.

That’s why we suggest that investors make gold a part of their investment program – if for no other reason than we are approaching levels typically associated with higher, rather than lower, returns.

But we can’t just pile in.

Short-term market conditions will transform anything other than a measured approach into a hazardous foray.

That’s why, when it comes to gold, we’ve repeatedly recited the market mantra: “Gold works over time, but not all the time.” [For insights on actual gold-investing strategies, check out the Money Morning special investment research report, “The Best Way to Use Gold to Protect Your Portfolio and Profit.” The report is free of charge.]

[Editor’s Note: Money Morning Investment Director Keith Fitz-Gerald is one of the top investment commentators in the global marketplace today. A noted columnist and a highly sought after speaker, Fitz-Gerald is also a gifted forecaster. Indeed, he’s especially distinguished himself during the current financial crisis, having told investors to expect historic levels of market volatility and having accurately predicted such crisis “aftershocks” as the big spike in energy and commodity prices that took place earlier this year. A new Money Morning report identifies five such aftershocks that are still to come, and explains how savvy investors can employ such “trigger events” as potential gateways to major profits. To read this report, which details all five of the aftershocks to expect, please click here. And don’t forget to check out Fitz-Gerald’s recently published 2009 stock market forecast, part of Money Morning’s ongoing “Outlook 2009” economic forecast series.]

=====================================================

Dare Something Worthy Today Too! Bonus! Peter Schiff

Peter Schiff Was Right!

Peter Schiff Analogies

 

$2000 Gold in 2009 says Peter Schiff

Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • More
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...

Obama, Latest Birth Certificate News – Obama Watch

02 Tuesday Dec 2008

Posted by jschulmansr in 2008 Election, Barack Obama, Currency and Currencies, Electoral College, Finance, Free Speech, id theft, Investing, investments, Joe Biden, John McCain, Latest News, Markets, Politics, Presidential Election, psychology, Sarah Palin, Today, u.s. constitution, U.S. Dollar, Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

2008 Election, Barack Dunham, Barack Hussein Obama, Barack Obama, Barry Dunham, Barry Soetoro, capitalism, Chicago Tribune, Columbia University, Currency and Currencies, D.c. press club, Dr. Ron Polarik, Electoral College, Electors, Finance, fraud, Free Speech, gold, Harvard Law School, hawaii, id theft, Indonesia, Indonesian Citizenship, Investing, investments, janet porter, Joe Biden, John McCain, Latest News, legal documents, Markets, name change, natural born citizen, Oath of Allegiance of the President of the United State, Occidental College, Phillip Berg, Politics, poser, Presidential Election, Sarah Palin, socialism, Stocks, Today, treason, u.s. constitution, U.S. Dollar, Uncategorized, voter fraud, we the people foundation; faith2action

Obama, DNC elude citizenship lawsuit deadline

My Obama Watch Central – jschulmansr

Obama, DNC elude citizenship lawsuit deadline
Solicitor general’s office dodges questions about birth certificate complaint

By Chelsea Schilling
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

President-elect Barack Obama and the Democratic National Convention

While the Federal Election Commission waived its right to respond to the complaint on Nov. 18, the solicitor general’s office is refusing to say whether the waiver was also filed on behalf of Obama and the DNC.Berg filed his petition on Oct. 30, and according to procedure, a response from the defendants was due today. But when WND contacted the U.S. Supreme Court and the solicitor general’s office, officials referenced the FEC’s waiver and dodged any questions about Barack Obama and the DNC filing separate responses.

America’s Right blogger and legal writer Jeff Schreiber has followed the case closely.

“There are a number of reasons why the respondents here would choose not to respond,” Schreiber speculated. “First, because the court only grants between 70 and 120 of the 8,000 or so petitions it receives every year, perhaps they just liked their odds of Berg’s petition getting denied. Second, because they have made arguments as to Berg’s lack of standing several times at the district court level and beyond, perhaps they felt as though any arguments had already been made and were available on the record. Or, perhaps the waiver shows that the FEC and other respondents do not take seriously the allegations put forth by Berg, and did not wish to legitimize the claims with a response.”

But one thing that is not clear is whether the FEC is filing for itself or on behalf of all respondents, he added.

FEC attorney Gregory G. Garre is listed as the only name under “Attorneys for Respondents.” There are no additional attorneys listed for Obama or the DNC – and the waiver was filed by “respondents Federal Election Commission, et. al,” suggesting the response was on behalf of other defendants as well.

Where’s the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. and thus a “natural-born American” as required by Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution? If you still want to see it, sign WND’s petition demanding the release of his birth certificate.

“As it were, the FEC’s attorney, Gregory Garre, is with the Solicitor General’s office, and does not represent Obama or the DNC,” Schreiber wrote. “While attorneys acting on behalf of a group of defendants or respondents is not necessarily rare, the difference here is the involvement of the Solicitor General’s office, a federal office.”

Court documents show the Federal Election Commission waived its right to respond on Nov. 18.

Berg told America’s Right he was taken aback when he learned that the FEC – a federal regulatory agency – had filed the waiver.

“I’m surprised because I think they should take the position that the Supreme Court should grant standing to us,” he said. “I think they have a responsibility not only to Phil Berg, but to all citizens of this country, to put forth a sense of balance which otherwise doesn’t seem to exist.

“However, if this was filed by the FEC on behalf of the DNC and Barack Obama too, it reeks of collusion,” he said, noting that the attorney from the solicitor general’s office should be representing federal respondents and not the DNC or Obama.

Imaging Guru- “Certification” of Birth Time, Location is Fake

 

By Bob Unruh
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

A guru on the “Certification of Live Birth” Barack Obama’s campaign posted online to rebut charges he is ineligible to be president due to the Constitution’s “natural born citizen” requirement says it’s a fake, and further, that such fraud is criminal.
The Obama campaign has told WND such allegations are “garbage,” but Dr. Ron Polarik, who holds a Ph.D. in instructional media specializing in computer technology such as printers, scanners and digital imaging, disagrees. His analyses have been posted online in a YouTube video, which also is embedded here:

 

 

He explained to WND his four months of research on the images, including nearly 1,000 test images using actual scans and photographs of real certifcates, reveal there are several “giveaways” on the image itself. For example, the document has gray and white between the lettering, not green pixels as the rest of the background document, suggesting someone cut-and-pasted or typed new information that was embedded on top of the background.

Where’s the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. and thus a “natural born American” as required by Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution? If you still want to see it, sign WND’s petition demanding the release of his birth certificate.

Also, Polarik said although the Obama form has a border and seal from 2008, it purportedly was obtained in 2007. He said the seal does not match seals on other documents from 2007, but does match those from 2008. His full report is posted at Polarik.blogtownhall.com.

In Polarik’s view, there has to be a significant reason for a political candidate and campaign to go to such lengths.

“Obviously, there’s something very critical to hide, or they wouldn’t have spent the million dollars in legal fees to prevent the release of his original birth certificate,” Polarik told WND.

“There’s absolutely something to hide,” he said. “If he was born in Hawaii they would have had a luau that would be continuing today.”Not that the people who voted for him would care,” he said, “but they used this forged document to convince the American voters.

“It’s a scary thought to have someone who essentially begins his presidency as a criminal,” he said, because the use of a faked document as identification is, in fact, a crime, he noted.

“It would be hard to perform as president from behind jail cell door at Leavenworth,” he said.

The video has Polarik’s face and voice disguised and he confirmed in talking with WND that he’s using an assumed name because of the threats he’s reported receiving.

Polarik said the issue of the birth location is a “chink” in Obama’s armor, but the Democrat also has declined to release information about his college years, about his selective service and about his passports, including on what nation’s passport he traveled to Pakistan two decades ago when it was illegal to go there as a U.S. citizen.

Polarik describes his findings and conclusions on the video.

WND columnist Janet Porter has written extensively about the birth certification issue.

“Look, we’re not asking for the world here. Neither is the Constitution. Some pretty basic requirements like being 35 years old, having 14 years residency in the United States, and being a natural born citizen. When Senator John McCain was questioned about it, he showed his birth certificate without hesitating. When Barack Obama was asked by courts including the U.S. Supreme Court, he ducked and hid behind the right to privacy,” she writes.

“Ironically, when Obama was running for the State Senate, he won by disqualifying every candidate who ran against him in the primary, including a guy who had been through a nasty and salacious divorce. Even though he had a small child who could be hurt by the information being made public, a court decided that the public’s right to know; outweighed this poor fella’s right to privacy, and he backed out. Obama clings to the ‘right to privacy’ regarding his own qualifications, just not his opponents.”

She also noted the issue won’t go away, and recommended a visit to ObamaForgery.com to review what’s happening.

“These are the facts,” she wrote. “The Constitution requires the president to be a natural born citizen. Obama’s grandmother said she was there when Barack was born in Kenya. Obama refuses to release his original birth certificate. Instead of a birth certificate, Obama’s campaign posted a certification given to those born abroad. Experts have called even that document an ‘obvious forgery.'”

“Our Constitution still matters,” she said.

Her group, Faith2Action, is working on funding for the purchase of time for a new television ad on the issue.

In the Philadelphia Bulletin, constitutional lawyer Edwin Vieira said a multitude of problems could result.

“Let’s assume he wasn’t born in the U.S.,” Vieira told the newspaper. “What’s the consequence? He will not be eligible. That means he cannot be elected validly. The people and the Electoral College cannot overcome this and the House of Representatives can’t make him president. So what’s the next step? He takes the oath of office, and assuming he’s aware he’s not a citizen, then it’s a perjured oath.

“He may have nominated people to different positions; he may have nominated people to the judicial branch, who may have been confirmed, they may have gone out on executive duty and done various things,” said Vieira. “The people that he’s put into the judicial branch may have decided cases, and all of that needs to be unzipped.”

“Let’s say we go a year into this process, and it all turns out to be a flim-flam,” he told the newspaper. “What’s the nation’s reaction to that? What’s going to be the reaction in the next U.S. election? God knows. It has almost revolutionary consequences, if you think about it.”

He continued, “[The birth certificate], in theory, should be there. What if it isn’t? Who knows, aside from Mr. Obama? Does Russian intelligence know it isn’t there? Does Chinese intelligence know it isn’t there? Does the CIA know that it isn’t there? Who is in a position to blackmail this fellow?”

Vieira expressed confidence Obama eventually will be forced to produce documentation.

“Let’s assume that an Obama administration passes some of these controversial pieces of legislation he has been promising to go for, like the FOCA (Freedom of Choice) Act,” he told the newspaper. “I would assume that some of those surely will have some severe civil or criminal penalties attached to them for violation. You are now the criminal defendant under this statute, which was passed by an Obama Congress and signed by President Obama. Your defense is that is not a statute because Mr. Obama is not the president. You now have a right and I have never heard this challenged, to subpoena in a criminal case, anyone who has relevant evidence relating to your defenses. And you can subpoena them duces tecum, meaning ‘you shall bring with you the documents.'”

WND founder and editor Joseph Farah has launched a program to allow concerned voters to express their desire directly to the U.S. Supreme Court for the issue to be resolved.

A conference among the justices is scheduled Friday on a New England challenge to Obama’s eligibility.

“The case is brought by Leo C. Donofrio against Nina Wells, the New Jersey secretary of state, and questions whether Obama is a ‘natural-born citizen’ as required by Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution,” Farah reported.

“It would seem a simple matter to resolve,” he said. “Barack Obama could have put this issue to rest long ago by producing a complete birth certificate from Hawaii. Instead, he has chosen to stonewall the matter, citing a website post of what can only be characterized as a partial representation of a birth certificate – one that has been criticized as a forgery.

“Meanwhile, some of Obama’s own Kenyan relatives claim to have been present at his birth in Mombasa. This controversy, which some have dismissed as frivolous, is as serious as the literal meaning of the Constitution itself.”

The nation’s Electoral College, the process through which Obama is to be formally voted as the next president, will meet Dec. 15, and his inaugural is scheduled Jan. 20.

Meanwhile, more than 125,000 have signed WND’s petition seeking full disclosure of Obama’s information.

The petition cites the U.S. Constitution’s requirement that no one can be sworn into office as president without being a natural born citizen. It also asserts there are questions about Obama’s reported Hawaii birth, that the Democrat has refused repeated calls to document his birth, that activist judges have declined to require him to shed light on the issue and that Hawaii – at the time of Obama’s birth – allowed parents whose children were born in other locations to register the birth there. 

WND’s petition is available online, and more information is available at this link.

 Make The Media Cover The Story of The Century! 

Janet Porter of Faith2Action

One of the most often asked questions regarding whether or not Barack Obama meets the constitutional requirements for the office of president is: “Why hasn’t the ‘mainstream’ media covered this?” Good question.

Well, one thing we found out in the last election is there isn’t anything “mainstream” about the “mainstream” media. There is no longer any doubt about their pro-Obama bias – even the Washington Post came out and admitted it. If it weren’t for WorldNetDaily, a few radio talk shows and some blogs, we wouldn’t even know about the constitutional crisis we’re in. Interestingly, these are the first things on the chopping block in an unchecked Obama administration.

Look, we’re not asking for the world here. Neither is the Constitution. Some pretty basic requirements like being 35 years old, having 14 years residency in the United States, and being a natural born citizen. When Sen. John McCain was questioned about it, he showed his birth certificate without hesitating. When Barack Obama was asked by courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, he ducked and hid behind the right to privacy.

Ironically, when Obama was running for the Illinois Senate, he won by disqualifying every candidate who ran against him in the primary, including a guy who had been through a nasty and salacious divorce. Even though he had a small child who could be hurt by the information being made public, a court decided that the public’s “right to know” outweighed this poor fella’s right to privacy, and he backed out. Obama clings to the “right to privacy” regarding his own qualifications, just not his opponents.

Sign the petition to demand the release of Barack Obama’s birth certificate.

The second most-asked question about Obama’s citizenship is: “Don’t you think someone would have found out the answer to these questions before now?” Also an outstanding question. Phil Berg, whose case is now before the U.S. Supreme Court, not only filed suit in August but also copied Democratic Party Chairman Howard Dean on the matter before Obama was chosen as the nominee. I would have thought that something as important as whether a potential nominee is qualified to serve in office might be worth a question or two prior to the party’s selection. But that information was ignored, and now they’re just hoping it will all go away.

It won’t. Not until Obama comes forward with the proof that the American people want and the Constitution demand.

But what can an ordinary citizen do to defend the Constitution? Instead of sitting on the sidelines wringing our hands, we can do something about it. If the “news” channels won’t cover what may be the biggest story of our lifetime, I say, let’s buy it. Help put this television ad on the air – watch it at ObamaForgery.com:

Heard the rumors about Barack Obama’s citizenship?These are the facts:

The Constitution requires the president to be a natural born citizen.

Obama’s grandmother said she there when Barack was born in Kenya.

Obama refuses to release his original birth certificate.

Instead of a birth certificate, Obama’s campaign posted a certification given to those born abroad.

Experts have called even that document an “obvious forgery.”

Obama attended school in Indonesia as Barry Soetoro, when only Indonesian citizens were permitted to attend.

Obama’s school records list his father as Lolo Soetoro and Obama’s citizenship as Indonesian.

Obama traveled to Pakistan in 1981 when it was illegal to enter as a U.S. citizen.

Sixteen lawsuits in 12 states and two cases before the Supreme Court now challenge Obama’s citizenship.

Fact: Our Constitution still matters.

http://www.obamaforgery.com

Illuminati Pictures, who produced the video of expert Ron Polarik, produced this ad that raises as many of the facts regarding Obama’s citizenship as one can fit in 60 seconds. Let’s let America hear them and add their voice to the 120,000 who signed the WND petition in the last few days.

Go to http://www.faith2action.org/ and watch the ad. Any Web donation to Faith2Action from now until Dec. 15 will go directly toward airtime to place this ad on television. How much is it going to take? Well, $12,000 buys a national 60-second ad on Fox News between 5 and 6 p.m. I say let’s buy a few of those and publicize it so the rest of the world finally hears about the constitutional crisis we’re in. Then, the Bill O’Reillys, Sean Hannitys and Rush Limbaughs may decide to cover the story of the century.

Sign the petition to demand the release of Barack Obama’s birth certificate.

 

 

 

 

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • More
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...

Mr. Obama; Don’t Miss Today’s Chicago Tribune!

01 Monday Dec 2008

Posted by jschulmansr in 2008 Election, Barack Obama, Currency and Currencies, Electoral College, Finance, Free Speech, id theft, Investing, investments, Joe Biden, John McCain, Latest News, Markets, Politics, Presidential Election, socialism, Stocks, u.s. constitution, U.S. Dollar, Uncategorized

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

2008 Election, Barack Dunham, Barack Hussein Obama, Barack Obama, Barry Dunham, Barry Soetoro, capitalism, Chicago Tribune, Columbia University, Currency and Currencies, D.c. press club, Electoral College, Electors, Finance, fraud, Free Speech, gold, Harvard Law School, hawaii, id theft, Indonesia, Indonesian Citizenship, Investing, investments, Joe Biden, John McCain, Latest News, legal documents, Markets, name change, natural born citizen, Oath of Allegiance of the President of the United State, Occidental College, Phillip Berg, Politics, poser, Presidential Election, Sarah Palin, socialism, Stocks, Today, treason, u.s. constitution, U.S. Dollar, Uncategorized, voter fraud, we the people foundation

Mr. Obama: Don’t Miss Today’s Chicago Tribune!

Source: We The People Foundation

MY OBAMA WATCH CENRAL – Jschulmansr

Full-Page Citizenship Challenge To Run Twice,

December 1st and 3rd

 

D.C. National Press Club Event: Dec 8th

 

An Open Letter to Barack Obama:

Are You A Natural Born Citizen of The United States?

Are You Legally Eligible To Hold The Office Of The President?

Our full-page Open Letter to Mr. Obama will be published in the Chicago Tribune on both Monday, December 1, 2008 and Wednesday, December 3, 2008. It will appear in the main news section. Click here to view a copy of the final ad.

Chicago is Mr. Obama’s hometown. His transition team is operating out of the Kluczynski Federal Building in downtown Chicago. He is known to be a regular reader of the Tribune, Chicago’s principal newspaper, with a daily circulation of over a half-million readers. 

The Open Letter to Mr. Obama is a formal Petition for a Redress (Remedy) for the alleged violation of the “natural born citizen” clause of the Constitution of the United States of America.
Mr. Obama is respectfully requested to direct the Hawaiian officials to provide access to his original birth certificate on December 5-7 by our team of forensic scientists, and to provide additional documentary evidence establishing his citizenship status prior to our Washington, D.C. press conference on December 8. 

A First Amendment Petition to any official of the Government for Redress of a violation of the Constitution is substantially different from the garden-variety political petitions frequently received by government officials. This Petition demands it be given the highest priority for an expedited review and official Response by Mr. Obama. 

As a formal “Notice of a Constitutional Violation,” the Petition naturally includes the People’s inherent Right to an official Response. As a time-sensitive, election related Petition involving the Office of the President, failure to Respond as requested would constitute an egregious breach of the public trust and confirm the certainty of a Constitutional crisis.

For the D.C. press conference the WTP Foundation has reserved the Edward R. Murrow Room at the National Press Club from 1-4 pm on Monday, December 8, 2008. We are hopeful that C-SPAN may cover what could be a pivotal, historic event.

The Petition for Redress/Open Letter to Mr. Obama is also expected to have a significant impact on the deliberations of the Electoral College as it proceeds toward selection of the U.S. President as provided for by the Constitution.

Many, many thanks to the many individuals who donated the money needed to cover the costs of publishing the Open Letter and conducting the Washington press conference.

We are now in the process of selecting the forensic scientists who would travel to Hawaii to examine Mr. Obama’s original birth certificate (assuming he responds to the Petition for Redress by directing the Hawaiian officials to provide access to the birth certificate).  The budget for this task is currently estimated at $20,000. We need to raise the money quickly. Unfortunately, we are starting from zero and we have but one week before the scientists would need to be in Hawaii.

Click Here For Copy of Ad – Or See Below:

 An Open Letter to Barack Obama:

Are You A Natural Born Citizen of The United States?

Are You Legally Eligible To Hold The Office Of The President?

www.WeThePeopleFoundation.org

2458 Ridge Road Queensbury, NY 12804

info@GiveMeLiberty.org

 

December 1, 2008

 

Mr. Barack Obama

Barack Obama Transition Office

Kluczynski Federal Building

230 So. Dearborn St.

Chicago, Illinois 60604

 

Dear Mr. Obama:

Representing thousands of responsible American citizens who have also taken an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States of America,

 

I am duty bound to call on you to remedy an apparent violation of the Constitution.

 

Compelling evidence supports the claim that you are barred from holding the Office of President by the “natural born citizen” clause of the U.S. Constitution. For instance:

 

• You have posted on the Internet an unsigned, forged and thoroughly discredited, computer-generated birth form created in 2007, a form that lacks vital information found on any original, hand signed Certificate of Live Birth, such as hospital address, signature of attending physician and age of mother.

 

• Hawaii Dept of Health will not confirm your assertion that you were born in Hawaii.

 

• Legal affidavits state you were born in Kenya

 

• Your grandmother is recorded on tape saying she attended your birth in Kenya.

 

• U.S. Law in effect in 1961 denied U.S. citizenship to any child born in Kenya if the father was Kenyan and the mother was not yet 19 years of age.

 

• In 1965, your mother legally relinquished whatever Kenyan or U.S. citizenship she and you had by marrying an Indonesian and becoming a naturalized Indonesian citizen.

 

You have repeatedly refused to provide evidence of your eligibility when challenged to do so in a number of recent lawsuits. Instead, you have been successful in having judges declare that they are powerless to order you to prove your eligibility to assume the Office of President.

 

Incredibly, the judge in Hawaii actually said it would be an invasion of your privacy for him to order access to your original birth certificate in order to prove your eligibility to hold the Office of President.

 

Before you can legitimately exercise any of the powers of the President you must meet all the criteria for eligibility established by the Constitution. You are under a moral, legal, and fiduciary duty to proffer such evidence.

 

Should you assume the office as anyone but a bona fide natural born citizen of the United States who has not relinquished that citizenship, you would be inviting a national crisis that would undermine the domestic peace and stability of the Nation. For example:

 

• You would always be viewed by many Americans as a poseur – a usurper .

 

• As a usurper , you would be unable to take the required “Oath or Affirmation” on January 20 without committing the crime of perjury or false swearing, for being ineligible you cannot faithfully execute the Office of the President of the United States.

 

• You would be entitled to no allegiance, obedience or support from the People.

 

• The Armed Forces would be under no legal obligation to remain obedient to you.

 

• No civilian in the Executive Branch would be required to obey any of your proclamations, Executive Orders or directives, as such orders would be legally void.

 

• Your appointments of Judges to the Supreme Court would be void.

 

• Congress would not be able to pass any needed legislation because it would not be able to acquire the signature of a bona fide President.

 

• Congress would be unable to remove you, a usurper , from the Office of the President on Impeachment, inviting certain political chaos including a potential for armed conflicts within the General Government or among the States and the People to effect the removal of such a usurper .

In consideration of the escalating constitutional crisis brought on by the total lack of evidence needed to conclusively establish your eligibility, I am compelled to serve you with this First Amendment Petition for a Redress of this violation of the Constitution. With all due respect, I ask that you immediately direct the appropriate Hawaiian officials to allow access to the vault copy of your birth certificate by our forensic scientists on Friday, Saturday and Sunday, December 5, 6 and 7, 2008.

 

In addition, I ask that you deliver the following documentary evidence to the National Press Club in Washington DC by 10 am on December 8, 2008, marked for my attention:

 

• A certified copy of your original, signed “vault” birth certificate.

 

• Certified copies of your reissued and sealed birth certificates in the names Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro, Barry Obama, Barack Dunham and Barry Dunham.

 

• A certified copy of your Certification of Citizenship.

 

• A certified copy of your Oath of Allegiance taken upon age of maturity.

 

• Certified copies of your admission forms for Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard Law School.

 

• Certified copies of any legal documents changing your name.

 

Each member of the Electoral College, who is committed to casting a vote on December 15, 2008, has a constitutional duty to make certain you are a natural-born citizen. As of today, there is no evidence in the public record (nor have you provided any) that defeats the claim that you are

barred by law from assuming the Office of President because you fail the Constitution’s eligibility requirements.

 

All state Electors are now on Notice that unless you provide documentary evidence before December 15, that conclusively establishes your eligibility, they cannot cast a vote for you without committing treason to the Constitution.

 

“In a government of laws, the existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. ”Olmstead v. U.S., 277 U.S. 438”

 

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation in this urgent matter.

 

Sincerely,

 

Robert L. Schulz

Chairman

We The People Foundation

 

 

 

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • More
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...

Golden Choice For Bailout Inflation Protection – Forbes.com

28 Friday Nov 2008

Posted by jschulmansr in Bollinger Bands, capitalism, commodities, Copper, Currency and Currencies, deflation, Finance, gold, hard assets, inflation, Investing, investments, Latest News, Markets, mining stocks, Moving Averages, oil, precious metals, silver, small caps, Stocks, Technical Analysis, Today, U.S. Dollar, Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

agricultural commodities, alternate energy, Austrian school, banking crisis, banks, bear market, Bollinger Bands, bull market, capitalism, central banks, China, Comex, commodities, communism, Copper, Currencies, currency, deflation, depression, diamonds, dollar denominated, dollar denominated investments, economic, economic trends, economy, financial, Forex, futures, futures markets, gold, gold miners, hard assets, heating oil, India, inflation, investments, market crash, Markets, mining companies, Moving Averages, natural gas, oil, palladium, physical gold, platinum, platinum miners, precious metals, price, price manipulation, prices, producers, production, protection, rare earth metals, recession, risk, run on banks, safety, Saudi Arabia, silver, silver miners, socialism, sovereign, spot, spot price, stagflation, Technical Analysis, timber, U.S. Dollar, volatility, warrants, Water

Golden Choice For Bailout Inflation Protection – Forbes.com

John Dobosz, 11.26.08, 11:50 AM EST

Gold and gold miners have taken flight in recent days as the world begins to focus on an inflationary future.

Since the problems associated with the current financial crisis began to take on a particular menace last summer, the response of our monetary institutions has involved moves that most students of economics would call inflationary, like aggressive reduction in targeted short-term lending rates and credit creation at a feverish pace.

Thanks to the deflationary forces that accompanied the unwinding of leverage in the financial system and in the flagging economy at large, the dollar actually rallied and gold suffered big time. From a post Jimmy Carter high of $1,011 in March, spot gold tumbled 30% down to $712 an ounce.

Now, however, investors seem to be awakening to the inflationary impact of the moves by the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department. Over the past three weeks, gold has staged a rally, and over just the past week, it has looked more like a lift-off. Spot gold was above $830 for much of this holiday-shortened trading week, a gain of more than 15% from lows earlier this month, with most of that coming just since Thursday.

Moving higher more rapidly than gold bullion itself are shares of gold miners. The Philadelphia Gold and Silver Mining Index (XAU) added nearly 43% in just the past three days. This could indicate simply that the miners were more deeply oversold, or, if it persists, it could mean that investors are looking for escalating gold prices down the line. Either way, it looks like gold and the miners are staging a decent rally that could last until the first quarter of next year, according to Curt Hesler, editor of Professional Timing Service.

Hesler has several mining stocks that he likes for playing the new buoyancy in gold shares, from blue chips like Goldcorp (nyse: (GG) – news – people ) to smaller names like Yamana Gold (nyse: (AUY) – news – people ) and the tiny like US Gold Corp. (amex: (UXG) – news – people ). For smaller investors, perhaps it’s best to buy a basket of miners and jump on the train.

A great way to get into gold miners is through the Fidelity Select Gold (FSAGX) fund, a diversified grab bag that holds a small amount of gold bullion and a long roster of mining companies. Its biggest holdings are in Barrick Gold (nyse: (ABX) – news – people ), Goldcorp and Newmont Mining (nyse: (NEM) – news – people ) and Agnico Eagle (nyse: (AEM) – news – people ).

The expense ratio of FSAGX is one of the things to like most about this fund. At 0.81% it’s nearly half the 1.47% charged by most precious metals funds. Another nice feature is that it trades throughout the day, and you can get in and out when you like and even use limit orders when buying.

Lately the fund has been volatile, but it’s going in the right direction for the bulls. It’s up 40% in the past month. Of course, prior to that, it lost half of its value from late September through late October, overshooting even the steep correction in gold. Many advisers recommend an allocation of 5% to 10% in your portfolio to inflation hedges, like gold.

Click here to sign up to receive Stock of the Week next Monday morning.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • More
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...

Ten investing rules that will help you weather this stormy market – MarketWatch

28 Friday Nov 2008

Posted by jschulmansr in capitalism, commodities, Currency and Currencies, deflation, Finance, Fundamental Analysis, gold, inflation, Investing, investments, Latest News, Markets, mining stocks, Moving Averages, precious metals, small caps, Stocks, Technical Analysis, Today, U.S. Dollar, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on Ten investing rules that will help you weather this stormy market – MarketWatch

Tags

10 Rules of Investing, agricultural commodities, alternate energy, Austrian school, banking crisis, banks, bear market, Bollinger Bands, bull market, capitalism, central banks, China, Comex, commodities, communism, Copper, Currencies, currency, deflation, depression, diamonds, dollar denominated, dollar denominated investments, economic, economic trends, economy, financial, Forex, futures, futures markets, gold, gold miners, hard assets, heating oil, India, inflation, investments, market crash, Markets, mining companies, Moving Averages, natural gas, oil, palladium, physical gold, platinum, platinum miners, precious metals, price, price manipulation, prices, producers, production, protection, rare earth metals, recession, risk, run on banks, safety, Saudi Arabia, silver, silver miners, socialism, sovereign, spot, spot price, stagflation, Technical Analysis, timber, U.S. Dollar, volatility, warrants, Water

Ten investing rules that will help you weather this stormy market – MarketWatch

By Jonathan Burton, MarketWatch

LIFE SAVINGS

Learn a lesson — before you get one

Ten rules to remember about investing in the stock market

Especially now. Investment rules are tailor-made for tough times, allowing you to stick to a plan just when you need it most. Indeed, a rulebook is important in any market climate, but it tends to get tossed when stocks are soaring. That’s why sage investors warn people not to confuse a bull market with brains.
So with the economy looking more and more like the oil-shocked, stagflation-strapped 1970s, and stocks recoiling from rising unemployment, record energy prices and falling home values, it makes sense to dust off the old playbook and see how it applies today.
One of the most relevant lists of rules, from a legendary Wall Street veteran, is also among the least known. Beginning in the late 1950s, Bob Farrell pioneered technical analysis, which rates a stock not only on a company’s financial strength or business line but also on the strong patterns and line charts reflected in the shares’ trading history. Farrell also broke new ground using investor sentiment figures to better understand how markets and individual stocks might move.
Over several decades at brokerage giant Merrill Lynch & Co., Farrell had a front-row seat to the go-go markets of the late 1960s, mid-1980s and late 1990s, the brutal bear market of 1973-74, and October 1987’s crash. Out of those and other experiences came Farrell’s 10 “Market Rules to Remember.”
These days, Farrell lives in Florida, and efforts to contact him were unsuccessful. Still, the following rules he advocated resonate during volatile markets such as this:
1. Markets tend to return to the mean over time…
By “return to the mean,” Farrell means that when stocks go too far in one direction, they come back. If that sounds elementary, then remember that both euphoric and pessimistic markets can cloud people’s heads.
“It’s so easy to get caught up in the heat of the moment and not have perspective,” says Bob Doll, global chief investment officer for equities at money manager BlackRock Inc. “Those that have a plan and stick to it tend to be more successful.”
2. Excesses in one direction will lead to an opposite excess in the other direction…
Think of the market as a constant dieter who struggles to stay within a desired weight range but can’t always hit the mark.
“In the 1990s when we were advancing by 20% per year, we were heading for disappointment,” says Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at Standard & Poor’s Inc. “Sooner or later, you pay it back.”
3. There are no new eras — excesses are never permanent…
This harkens to the first two rules. Many investors try to find the latest hot sector, and soon a fever builds that “this time it’s different.” Of course, it never really is. When that sector cools, individual shareholders are usually among the last to know and are forced to sell at lower prices.
“It’s so hard to switch and time the changes from one sector to another,” says John Buckingham, editor of The Prudent Speculator newsletter. “Find a strategy that you believe in and stay put.”
4. Exponential rapidly rising or falling markets usually go further than you think, but they do not correct by going sideways…
This is Farrell’s way of saying that a popular sector can stay hot for a long while, but will fall hard when a correction comes. Chinese stocks not long ago were market darlings posting parabolic gains, but investors who came late to this party have been sorry.
5. The public buys the most at the top and the least at the bottom…
Sure, and if they didn’t, contrarian-minded investors would have nothing to crow about. Accordingly, many market technicians use sentiment indicators to gauge investor pessimism or optimism, then recommend that investors head in the opposite direction.
Some closely watched indicators have been mixed lately. At Investors Intelligence, an investment service that measures the mood of more than 100 investment newsletter writers, bullish sentiment rose last week to 44.8% from 37.9% the week before. Bearish sentiment slipped to 31.1% from 32.2%. Meanwhile, the American Association of Individual Investors survey was less positive, with bearish sentiment at 45.8% and bulls at 31.4% .
Learn a lesson — before you get one!
6. Fear and greed are stronger than long-term resolve…
Investors can be their own worst enemy, particularly when emotions take hold.
Stock market gains “make us exuberant; they enhance well-being and promote optimism,” says Meir Statman, a finance professor at Santa Clara University in California who studies investor behavior. “Losses bring sadness, disgust, fear, regret. Fear increases the sense of risk and some react by shunning stocks.”
After grim trading days like Friday’s nearly 400-point tumble, coming after months of downward pressure on stocks, it’s easy to think you’re the patsy at this card table. To counter those insecure feelings, practice self-control and keep long-range portfolio goals in perspective. That will help you to be proactive instead of reactive.
“It’s critical for investors to understand how they’re cut,” says the Prudent Speculator’s Buckingham. “If you can’t handle a 15% or 20% downturn, you need to rethink how you invest.”
7. Markets are strongest when they are broad and weakest when they narrow to a handful of blue-chip names…
Markets and individual sectors can move in powerful waves that take all boats up or down in their wake. There’s strength in numbers, and such broad momentum is hard to stop, Farrell observes. In these conditions you either lead, follow or get out of the way.
When momentum channels into a small number of stocks, it means that many worthy companies are being overlooked and investors essentially are crowding one side of the boat. That’s what happened with the “Nifty 50” stocks of the early 1970s, when much of the U.S. market’s gains came from the 50 biggest companies on the New York Stock Exchange. As their price-to-earnings ratios climbed to unsustainable levels, these “one-decision” stocks eventually sunk.
Chart of SPX
8. Bear markets have three stages — sharp down, reflexive rebound and a drawn-out fundamental downtrend…
Is this a bear market? That depends on where you draw the starting line. With Friday’s close, the S&P 500 Index (SPX):
(SPX) 896.24, +8.56, +1.0%) is down 13.1% since its October 9 peak. Not the 20%-plus decline that typically marks a bear, but a vicious encounter nonetheless.
Where are we now? A chart of the S&P 500 shows a couple of sharp downs and subsequent rebounds in the past six months, with a tighter trading range since April. It remains to be seen if we can avoid a tortured period of the kind seen from 2000 to 2002, when sporadic rallies couldn’t snap a slow, protracted decline.
9. When all the experts and forecasts agree — something else is going to happen…
As Stovall, the S&P investment strategist, puts it: “If everybody’s optimistic, who is left to buy? If everybody’s pessimistic, who’s left to sell?”
Going against the herd as Farrell repeatedly suggests can be very profitable, especially for patient buyers who raise cash from frothy markets and reinvest it when sentiment is darkest.
10. Bull markets are more fun than bear markets (unless you are shorting the markets)…
No kidding!
DARE SOMETHING WORTHY TODAY TOO! Bonus: Top Performing Precious Metals Mutual Funds
TOP PERFORMING PRECIOUS METALS FUNDS
FUND 1-Month
Return
1-Year
Return
3-Year
Return
ProFunds Precious Metals (PMPIX)

42.6%

-68.8

-21.6%

Fidelity Select Gold (FSAGX)

35.4

-42.4

0.5

American Century Global Gold (BGEIX)

34.8

-48.5

-4.2

OCM Gold Fund (OCMGX)

34.1

-45.6

1.4

Evergreen Precious Metals (EKWBX)
32.5

-43.5

2.4

Franklin Gold and Precious Metals (FKRCX)

32.0

-50.6

-2.6

Van Eck Intl Investors Gold (INIVX)

31.9

-49.4

2.3

USAA Precious Metals & Minerals (USAGX)

31.6

-47.4

3.0

GAMCO Gold AAA (GOLDX)

31.6

-48.6

-1.4

DWS Gold & Precious Metals (SCGDX)

31.1

-49.8

-3.5

 

Through 11/24/08. Source: Morningstar.com

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • More
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...

Obama just show us the Birth Certificate! What are you hiding?

25 Tuesday Nov 2008

Posted by jschulmansr in 2008 Election, Barack Obama, capitalism, Currency and Currencies, Electoral College, Finance, Free Speech, gold, id theft, Investing, investments, Joe Biden, John McCain, Latest News, Markets, Politics, Presidential Election, Sarah Palin, socialism, Stocks, Today, u.s. constitution, U.S. Dollar, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on Obama just show us the Birth Certificate! What are you hiding?

Tags

2008 Election, Alan Keyes, Barack Obama, Barak Obama, birth certificate, California, capitalism, citizenship, Connecticut, constitutional, Cover Up, Currency and Currencies, Democratic National Party, Department of Health, DNC, dual citizenship, Election 2008, Electoral College, Executive Branch, Faith2Action, FEC, Federalist Blog, Finance, fraud, Gary Kreep, Georgia, hawaii, id theft, illegal alien, Indonesia, Indonesian Citizenship, Investing, investments, Jerome Corsi, Joe Biden, John McCain, kenya, Latest News, Lawsuit, Lawsuits, Markets, natural born citizen, New Jersey, Ohio, passport, Pennsylvania, Phillip Berg, Politics, President, President Elect, President of the United States, Presidential Election, Presidential Election 2008, Prophecy, Religion, Sarah Palin, socialism, Supreme Court, Today, U.S. Citizen, u.s. constitution, U.S. Dollar, Uncategorized, United States Justice Foundation, United States Passport, usurper, Washington, World Net Daily, YouTube

 
 Nov. 26th 2008

 

Obama just show us the Birth Certificate! What are you hiding?

The Following is a collection of the very latest news on the Obama Birth Certificate Controversy- Must Read For ALL Citizens of the United States!

MY OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL- jschulmansr


Orders from new president to spark lawsuit every time
Lawyer lining up plaintiff groups until citizenship dispute addressed!

By Bob Unruh
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

A lawyer who is playing a key role in a California lawsuit urging officials to prevent the state’s 55 Electoral College votes from being recorded for Barack Obama until questions about his citizenship are resolved says he’s organizing plans to challenge, even after the inauguration, every order, every proposal, every piece of paperwork generated by Obama.

 

“We will file lawsuits on his actions, every time. As long as we have money , we will keep filing lawsuits until we get a decision as to his citizenship status,” Gary Kreep, chief of the United States Justice Foundation, told WND today.

“We’re already talking to groups who are willing to be plaintiffs,” he said.

As WND reported, Kreep filed the California challenge with presidential candidate Alan Keyes as a plaintiff.

The complaint urges the California secretary of state to refuse to allow the state’s 55 Electoral College votes to be cast until Obama’s citizenship and related eligibility to hold office is resolved.

 

 

It is just one of more than a dozen legal challenges brought forward so far over Obama’s citizenship. The cases all cite Obama’s clouded history and the U.S. Constitution’s requirement that a president be a “natural-born” citizen.

Sign the petition to insist on release of birth certificate.

There have been allegations he was born in Kenya, not Hawaii as his campaign has reported, that he could be considered a British subject because of his father’s residency in what then was a British protectorate that later became Kenya, and that the “Certificate of Live Birth” posted on his website simply shows his mother registered his birth in Hawaii after he was born but does not document a location.

There also have been questions raised about his travels as a youth, including the years he spent registered as a Muslim in an Indonesian school, and his later travels to Pakistan at a time when U.S. passports weren’t welcome in that nation.

WND senior reporter Jerome Corsi traveled to Kenya and Hawaii prior to the election to investigate issues surrounding Obama’s birth. But his research and discoveries only raised more questions.

The biggest question is why Obama, if a Hawaii birth certificate exists, simply hasn’t ordered it made available to settle the rumors.

The governor’s office in Hawaii said there is a valid certificate but rejected requests for access and left ambiguous its origin: Does the certificate on file with the Department of Health indicate a Hawaii birth or was it generated after the Obama family registered a Kenyan birth in Hawaii?

Obama’s half-sister, Maya Soetoro, has named two different Hawaii hospitals where Obama could have been born, while a video posted on YouTube features Obama’s Kenyan grandmother Sarah claiming to have witnessed  Obama’s birth in Kenya.

The California action was filed on behalf of Keyes, as well as Wiley S. Drake and Markham Robinson, both California electors.

“Should Senator Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America and, thereby, his election declared void, Petitioners, as well as other Americans, will suffer irreparable harm in that (a) usurper will be sitting as the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal,” the action challenges.

Kreep told WND today he’s now working with several groups that could serve as plaintiffs to challenge Obama’s actions, even from the Oval Office, should the issue remain in dispute.

“There is a reasonable and common expectation by the voters that to qualify for the ballot, the individuals running for office must meet minimum qualifications as outlined in the federal and state Constitutions and statutes, and that compliance with those minimum qualifications has been confirmed by the officials overseeing the election process,” the complaint said, when in fact the only documentation currently required is a signed statement from the candidate attesting to those qualifications.

The issue is much more important than a single candidate, said Judge Roy Moore, the former chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court and a WND columnist. He now runs the Foundation for Moral Law.

Moore had his own constitutional confrontation when he was removed from his position Alabama Supreme Court chief justice after he refused to remove from state grounds a monument recognizing the Ten Commandments as the foundation for U.S. law.

“We can survive four years of any president; we cannot survive without a Constitution,” he told WND. “This calls for a major investigation. Our Constitution is at stake.”

Moore said the requirement for a president to be a natural-born citizen is clear in the Constitution. The document, he added, provides procedures to amend the requirement, but that hasn’t been done.

“We live under the rule of law,” he warned, “If we start ignoring that. …”

A WND reader agreed in a letter to the editor.

“If Obama is allowed to take office without proving his citizenship, then we have no Constitution. America as it’s been will be dead. If an easy to understand rule is ignored, then the others harder to understand will be easy to ignore,” wrote Tony Costello.

Moore said, “If a person is not qualified, he’s not qualified. It doesn’t matter who it is, Republican, Democrat, black or white, rich or poor.”

He added the members of the Electoral College have an obligation to verify Obama’s qualifications before voting for him.

But he said the dispute may end up with court action, too.

“The courts are there to uphold the law. People have a right to change the Constitution. But until then it’s the rule of law,” he said.

“I don’t see any reason a candidate who has such a serious question would not come forward with the truth about where he was born,” Moore said.

“The Supreme Court has to answer this. They have to do it by law and not by the popularity of a person. If we do that, we might as well throw the Constitution out the window,” Moore said.

“[Obama] has the answer. He knows where he was born. If he tells something that’s untrue that’s another matter. It’s not an Obama issue, it’s an American issue. It’s about the Constitution of the United States.”

U.S. State Department officials declined to respond to WND inquiries about the process for keeping a U.S. citizenship while attending schools in Indonesia, or the possibility of a U.S. citizen keeping that status while traveling on another nation’s passport.

But several online “fact” sites have reported that the concerns over Obama’s citizenship are much ado about nothing.

Factcheck.org, for example, has posted an image described as Obama’s “birth certificate.” But within the image can be seen the words “Certificate of Live Birth,” which is not the same document. In Hawaii at the time Obama was born the state would issue a “Certificate of Live Birth” to a parent registering a birth, but it does not indicate the location of the birth.

“FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate,” the group said in a statement accompanying the image of the “Certificate of Live Birth.”

Snopes, also, attested to Obama’s U.S. citizenship, citing information from the campaign itself.

However, WND columnist Janet Porter, who has investigated the dispute, wrote in her column today that there are too many questions to ignore.

“In Hawaii, a Certification of Live Birth is issued within a year of a child’s birth to those who register a birth abroad or one that takes place outside a hospital,” she said.

She cited the work of Ron Polarik, who holds a Ph.D. in instructional media and specializes in computer graphics with over 20 years experience with computers, printers and typewriters.

“Polarik has submitted a signed affidavit and has now released his findings on video at http://www.obamaforgery.com/ with his identity masked and voice altered to guard against the carrying out of threats, which he has already received,” Porter wrote.

“The Summary: The Certificate of Live Birth documents posted on Mr. Obama’s website http://www.fightthesmears.com/, Daily Kos (a pro-Obama blog) and factcheck.org, (a pro-Obama political research group), were found to be altered and forged,” she said.

The researcher cited problems with pixels in the image and a fold line and a blurry border. He asserts the border is a 2007 version while the seal and signature are from 2008.

She also cited issues beyond the birth certificate.

“There’s the matter that Obama traveled to Indonesia, Pakistan, Southern India and Kenya in 1981. He said he went to Indonesia to see his mother. This seemed plausible, except for the fact that his mother returned to Hawaii in August of 1980 to file for a divorce from her second husband, Lolo Soetoro. Unless she went back to pal around with the man she divorced, she wasn’t there at the time of Obama’s visit,” Porter wrote.

“There’s another problem. No record of Obama holding an American passport prior to the one he received once becoming a U.S. senator has been found. If he traveled to Pakistan with an American passport, he wouldn’t have been allowed in – since Pakistan was in turmoil in 1981 and under martial law. It was also on the State Department’s travel ban list for U.S. citizens,” she wrote.

“If he couldn’t get into Pakistan with a U.S. passport, perhaps he went there with an Indonesian passport. But the only way you can get one of those is if you are an Indonesian citizen,” she wrote.

Porter encouraged residents to contact the members of the House Judiciary Committee with a request to hold congressional hearings and write to the U.S. Supreme Court to request a ruling.

On the FederalistBlog the writers concluded:

“A child born to an American mother and alien father could be said to be a citizen of the United States by some affirmative act of law but never entitled to be a natural-born citizen because through laws of nature the child inherits the condition of their father.”

Obama’s mother held U.S. citizenship, but his father never did.

WND also reported that Herb Titus, the Constitution Party’s running mate to Howard Phillips in 1996 and recognized authority on the U.S. Constitution, said it is up the electors from the 50 states to make certain Obama is a natural-born U.S. citizen before they cast votes for him in the Electoral College Dec. 15.

“If they do their duty, they would make sure that if they cast a vote for Mr. Obama, that Mr. Obama is a natural-born citizen,” he told WND.

“I think it should be resolved. The duty is in the Electoral College. Every Obama elector that is committed to casting a vote on the 15th of December, they have a constitutional duty to make certain whether Mr. Obama is a natural-born citizen,” he said.

If the electors fail their duty and Obama proves ultimately to fail the eligibility requirement of the U.S. Constitution, there would be only the laborious, contentious and cumbersome process of impeachment available to those who would wish to follow the Constitution, he suggested.

On WND’s new forum page, the level of frustration was rising. Dozens contributed their thoughts immediately after the forum was posted:

“What makes Obama non-respon[sive] to the simplest of requests?” asked one reader. “Does he think that it is politically incorrect to ask for authentication of the myriad of facts about himself … Is he testing the grounds to see how far he can play with this charade?”

Other comments included:

  • “Obama won his first election ever by getting three Democratic opponents thrown off the ballot? He’s all for using the law to help himself win. Wouldn’t it be ironic if he is not allowed to serve as president due to the law? … Turn around is fair play!
  • “Even the left-wing liberal news media is beginning to ask the question: ‘Who is this man we have elected? We really do not know much about him.'”
  • “Obama’s refusal to produce the ORIGINAL given birth certificate gives us all pause. His silence on these allegations is deafening. The anointed one believes that if he can hold us all back until he’s in the Oval Office he’s hit a home run and he’s ‘safe.’ Ah, not so! Check your law, Obama, and you will see that even if were to make it to the White House you will no longer be able to hide behind those red velvet ropes.”
  • “There must be something that would have caused him great harm prior to the election, and would have stopped him from becoming elected. What could that little piece of information be?”

Rathergate II: Certification of Live Birth a clear forgery

From FAITH TO ACTION – JANET PORTER

The media bought it. The voters bought it. And now some in Congress are resisting the idea of congressional hearings because they believe that Barack Obama’s “birth certificate” has been posted online.
Not so.

What was posted was not a birth certificate, but something that resembles a “Certification of Live Birth” or COLB, which, even if authentic, does not prove “natural born” U.S. citizenship. You see, in Hawaii, a Certification of Live Birth is issued within a year of a child’s birth to those who register a birth abroad or one that takes place outside a hospital.

It’s Rathergate all over again with more amiss than a 1970s Selectric typewriter. But before I tell you what the experts found, let me ask you a few questions:

  1. If you were a natural born American citizen and had it within your means to quiet all the lawsuits and questions with proof, would you do it?
  2. If you were a natural born American citizen, would you spend thousands of dollars to fight the legal cases against you, or would you simply answer the legitimate question of whether you meet the constitutional requirements for office?
  3. If you were a natural born American citizen, would you forge a document called a “Certification of Live Birth” and tell the public it was a real “birth certificate”?

If someone were to violate the law by manufacturing a forgery in order trick the public, would that be enough evidence for members of Congress to conduct hearings and for a court to issue an order for the critical records, including the original long-form birth certificate (signed by the doctor) to ensure that the U.S. constitutional requirements for office were not violated? After all, Congress is sworn to uphold and defend that Constitution, and the justices on the U.S. Supreme Court are “guardians” of the Constitution. That’s their job, isn’t it?

Ron Polarik, who holds a Ph.D. in Instructional Media and specializes in computer graphics with over 20 years experience with computers, printers and typewriters, has come forth with more definitive evidence than the word processor that tried to simulate a 1970s Selectric typewriter.

Polarik has submitted a signed affidavit and has now released his findings on video at http://www.obamaforgery.com/ with his identity masked and voice altered to guard against the carrying out of threats, which he has already received.

Just Received Into my Emailbox- YOU MUST READ THIS TOO!

From: GOPUSA [mailto:eagle@gopusamedia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 12:59 PM
To: jschulmansr
Subject: Team Obama Calls Birth Cert. Request Garbage
— The following e-mail comes from one of our sponsoring advertisers. Through their support, GOPUSA can continue to bring you the best array of conservative news, information, commentary, and discussions.
  Source: UNITED STATES JUSTICE FOUNDATION

 

 Team Obama:”All I can tell you is that it is just pure garbage.”

 

  According to the WorldNetDaily headline above, that was the retort of an Obama campaign spokesperson when asked about complaints requesting that Senator Obama produce a valid Birth Certificate to prove that he is constitutionally eligible to be President of the United States.

   Article 2, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States, states, “No person except a natural born citizen of the United States, at the time of adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President.”

   The Constitution of the United States is NOT “garbage” and furthermore, securing the rights of the people under the Constitution is NOT “garbage”!

   The Obama campaign’s response is an elitist, condescending slap in the face to patriotic Americans. No one is above the law and Team Obama cannot make the question of Obama’s eligibility go away by disrespecting the American people – and, by inference, the Constitution of the United States.

   That’s why we just filed an action that Senator Obama will not be able to ignore… an action that WILL NOT GO AWAY!

   In fact, in my humble opinion… we will ONLY “LOSE” if we do NOT have the resources we need to carry on for as long as it takes, and we will “win” as long as we can carry on this fight (more on that later).

 The Obama campaign has a crack team of high-priced law firms – that’s not three lawyers but THREE LAW FIRMS – that will use every means that money! can buy to fight this action. We’re relying on you and patriotic Americans like you.

Why The “Berg Case” Is Dead In The Water And Why USJF Will Succeed…

   You probably already know that Pennsylvania attorney Philip J. Berg filed a suit in U.S. District Court several months back contending that Senator Obama is not a “natural-born” citizen.

   And you probably already know that the court dismissed the suit claiming that Berg, as a private citizen, “lacked standing to bring the case.”

   Of course, Berg is not the only one who has filed an action and the “Berg Case” is not the only one in which the courts have relied upon the lack-of-standing technicality.

   Georgia Superior Court Judge Jerry W. Baxter denied an action saying to the plaintiff Rev. Tom Terry, “I don’t think you have standing to bring this suit.”

   Washington State Superior Court Judge John Erlick dismissed yet another suit ruling that even the Secretary of State did not have authority to inquire about Senator Obama’s birth certificate.

   Can you believe it?  What’s going on? Well, perhaps Berg said it best;
“This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don’t have standing, if you don’t have standing, if your neighbor doesn’t have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be president of the United States — the commander in chief, the most powerful person in the world — then who does?”

  Of course, Berg’s statement also illustrates why the “Berg Case” and some of these other actions are doomed to fail and why we believe our action WILL succeed!

   Simply stated, the lack-of-standing argument is already out there. Yes, it’s egregious but the all too sad reality is that judges will continue to grab onto it like a life-preserver now that it has been put into play… the die has ! been cast!

   That’s why USJF is taking a different approach. Our petitioners are Dr. Alan Keyes, Dr. Wiley S. Drake, Sr. and Markham Robinson!

   We state in the Petition we just filed with the court:
“The parties in this case have standing to bring this litigation, due to the fact that Dr. Keyes and Dr. Drake, Sr., are candidates on the California ballot for President and Vice President of the United States, and Mr. Robinson is an Elector for the Keyes-Drake ticket, and Vice Chairman of America’s Independent Party, of Fenton, Michigan, which nominated Dr. Keyes for President. He is also a Chairman of the American Independent Party (California), which nominated Dr. Keyes and Dr. Drake for President and Vice President, respectively. Based on the foregoing, it is imperative for SOS to be provided proof that Senator Obama is a ‘natural born’ citizen.”

  Alan Keyes and Wiley Drake were actually on the ballot in California and Markham Robinson is an Elector for Keyes-Drake. If they don’t have standing, one would be hard-pressed to find ANY! ONE who has standing and if the court attempts to use the lack-of-standing argument, it’s an implied admission that NO ONE has standing to enforce the Constitution!

The Usurper-in-Chief…

   Now… a dose of reality. Frankly, a case of this magnitude could be in the courts for years. There are no quick solutions… BUT THAT’S OKAY.

   The key is in the following statement which also appears in the Petition:

“Should Senator Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of! the United States of America and, thereby, his election declared void , Petitioners, as well as other Americans, will suffer irreparable harm in that an usurper will be sitting as the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal.”

   Part of that statement bears repeating:

“… none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal.”

   In other words, as long as this case is in the courts, a cloud hangs over Senator Obama’s head and for the sake of our Constitution and our Republic, the issue MUST be resolved!

   If President Obama issues an Executive Order to rescind the Mexico City Policy and allows the tax dollars of Americans to fund orga! nizations that promote abortions overseas, the door to question the legitimacy of that Executive Order remains open.

   If President Obama signs a treaty with an unfriendly power or an agreement with the United Nations, the door to question the legitimacy of that treaty remains open.

   If President Obama signs a bill granting amnesty to illegal aliens into law, the door to question the legitimacy of that law remains open.

   If President Obama appoints new Commissioners to the Federal Communications! Commission (FCC) who bring back the so-called Fairness Do ctrine, the door to question those appointments and the legitimacy of the actions taken by his appointees remains open.

    That’s not to say that he can’t or won’t be able to fulfill the duties of his office, but until this matter is resolved… until he can validate that he is constitutionally eligible to be President of the United States, the door will always remain open to question and challenge the legitimacy of his actions and the dire consequences of those actions.

   In short… as long as we have the resources to fight, we’re ahead of the game!

   That’s where you come in.
The United States Justice Foundation (USJF) is a nonprofit public interest, legal action organization and has been your conservative voice in the courts since 1979. And since USJF is a 501(c)3 nonprofit, your generous assistance is also TAX DEDUCTIBLE!

You can use this link or the hyperlink below to help – it’s TAX DEDUCTIBLE. Is it worth a TAX DEDUCTIBLE effort of $5000 or $2500 or even $100 or $50 or $25 to defend the Constitution and the integrity of our electoral process?

The Obama campaign has a crack team of high-priced law firms – that’s not three lawyers but THREE LAW FIRMS – that will use every means that money! can buy to fight this action. We’re relying on you and patriotic Americans like you.

https://secure.conservativedonations.com/usjf_house/?a=1922

Please use the hyperlink above to make your best TAX-DEDUCTIBLE effort to be a part of this battle.

I’m Not Living In The Real World…

   To be brutally blunt, a case of this magnitude may not be won or lost on the merits.

   I’m very proud of USJF’s accomplishments over the past 29 years.

   We’ve defended Minuteman Civil Defens! e Corps members protecting our borders from illegal aliens.

  We handled litigation against Hillary Clinton for campaign finance fraud in her 2000 Senate race.

   We’ve submitted testimony before the United States Senate on Supreme Court appointees.

   But all that won’t really matter. It won’t matter which side has the most skilled attorneys. Talent, competence and experience do not assure victory.

   Here’s the bottom line.

   Team Obama presently has THREE LAW FIRMS at its disposal – and a seemingly unlimited ability to raise funds from the far-left for more legal help.

  This potentially translat! es to hundreds of attorneys and law clerks who can literally throw paperwork at us until we crack under the sheer pressure and cry uncle.

   Team Obama WILL try to wear us down (which by the way is yet another reason why the “Berg Case” and many of the others – as mentioned earlier – are doomed to fail and why we CAN get the job done).

   They’ll stall and delay and throw paperwork at us so fast, so furiously and for so long… then they’ll wait for us to break under the strain and give up. Or so they think…

   Team Obama doesn’t fear our skill or the merits of our case.

   The ONLY THING THEY FEAR IS YOU!

   They hope and pray that you will not support our efforts or that! you will grow tired of the fight. What they fear most is that you will join us and support our efforts!

   They know that if you support us, we’ll have the ability to take on additional clerical and research staff, cover court fees, file briefs and take on outside counsel on an as-needed basis.

   That’s why they’re praying you don’t help us… but we’re praying that you do!

   USJF wasn’t approached by a group of hot-shot movers and shakers. We took on this burden because like you we love this great country and we REFUSE to stand idly by while the Left disrespects the Constitution, the American people and our electoral process.

  USJF is a nonprofit public interest, legal action organization. We go where others fear to tread. We’re adept at taking on vastly superior forces. And we’re committed to hitting the trenches on this one and will! ing to get bloody if we must.

   That’s our promise to you.

   But, in the end, our commitment and our “pit-bull” determination doesn’t amount to a hill of beans.

   Winning or losing is NOT in our control… and it’s not in Team Obama’s control… IT’S IN YOUR HANDS!

   A lot of folks are very angry over Barack Obama’s refusal to validate his eligibility to be President of the United States.

   Is it worth a TAX DEDUCTIBLE effort of $5000 or $2500 or even $100 or $50 or $25 to defend the Constitution, the rights of Patriotic Americans under the Constitution and the integrity of our electoral process?

   Is it worth forwarding this e-mail to ! your family and friends with a personal note asking them to join the f ight?

   The choice is now up to you.

   Please help us and after helping us, please forward this e-mail to everyone in your address book.

   We’re in… how about you?
The United States Justice Foundation (USJF) is a nonprofit public interest, legal action organization and has been your conservative voice in the courts since 1979. And since USJF is a 501(c)3 nonprofit, your generous assistance is also TAX DEDUCTIBLE!

You can use this link or the hyperlink below to help – it’s TAX DEDUCTIBLE. Is it worth a TAX DEDUCTIBLE effort of $5000 or $2500 or even $100 or $50 or $25 to defend the Constitution and the integrity of our electoral process?

The Obama campaign has a crack team of high-priced law firms – that’s not three lawyers but THREE LAW FIRMS – that will use every means that money! can buy to fight this action. We’re relying on you and patriotic Americans like you.

https://secure.conservativedonations.com/usjf_house/?a=1922

Please use the hyperlink above to make your best TAX-DEDUCTIBLE effort to be a part of this battle.

In His Service

Gary Kreep, Executive Director
United States Justice Foundation

My Note – I made a donation and hope you will join me!!!

jschulmansr

The Summary: The Certificate of Live Birth documents posted on Mr. Obama’s website http://www.fightthesmears.com/, Daily Kos (a pro-Obama blog) and factcheck.org, (a pro-Obama political research group), were found to be altered and forged.

  1. The problem of the pixels: When you have a green patterned document such as this, there should be a lot of green pixels from the background showing up between the letters that appear on the certification. But in this case, instead of green pixels, there are white and grey pixels between the letters, which result when you replace existing text with other text.
  2. There is no second fold line. The pictures show two folds – necessary to fit any COLB into an envelope for mailing, but the document itself shows only one fold. This is another indication of document alteration.
  3. There’s a blurred border. The border has a lower resolution than the rest of the document, which is another indication that it has been altered.
  4. The border is one that is used in 2007 COLBs. As a security measure, Hawaii changes their borders every year. This is when the Obama campaign claims the certificate was obtained. That is fine except for the problem that …
  5. The seal and signature stamp are from a 2008 COLB. As revealed by a process called edging, the Hawaiian seal and signature stamp on the back of the document are revealed to be from the wrong year!

Like with Rathergate, when you’re creating documents, make sure you use only a typewriter that was invented at the time you report the document was manufactured. When posting a “Certification of Live Birth,” make sure you “borrow” only from documents used in the same year!

Be sure to sign the petition demanding evidence of Barack Obama’s constitutional qualifications.

But beyond the birth certificate issue, there’s the matter that Obama traveled to Indonesia, Pakistan, Southern India and Kenya in 1981. He said he went to Indonesia to see his mother. This seemed plausible, except for the fact that his mother returned to Hawaii in August of 1980 to file for a divorce from her second husband, Lolo Soetoro. Unless she went back to pal around with the man she divorced, she wasn’t there at the time of Obama’s visit.

There’s another problem. No record of Obama holding an American passport prior to the one he received once becoming a U.S. senator has been found. If he traveled to Pakistan with an American passport, he wouldn’t have been allowed in – since Pakistan was in turmoil in 1981 and under martial law. It was also on the State Department’s travel ban list for U.S. citizens.

If he couldn’t get into Pakistan with a U.S. passport, perhaps he went there with an Indonesian passport. But the only way you can get one of those is if you are an Indonesian citizen.

That’s quite possible since under Indonesian law, when a male acknowledges a child as his son, it deems the son – in this case Obama – to be an Indonesian state citizen, which was also recorded by Obama’s school record.

So, if he didn’t go to Indonesia in 1981 to visit mom (who had returned to Hawaii by then), might it have something to do with the fact that Indonesian passports expire every five years and it was time for renewal?

Why does that matter?

If Obama would have been a U.S. citizen, 8 USC §1481(a)(2) provides loss of nationality by native born citizens upon “taking an oath or making an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state … after having attained the age of eighteen years,” in violation of 8 U.S.C. §1401(a)(1). Simply put, since Indonesia did not allow for dual citizenship, if Obama got that passport in 1981, when he was 20 years old, he effectively renounced any U.S. citizenship he may have had.

So, if the experts are right, Obama forged a Certification of Live Birth to fool America. In addition to the automatic Indonesian citizenship granted to a child acknowledged as a “son” by an Indonesian male citizen, and the Indonesian citizenship listed in Obama’s school records, Obama then traveled to a place where Americans weren’t allowed to go, but citizens of Indonesia were. If he obtained an Indonesian passport on his trip in 1981, he effectively renounced any American citizenship he may have had and cannot serve as president (or “rule” as president, as members of his campaign have stated). These are serious questions that must have answers.

If Obama gets into office without verification that he has met the requirements of the U.S. Constitution, if you care about life, liberty or the family, you’re going to have to make hundreds of calls to try and fight an agenda that seeks to silence you.

There is a way to help prevent this. Our founders sacrificed their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor. I’m asking you to do three things.

  1. Fast and pray for all the hidden things to come to light.
  2. Call the Republican members of the House Judiciary Committee – in their district offices while they’re home this week for Thanksgiving. Ask them to “Please hold congressional hearings to investigate whether Barack Obama meets the basic constitutional requirements for the highest office of the land.”
  3. Write a letter to the nine Justices of the United States Supreme Court (names are listed below) and put them in a FedEx (or other overnight) envelope to:U.S. Supreme Court
    1 First Street, N.E
    Washington, D.C. 20543

Our Constitution matters and defending it is going to take an outcry from the public. The electors vote on Dec. 15. The numbers are below and your immediate action is critically needed right now. Do it before defending our liberties costs a lot more than making some phone calls and writing a few letters.

The Republican House Judiciary members: Call them at 202-225-3121, AND most importantly reach them in their district offices:

Lamar Smith (Texas), ranking member, critical in any hearings: 512-306-0439 Austin, 830-896-0154 Kerrville, and 210-821-5024 San Antonio.

James Sensenbrenner (Wisconsin) 800-242-1119 or 262-784-1111 Brookfield

Howard Coble (North Carolina) 336-333-5005 Greensboro, 336-626-3060 Asheboro, 336-886-5106 High Point, 226-229-0159 Graham, 704-209-0426 Granite Quarry

Elton Gallegly (California) 800-423-0023 or 805-497-2224 Thousand Oaks, 805-686-2525 Solvang

Bob Goodlatte (Virginia) 540-432-2391 Harrisonburg, 434-845-8306 Lynchburg, 540-857-2672 Roanoke, and 540-885-3861 Staunton

Steve Chabot (Ohio) 513-684-2723 Cincinnati

Dan Lungren (California) 916-859-9906 Gold River

Chris Cannon (Utah) 800-571-2971 Provo, 801-569-5125 West Jordan

Ric Keller (Florida) 407-872-1962 Orlando, 888-642-1211 Eustis, 888-642-1211 Ocala

Darrell Issa (California) 951-693-2447 Temecula, 760-599-5000 San Diego

Mike Pence (Indiana) 765-640-2919 Anderson, 765-962-2883 Richmond, 765-747-5566 Muncie

Randy Forbes (Virginia) 757-382-0080 Chesapeake, 804-526-4969 Colonial Heights, 434-634-5575 Emporia

Steve King (Iowa) 641-782-2495 Creston, 712-580-7754 Spencer, 712-325-1404 Council Bluffs, 712-224-4692 Sioux City, 712-732-4197 Storm Lake

Tom Feeney (Florida) 386-756-9798 Port Orange, 407-208-1106 Orlando, 321-264-6113 Titusville

Trent Franks (Arizona) 623-776-7911 Glendale

Louie Gohmert (Texas) 866-535-6302 Lufkin/Marshall/Nagadoches, 903-236-8597 Longview, 903-561-6349 Tyler

Jim Jordan (Ohio) 419-522-5757 Mansfield, 419-999-6455 Lima, 419-423-3210 Findlay

Supreme Court Justices

Chief Justice John Roberts

Associate Justices:

Samuel A. Alito
Clarence Thomas
Antonin Scalia
Anthony M. Kennedy
David H. Souter
John Paul Stevens
Stephen G. Breyer
Ruth Bader Ginsberg

How important is the Constitution to you? Forward this to all you know.

Be sure to sign the petition demanding evidence of Barack Obama’s constitutional qualifications.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • More
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...

Smart Money Is Starting to Pour into Gold Stocks- Seeking Alpha

24 Monday Nov 2008

Posted by jschulmansr in commodities, Copper, Currency and Currencies, deflation, Finance, gold, hard assets, inflation, Investing, investments, Latest News, Markets, mining stocks, precious metals, silver, U.S. Dollar, Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

agricultural commodities, alternate energy, Austrian school, banking crisis, banks, bear market, Bollinger Bands, bull market, capitalism, central banks, China, Comex, commodities, communism, Copper, Currencies, currency, deflation, depression, diamonds, dollar denominated, dollar denominated investments, economic, economic trends, economy, financial, Forex, futures, futures markets, gold, gold miners, hard assets, heating oil, India, inflation, investments, market crash, Markets, mining companies, Moving Averages, natural gas, oil, palladium, physical gold, platinum, platinum miners, precious metals, price, price manipulation, prices, producers, production, protection, rare earth metals, recession, risk, run on banks, safety, Saudi Arabia, silver, silver miners, socialism, sovereign, spot, spot price, stagflation, Technical Analysis, timber, U.S. Dollar, volatility, warrants, Water

Smart Money Is Starting to Pour into Gold Stocks- Seeking Alpha 

By: Boris Sobolev of Resource Stock Guide.com

In our last update, we expected short term weakness in gold followed by an upward reversal.

In the short term, in order to avoid seeing gold close below $700, it must move above resistances of $780-810 relatively quickly and stabilize close to that range.

And we got exactly what was needed, although the metal is yet to stabilize near the $800s. Gold briefly touched $699, making a higher low, and continued to consolidate between $720 and $750. On Friday, gold spiked 57 points or almost 8% to its first resistance of $800.

While there is some resistance near $825-$850 for the short term, the weekly chart for gold is starting to look promising. But before the downtrend line (now between $900 and $920) is penetrated, we cannot say that the correction in gold is over and that the new stage of the gold bull market has begun.

Fundamentals remain exceptionally bullish on all fronts. Real interest rates are negative while inflation expectations have little room to go lower. A huge wave of fiscal stimulus is on the way.

The independent research house GFMS Ltd. had the following to say about gold demand:

Dollar demand for gold reached an all-time quarterly record of US$32bn in the third quarter of 2008. Tonnage demand was also 18 percent higher than a year earlier.

Identifiable investment demand, which incorporates demand for gold through exchange traded funds (ETFs), bars and coins, was the biggest contributor to overall demand during the quarter; it was up to US$10.7bn (382 tonnes), double the amount from a year earlier.

Retail investment demand rose 121 percent to 232 tonnes in Q3, with strong bar and coin buying reported in Swiss, German and US markets. The quarter also witnessed widespread reports of gold shortages among bullion dealers across the globe, as investors searched for a safe haven. During the quarter, Europe reached an all-time record 51 tonnes of bar and coin buying and France became a net investor in gold for the first time since the early 1980s.

Consumer demand for gold jewellery was also at a record with buyers coming back in to the market at lower price levels than previously, around and below $800. India (traditionally the world’s largest gold jewellery consumer, with an average over the past five years of 21% of world jewellery demand), staged a strong recovery during the quarter, with the dollar value of gold in jewellery rising by 65% year-on-year.

These changes in “identifiable demand” were offset by outflows in “inferred investment”. With recessionary fears looming, hedge funds liquidated investment positions in gold as they were forced to raise cash, and institutions liquidated commodity index investments, including gold. The trend largely reflects gold’s better performance relative to other assets and also explains why the gold price did not perform better during the quarter in the face of very strong demand.

Gold sales by central banks are at their lowest levels since 1999.

Total global gold production contracted 0.4% in 2007, to an eleven-year low. In the last four months, several companies have announced that they are curtailing production or delaying projects, and all companies are at least reviewing their spending plans. Randgold Resources (GOLD) expects global gold production to decline by between 15% and 20% in the next three or four years, as unprofitable operations are squeezed out and difficult market conditions delay the development of new mines.

While this is a difficult process, the whole PM industry will come out of this slump stronger and more resilient. Companies that survive will do exceptionally well.

Unlike most stock indices which made lower lows last week, all gold indices made higher lows. This positive divergence gives us reason to believe that smart money is starting to pour funds into gold stocks – pointing to the evidence of the first sector rotation in this bear market.

Friday saw one of the biggest up-days on HUI, which climbed 46 points or 27.5%. Gold was by far the best performing sector in the entire stock market. We believe that these are all signs that the sector rotation to precious metals and related stocks is underway.

If gold continues to hold up strongly and the stock market rebounds or at least stabilizes, the $HUI index could quickly recover to 275-325 levels.

However, gold stocks continue to underperform the metal. In order for the bullish scenario outlined above to come to fruition, we need to see the downtrend line in the $HUI & Gold ratio be taken out to the upside.

We believe that this should happen in the coming days or weeks. This point of view is based on the fact that the Gold/Oil ratio and the Gold/Industrial Metals ratio have soared to the best levels for gold producers in the past 10 years. This allows us to expect substantial reduction in costs of production and capital expenditures for most mining companies.

Paired with the strong gold price, margins for gold producers should start to improve. We do not know of any other sector in the equity market which is expected to see increases in profit margins.

While the above is directly beneficial for the producers, for juniors, the latest round of acquisition activity gives us reason to believe that the juniors are finally bottoming out.

From a negative point of view, continuing tax selling pressure before the year end could temporarily weaken these positives.

Those investors who are considering putting money in the gold sector should consider the following low-risk, cash generating producers: See RSG Newsletter.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • More
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...

Demanding Gold – Hard Assets Investor

24 Monday Nov 2008

Posted by jschulmansr in capitalism, commodities, Copper, Currency and Currencies, deflation, Finance, Fundamental Analysis, gold, hard assets, inflation, Investing, investments, Latest News, Markets, mining stocks, precious metals, silver, Technical Analysis, Today, U.S. Dollar, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on Demanding Gold – Hard Assets Investor

Tags

agricultural commodities, alternate energy, Austrian school, banking crisis, banks, bear market, Bollinger Bands, bull market, capitalism, central banks, China, Comex, commodities, communism, Copper, Currencies, currency, deflation, depression, diamonds, dollar denominated, dollar denominated investments, economic, economic trends, economy, financial, Forex, futures, futures markets, gold, gold miners, hard assets, heating oil, India, inflation, investments, market crash, Markets, mining companies, Moving Averages, natural gas, oil, palladium, physical gold, platinum, platinum miners, precious metals, price, price manipulation, prices, producers, production, protection, rare earth metals, recession, risk, run on banks, safety, Saudi Arabia, silver, silver miners, socialism, sovereign, spot, spot price, stagflation, Technical Analysis, timber, U.S. Dollar, volatility, warrants, Water

Demanding Gold – Hard Assets Investor

Written by Julian Murdoch of Hard Assets Investor 

Friday night’s headlines were straightforward: “Gold surges to top $800 on safe-haven buying.” And most of the analysis followed a familiar pattern:

  • The price of gold has declined as a result of liquidity selling
  • Once everyone sells the gold, the market will stabilize
  • The price will rally as investors seek a safe haven in the face of monster money-printing by the U.S. government

It’s a convenient story, and one that makes some prima-facie sense. But like any Monday morning quarterbacking (including my own), there’s rarely a way to actually know exactly why something goes up and down. Except, of course, for supply and demand. It’s always about supply and demand.

Which is why I was planning on writing about gold this week even before we saw the metal pop almost 6% Friday, to close at $801.60 (NY Spot), and before we saw the big gold miners like Barrick have monster days, with that company closing up 31%. Pops like that are enough to make anyone sit up and take notice, despite our general concerns about buying miners vs. metals.

Hence my plan to cover gold. The third week in November, you see, is when the World Gold Council releases the supply-and-demand numbers that carry us through the end of the year. And the astonishing thing isn’t so much the numbers, but that they seem to have gone largely unnoticed by the press in describing the rally. Let’s take a look at the charts.

 

 

There are a few points to note here. First, this measures demand in tonnes, not in dollars. We’ll get to dollars in a second.

But the big thing to note here is that the 2008 number is an estimate that we’ve created by applying last year’s Q3-to-Q4 trends to 2008. From Q3 to Q4 2007, gold demand dropped an unexpected 15% on a tonnage basis. The chart above suggests that, even if gold demand falls again, total tonnage demand for 2008 will equal 2007. If Q4’08 demand instead remains steady heading into the end of the year, total 2008 demand will be the biggest in the last five years.

Regardless, however, the strong continued demand, particularly from the investment community, is even more dramatic in dollar terms.

 

Gold Demand ($, Billions

 

In dollar terms, gold is experiencing tremendous demand growth. There’s no rocket science here: The average price of gold in 2007 was just under $700. The average price of gold in 3Q 2008 was $871, down from the first-quarter average of $924. All that means is that that same physical demand is coming at a time of rising prices (or a weak dollar, depending on your perspective).

Gold - London PM Fix 2000 - present

 

To put the demand in perspective, here’s the juicy tidbit direct from the World Gold Council press release:

 

“Dollar demand for gold reached an all-time quarterly record of US$32bn in the third quarter of 2008 as investors around the world sought refuge from the global financial meltdown, and jewelry buyers returned to the market in droves on a lower gold price. This figure was 45% higher than the previous record in Q2 2008. Tonnage demand was also 18% higher than a year earlier.”

 

This dollar demand is driven almost entirely by increased demand from exchange-traded funds and physical coin investments, offsetting a decline in jewelry demand.

 

Gold Demand (Share)

 

To be fair, this continued demand wasn’t entirely unexpected, nor was it completely unreported. Most of the weekend paper hyperbole about the gold rally did pay homage to demand, albeit without citing the nice hard figures we have from the World Gold Council. But what seems really underreported is that the actual supply demand deficit is frankly staggering.

 

Gold Surplus/Deficit

The reasons for this deficit are fairly straightforward: The quarterly demand is high, and one of the major sources of supply over the last few years has dried up – sales by central banks. The Central Bank Gold Agreement, which set limits on gold sales in 1999 to stabilize the market after the foundation of the euro, is set to run its course in 2009, but the 2008 limits on CBGA sales (500 tonnes per year) aren’t even close to being reached, and the reality is that European central banks may simply be done offloading their excess gold reserves.

If true, that means a major source of supply is simply going away. It’s easy to visualize a pathway from the central banks into the hands of investors-a shift in ownership. But that shift in ownership may be complete, and thus, if investor demand continues, it will rely on other traditional sources of gold-namely mines-to get at the stuff.

That would set the stage for continued deficits, higher prices and busy miners. It strikes me that that’s the real story of last week’s rallies.

MY NOTE: Inother simpler words, demand up and increasing = prices increasing!

Disclosure: Long Precious Metals and Stocks

jschulmansr

Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • More
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...

Peter Schiff on Fast Money Calls $2,000 Gold in 2009–Gold Stock Bull

24 Monday Nov 2008

Posted by jschulmansr in capitalism, commodities, Copper, Currency and Currencies, deflation, Finance, Fundamental Analysis, gold, hard assets, inflation, Investing, investments, Latest News, Markets, mining stocks, precious metals, silver, Technical Analysis, Today, U.S. Dollar, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on Peter Schiff on Fast Money Calls $2,000 Gold in 2009–Gold Stock Bull

Tags

agricultural commodities, alternate energy, Austrian school, banking crisis, banks, bear market, Bollinger Bands, bull market, capitalism, central banks, China, Comex, commodities, communism, Copper, Currencies, currency, deflation, depression, diamonds, dollar denominated, dollar denominated investments, economic, economic trends, economy, financial, Forex, futures, futures markets, gold, gold miners, hard assets, heating oil, India, inflation, investments, market crash, Markets, mining companies, Moving Averages, natural gas, oil, palladium, physical gold, platinum, platinum miners, precious metals, price, price manipulation, prices, producers, production, protection, rare earth metals, recession, risk, run on banks, safety, Saudi Arabia, silver, silver miners, socialism, sovereign, spot, spot price, stagflation, Technical Analysis, timber, U.S. Dollar, volatility, warrants, Water

Peter Schiff on Fast Money Calls $2,000 Gold in 2009–Gold Stock Bull

By Jason Hamlin of Gold Stock Bull
 
Mr. Schiff was mocked for calling the market collapse before it happened, correctly predicted that gold would reach $1,000 in 2008 and recently schooled the CNBC crew at Fast Money as he predicts the market has much further to drop and gold will hit $2,000 in 2009. If you’ve been a subscriber to Gold Stock Bull for a while, you know we have been making similar calls and are aligned with his views. 2008 may prove to be the last time you will be able to get gold under $1,000 or silver under $10. The liquidation and deleveraging has created a short-term buying opportunity across all commodities and for precious metals in particular. Get some while you still can because when the floor falls out from beneath the dollar, the party is over.



Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • More
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...

Must Read! Barak Obama Birth Certificate Case – Not Over Yet!

20 Thursday Nov 2008

Posted by jschulmansr in 2008 Election, Barack Obama, capitalism, Currency and Currencies, Finance, id theft, Investing, investments, Joe Biden, John McCain, Latest News, Markets, Politics, Presidential Election, Prophecy, Religion, Sarah Palin, socialism, Today, U.S. Dollar, Uncategorized

≈ 7 Comments

Tags

2008 Election, Barak Obama, birth certificate, California, citizenship, Connecticut, constitutional, Cover Up, Democratic National Party, Department of Health, DNC, dual citizenship, Election 2008, Executive Branch, FEC, fraud, Georgia, hawaii, illegal alien, Indonesia, Indonesian Citizenship, Joe Biden, John McCain, kenya, Lawsuit, Lawsuits, natural born citizen, New Jersey, Ohio, passport, Pennsylvania, Phillip Berg, President, President Elect, President of the United States, Presidential Election 2008, Supreme Court, U.S. Citizen, u.s. constitution, United States Passport, usurper, Washington

Must Read! Barak Obama Birth Certificate Case – Not Over Yet!

THIS IS A SERIES OF ARTICLES TOGETHER – READ TO THE END OF POST/S

My Note: I have been to FactCheck.org (which has direct ties to Obama and the DNC) and read their article re Obama’s Birth Certificate. My questions are still these; if it is true then why doesn’t Obama just produce the Birth Certificate and be done with it? My second question is this why are the “Supreme Court Justices” scheduling a look at the case and if you read all 3 articles below and if the birth certificate exists, and is a valid and legitimate legal document; why are there so many lawsuits pending even from Democrats? Show us the “proof” Obama – Show Us the Birth Certificate…

Must Read Barak Obama Birth Certificate Case – Not Over Yet!

Source: Lit4Ever Prophetic Forum

Something to read and then decide what to do!! 

This is a plea for an increase in prayer for the elections. “What?” you ask. “The elections are over!!!” NO, THEY’RE NOT. The absentee ballots and the military votes have not been counted yet. Neither have the fraudulent votes been dealt with (though there’s doubt that they will). The final decision will be made by the Electoral College which has yet to vote. And, perhaps, most importantly, the lawsuits against BO have not been settled. Some of you may be asking, “What lawsuits?” Actually, there are quite a number of lawsuits in several states that have to do with the question about his eligibility to become President of the United States based on citizenship. For the sake of informed intercession, I’m listing the issues below. While I’ve made every effort to ensure that what I write is accurate and easy-to-read/understand, I make no claim to being an “expert” on the matter. I’m simply going to give enough to make you realize that this is very serious. My purpose is to stir up prayer – not problems so please don’t blast me if you don’t like what I write.

  1.  The US Constitution requires that the President of the United States be a natural born citizen. Therefore, before running for this office, all 43 previous presidents have had no problem with producing their birth certificates to prove eligibility. For some reason, Obama does not wish to comply with this simple requirement. This has resulted in many unanswered questions and much confusion.
 

2.  Obama claimed to have placed his “original” birth certificate on the Internet. However, after author/editor/internet columnist Andy Martin filed a lawsuit, the Hawaii government confirmed that officials had examined the original, typewritten 1961 document, and confirmed that the document released by the Obama campaign was a facsimile, not the original.
 

 3.  On October 31 the State of Hawaii backed Martin’s assertion that there was an original, “typewritten, 1961” birth certificate, called a “Certificate of Live Birth” or “COLB” in Hawaii, that no one had previously seen. This certificate is not the same thing as a Birth Certificate so one still needs to be produced. 
 

4.  Hawaii officials refuted Obama’s false assertion.
 

 5.  In a Honolulu news conference on October 22nd Martin disclosed that Frank Marshall Davis was the biological father of Barack Obama, not Barack Obama senior as had been previously assumed. The Obama campaign has not denied Martin’s claim. Is this the same “Frank” that news reports talked about being a “father figure” to Obama when he moved back to Hawaii? I don’t know the answer to this question.
 

 6.  Frank Marshall Davis was a black Marxist who was a member of the Moscow-controlled Communist Party USA.
 

7.  Before he was born, BOs mother, Ann Dunham, married Obama, Sr., a Kenyan citizen. Before his birth she was denied entry onto the plane home to Hawaii due to her advanced pregnancy. Therefore, since she was only 18 at the time of Mr. Obama’s birth, she would not have passed citizenship on to her son. This is because, in 1961, citizenship could only be passed on to a child of an alien if the citizen-parent was 19 years old, and had resided in the U.S. for 10 years, five of those over the age of 14. Obviously, his mother did not meet this requirement.
 

8.  Sarah Obama, BO’s Kenyan grandmother has stated on a legally sworn affidavit, which was recorded in her home in Kenya, that she was in the room in Kenya Hospital when Obama was born.

  9.  An aunt, just “found” two weeks ago living here in the States in poverty under a deportation edict has also stated that he was born in Kenya. 
 

 10. When he was six years old, his mother, divorced from Obama Sr, moved to Indonesia and married Lolo Soetoro (Centero), an Indonesian citizen. Obama was evidently adopted by Soetoro and apparently became an Indonesian citizen. His name changed to Barry Soetoro and he was enrolled in an Indonesian school which required citizenship to attend.. His school admission papers have not been released.
 

 11. When Obama was twenty, he went to Pakistan on his Indonesian passport, which indicates that he was a citizen of Indonesia. At the time, Pakistan was a no travel zone for Americans. And, if I remember correctly, Indonesia did not allow duel citizenship until a few years ago. 

  12. Muammar Gadhafi, leader of Libya, has publicly claimed that Obama was born in Kenya and studied in Moslem schools in Indonesia.

  13. In the past, Obama “admitted” to holding citizenship in another country. The U.S. constitution forbids duel citizenship for a president.
 

 14. There are two men who took a law class under Obama who have recently agreed to testify on a legally sworn affidavit that he told the class he was a citizen of Indonesia.
 

 15. Months before the election, Philip J. Berg filed suit against Mr. Obama challenging him to produce his original birth certificate to prove he meets the constitutional requirements to serve as U.S. president.
 

16. Obama and the Democratic National Committee (which Berg was also suing) failed to produce the papers the court ordered them to. According to Rule # 36 of the Civil Procedure Code, if the charge is not answered, then the parties are assumed guilty.

threw the case out saying Berg was not personally injured by BO so he didn’t have legal standing before the Court, which in lay-man’s terms, means he had no right to bring such a case. Didn’t have the right?!!! Never mind that Berg is a certified lawyer, former PA State Deputy Attorney General with credentials out the kazoo! Doesn’t any American citizen have the right to see that our Constitution is upheld?!
So then, Berg filed a Writ of Certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court late in October, in an effort to force Mr. Obama to produce the documents.

  18. The U.S. Supreme Court has said that Mr. Obama, the DNC and all co-defendants are to respond to the writ, on or before Dec. 1.

  19. In the meantime, Allen Keys and Wiley Drake have filed a suit in California because, as people who ran for President and VP, they were personally injured by Obama running so their suit can’t be thrown out for the same reason as Berg’s was in Philadelphia. 

  20. If he, indeed, was a Kenyan or Indonesian citizen but is now a US citizen, where is his Certificate of US Citizenship? When he entered the US from Indonesia, it is assumed that he was granted a Certificate of Naturalization which would allow him to hold a state or federal level political office. But he would not be eligible to become President. Without such a Certificate, he is not even legal to hold the office of Senator. — 

21. What is his true citizenship? Why won’t he reveal his true situation and why is the DNC accommodating their candidate?   
 

 22. It is noteworthy to understand that Andy Martin is not a fan of John McCain so his efforts are not about political party. Philip Berg is a staunch Democrat and a card-carrying member of the NAACP. Both men simply want to see the Constitution upheld.
 

 23. As of 10/22/2008 there were lawsuits in eight states with lawsuits pending – Hawaii, Washington, California, Florida, Georgia. Pennsylvania, New York and Connecticut seeking judicial authority to force the certifying or decertifying of Senator Barack Obama’s qualification for President as a natural born U.S. citizen.
 

 24. Previously, two lawsuits failed to force the certifying documents from Obama. It would all be over if he’d just produce the paperwork!!!! Why won’t he?

  25. And why has the media been sitting on this? They would have never allowed it to go this far if he were a Republican.
 

 26. Prayer needs to be made that the Supreme Court act quickly on this case before the inauguration instead of years as is often the way it is with the Supreme Court.

I will readily admit that I deeply resent the fact that he is holding himself above the law and failing to comply with the simplest of requirements. He has said that he intends to change the Constitution of the United States and he is following through with that intention by failing to comply with it himself. Furthermore, I am greatly saddened to see so many intercessors and ministries ignore this very important point, praying as if Obama is already our President. We need their focused and concerted prayers for the resolution of all the lawsuits, the counting of the absentee and military ballots and the Electoral College. We stayed so focused in 2000 and 2004. Why aren’t we now? The election is NOT OVER!!!!!

As James Nesbit, IAPN Southern Il. Hub coordinator said a few days ago, “We still have 60 days to pray this thing down, bind up the spirit of Babylon and defeat it in Rahm Al Capone Emanuel and the chosen Chicago one, before they take over the power to destroy on Jan 20, 2009.”

God has given us time. Let’s get to work!

RaJean

P.S. Here’s a side note. Many are praying for Mr. Obama to have his eyes opened and his heart changed so that he can/will become a Christian. This is very commendable and biblical. But we need to remember that even if/when this happens, he would need TIME to change his thinking, doctrine, habits and influential friends before becoming a godly man capable of leading the free world. On the job training for such a position isn’t God’s best. In response to Israel’s insistence for a king – now! -God changed Saul in a day to become King. But root issues in his heart did not have time to be dealt with so he ended up fighting against the purposes of God.. When the Apostle Paul was converted he tried to jump immediately into ministry and it stirred up such opposition that the brethren sent him off to Tarsus in order to then have peace. (Acts 9:30-31) It took him three years of being willing to be out of the spot light before God deemed him worthy of getting back in there. (Galatians 1:18) And Paul was already well schooled in the Word of God. So as we pray for Obama, let’s make sure our prayers make sense biblically.

Another side note: Here is a quote from George and Jeannie Kirkpatrick for your consideration. 

 If Obama is not declared a United States born citizen, then several scenarios could happen. Biden could be declared President, or the election could be declared as a fraud, naming McCain as President.  Or a new election could be called for. Whatever the case, if Obama is declared ineligible to become President, this could cause riots in every city and state in the union.

The riots that would ensue would make the riots of the ‘60’s look like a picnic.  All these events would cause a national emergency, and President Bush could use this national emergency to enact all the executive orders passed over the last thirty years.  He would also be able to enact his National Security Presidential Directive signed into law, May 9, 2007.  This directive reads:

 “New legislation signed on May 9, 2007, declares that in the event of a “catastrophic event,” the President can take total control over the government and the country, bypassing all other levels of government at the state, federal, local, territorial and tribal levels, and thus ensuring total, unprecedented dictatorial power.”

 George Bush would have dictatorial powers over the whole United States. His power would be backed by the U.S. Army, the one million UN troops in this nation, and the use of Canadian armed forces used for crowd control.

 The final result would take us into a one-world government. The dollar would be replaced by the Amero, and we would live in a whole, new world.

 As God’s people, we need to renew our relationship with our Savior, Jesus Christ. He is, in reality, our only hope.”

Comments: Please feel free to add yours!

Comment 1  Gospel1951

This is good and it could all be very well true, but since the news media are not all over this and the prince is about to be crown king I don’t see it happening, oh I believe he will not be the legal president but I also know there are two many out their who want power in the DNC and have too much influence in our courts for this to go anywhere …. they will not give up their power now …. so this will all be swept under the nearest rug or deposited in the nearest grave and covered up…..

Comment 2    Jschulmansr

This could all be cleared up by Barak Obama producing his real genuine Birth Certificate

See this: Where’s the birth certificate?

By: Joseph Farah of World Net Dailey

Where’s the birth certificate?
 
 
 
 

 

Posted: November 17, 2008
1:00 am Eastern
© 2008 
 
 
 

 

 

Incredibly, we are just nine weeks away from inaugurating the next president of the United States and millions of Americans still have citizenship eligibility questions that have never been addressed by Barack Obama and his entourage. 

All that Barack Obama would have to do to put this issue to rest is to release his complete birth certificate, revealing where he was born and who were his parents. 

It seems a simple thing.

Personally, I doubt the Democratic Party would be so stupid as to run an ineligible candidate for president of the United States. I doubt Hillary Clinton would have accepted defeat at the hands of a candidate ineligible for the job.

So it would seem Obama is simply thumbing his nose at the Constitution and the concerns of millions of American people. After all, he has made it clear the Constitution doesn’t mean what it says anyway. It’s all a matter of opinion.

Maybe his intransigence on this seemingly ridiculous matter is just his way of showing he will, as president, consider himself above the Constitution. I don’t know any other way to interpret his behavior, do you?

Until last week, no one in the Obama camp would even comment on the controversy surrounding his complete birth certificate, which has never been released publicly. That changed after much hounding by WND staffers who managed to get one official Obama representative to proclaim – anonymously, I might add – that seven lawsuits filed by citizens trying to secure the birth certificate are “pure garbage.”

Obama’s record of non-cooperation and secrecy has now resulted in conspiracy theories that will plague him throughout his administration if he doesn’t address them now with utter transparence. Do I expect him to do so? No, I don’t.

He not only thinks those lawsuits are “garbage,” evidently that’s also what he thinks of the people who truly believe the Constitution means what it says and those who believe there ought to be some controlling legal authority determining Obama’s eligibility for the highest office in the land before he is sworn in Jan. 20.

Count me among those who really want to see that birth certificate now.

Imagine the level of secrecy we can expect from an Obama administration that guards his birth certificate with such tenacity.

I’m calling on Barack Obama today to release the entire birth certificate. And just so there is no mistake about what I am calling for, I want the part of the birth certificate that shows which hospital he was born in and who his parents were. That is the only way to establish if he is truly a natural-born citizen. Further, I am asking as a journalist and pundit that if there is any government agency or government official anywhere on the planet who has inspected the birth certificate and can provide those details to the American people, the time to do so is now.

I’m also calling on all my colleagues, from coast to coast and around the world, not to let this matter drop. Apparently it is a point of real sensitivity with Obama people. Good. Let’s rub it in. Let’s demand he produce the birth certificate at every turn – at every press conference, at every appearance, on every talk show.

Could anything be more important than enforcing the requirements of our Constitution?

This is hardly a laughing matter. The longer this soap opera drags on, the more suspicions it will raise – the less credibility our electoral system will have, the more many people will believe the whole political system is rigged.

Whom does that benefit?

I honestly can’t imagine.

What possible motivation could Obama have for not producing this simple, innocuous document that every citizen must produce to get a passport, driver’s license or Social Security card?

Are you curious?

So am I.

Where’s the birth certificate, Sen. Obama?

See this too: Supremes to review Barack’s citizenship
              Case challenging his name on ballot set for ‘conference’

By Bob Unruh of World Net Dailey

A case that challenges President-elect Barack Obama’s name on the 2008 election ballot citing questions over his citizenship has been scheduled for a “conference” at the U.S. Supreme Court.

 

 

Conferences are private meetings of the justices at which they review cases and decide which ones to accept for formal review. This case is set for a conference Dec. 5, just 10 days before the Electoral College is scheduled to meet to make formal the election of Obama as the nation’s next president.

The Supreme Court’s website listed the date for the case brought by Leo C. Donofrio against Nina Wells, the secretary of state in New Jersey, over not only Obama’s name on the 2008 election ballot but those of two others, Sen. John McCain and Roger Calero

The case, unsuccessful at the state level, had been submitted to Justice David Souter, who rejected it. The case then was resubmitted to Justice Clarence Thomas. The next line on the court’s docket says: “DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 5, 2008.”
If four of the nine justices vote to hear the case in full, oral argument may be scheduled.
The action questions whether any of the three candidates is qualified under the U.S. Constitution’s requirement that a president be a “natural-born citizen.”
According to America’s Right blogger Jeff Schreiber, there also was a development in a second case presented to the Supreme Court on the same issue.
His report said the Federal Election Commission now has waived its right to respond to a complaint brought by attorney Philip Berg.

“There are a number of reasons why the respondents here would choose not to respond. First, because the court only grants between 70 and 120 of the 8,000 or so petitions it receives every year, perhaps they just liked their odds of Berg’s petition getting denied. Second, because they have made arguments as to Berg’s lack of standing several times at the district court level and beyond, perhaps they felt as though any arguments had already been made and were available on the record. Or, perhaps the waiver shows that the FEC and other respondents do not take seriously the allegations put forth by Berg, and did not wish to legitimize the claims with a response,” the blogger speculated.

“Another thing which is not completely clear is whether the FEC is filing for itself or on behalf of all respondents,” he added.

“If it were just the FEC filing the waiver, I must say that I’m surprised,” Berg told America’s Right. “I’m surprised because I think they should take the position that the Supreme Court should grant standing to us. I think they have a responsibility not only to Phil Berg, but to all citizens of this country, to put forth a sense of balance which otherwise doesn’t seem to exist.

“However, if this was filed by the FEC on behalf of the DNC and Barack Obama too, it reeks of collusion,” he said, noting that the attorney from the Solicitor General’s office should be representing federal respondents and not the DNC or Obama.

But he noted that “questions surrounding this aspect of Obama’s candidacy are seemingly beginning to see the light of day.”

Just last week, WND reported on worries over a “constitutional crisis” that could be looming over the issue of Obama’s citizenship.

Former presidential candidate Alan Keyes and others filed a court petition in California asking the secretary of state to refuse to allow the state’s 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the 2008 presidential election until Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office.

The disputes all cite “natural-born citizen” requirement set by the U.S. Constitution.

WND senior reporter Jerome Corsi even traveled to Kenya and Hawaii prior to the election to investigate issues surrounding Obama’s birth. But his research and discoveries only raised more questions.

The biggest question is why Obama, if a Hawaii birth certificate exists as his campaign has stated, simply hasn’t ordered it made available to settle the rumors.

The governor’s office in Hawaii said there is a valid certificate but rejected requests for access and left ambiguous its origin: Does the certificate on file with the Department of Health indicate a Hawaii birth or was it generated after the Obama family registered a Kenyan birth in Hawaii?

Obama’s half-sister, Maya Soetoro, has named two different Hawaii hospitals where Obama could have been born. There have been other allegations that Obama actually was born in Kenya during a time when his father was a British subject.

The California action was filed by Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation on behalf of Keyes, the presidential candidate of the American Independent Party, along with Wiley S. Drake and Markham Robinson, both California electors.

“Should Senator Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America and, thereby, his election declared void, Petitioners, as well as other Americans, will suffer irreparable harm in that (a) usurper will be sitting as the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal,” the action challenges.

An Obama spokesman interviewed by WND described such lawsuits as “garbage.”

The popular vote Nov. 4 favored Obama over Sen. John McCain by several percentage points. But because of the distribution of the votes, Obama is projected to take the Electoral College vote, when it is held in December, by a 2-to-1 margin.

The California case states, “There is a reasonable and common expectation by the voters that to qualify for the ballot, the individuals running for office must meet minimum qualifications as outlined in the federal and state Constitutions and statutes, and that compliance with those minimum qualifications has been confirmed by the officials overseeing the election process,” the complaint said, when in fact the only documentation currently required is a signed statement from the candidate attesting to those qualifications.

“Since [the secretary of state] has, as its core, the mission of certifying and establishing the validity of the election process, this writ seeks a Court Order barring SOS from certifying the California Electors until documentary proof that Senator Obama is a ‘natural born’ citizen of the United States of America is received by her,” the document said.

“This proof could include items such as his original birth certificate, showing the name of the hospital and the name and the signature of the doctor, all of his passports with immigration stamps, and verification from the governments where the candidate has resided, verifying that he did not, and does not, hold citizenship of these countries, and any other documents that certify an individual’s citizenship and/or qualification for office.

The “certificate of live birth” posted by the Obama campaign cannot be viewed as authoritative, the case alleges.

“Hawaii Revised Statute 338-178 allows registration of birth in Hawaii for a child that was born outside of Hawaii to parents who, for a year preceding the child’s birth, claimed Hawaii as their place of residence,” the document said. “The only way to know where Senator Obama was actually born is to view Senator Obama’s original birth certificate from 1961 that shows the name of the hospital and the name and signature of the doctor that delivered him.”

The case also raises the circumstances of Obama’s time during his youth in Indonesia, where he was listed as having Indonesian citizenship. Indonesia does not allow dual citizenship, raising the possibility of Obama’s mother having given up his U.S. citizenship.

Any subsequent U.S. citizenship then, the case claims, would be “naturalized,” not “natural-born.”

WND has reported other challenges that have been raised in Ohio, Connecticut, Washington, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Hawaii.

Finally Try This! The Obama example

By Joseph Farah of World Net Dailey Between The Lines

Next time you move to another state and need a new driver’s license, try this: Refuse to produce the birth certificate or any other personal information required by the department of motor vehicles

 
 

Tell them: “I’m following the example of President-elect Barack Obama. If he didn’t need to produce a birth certificate to establish his eligibility to be president of the United States

 
 

 

 
 
See if it flies.

Your new employer requests a Social Security number he can provide the Internal Revenue Service so the federal government can be sure to grab its share of your money before you ever get a chance to touch it or see it, let alone spend it. Just explain that it would be an invasion of your privacy to give it to the company for identification purposes because your Social Security number was never intended for that purpose by act of Congress.

See if you get that job.

Better yet, all you illegal aliens out there, apply for any high-security government job. When the agency asks you to prove your citizenship

 
 
Tell them: “I’m following the example of President-elect Barack Obama. If he didn’t need to produce a birth certificate to any controlling legal authority to establish his eligibility to assume the highest office in the land, how dare you ask me to prove my eligibility for this lousy job?”
I don’t see how it can fail. Do you?

These are some of the thoughts going through my mind as I sit in bemusement at the prospect of the swearing in and inauguration of the next president two months from now – when a president-elect (assuming the Electoral College gives him the same kind of free pass election authorities and my colleagues in the “watchdog press” have given him to date) takes over the leadership of the executive branch of government.

At that point, those who subscribe to the theory that we have a “living Constitution,” one that means different things to different people at different times in history, will have experienced their crowning achievement – the induction of a president whose very eligibility for the office is questioned by millions of Americans who are told they don’t have any standing in courts to demand actual proof.

There are only three plausible explanations, I have been able to come up with, as to why Barack Obama steadfastly refuses to produce the portion of his alleged Hawaiian birth certificate that actually shows where he was born and when:

  • He doesn’t want to do so because he deliberately seeks to undermine the specific constitutional requirement.
  • He has something else to hide that would be revealed by making this document public – perhaps.
  • He can’t because it would show conclusively he was not born in a Hawaiian hospital.

Can anyone think of another reason?

I’ve put that challenge out there for millions of readers and not one has provided another possibility.

Yet, here we are – and here we go.

Personally, I think Barack Obama can establish his eligibility to be president. At the end of the day, I think we’ll learn the truth. But, in the meantime, the man likely to become the next president is sure providing a lousy example of openness, leadership and citizenship for the rest of us.

 

 

 

 

 

 

There’s just two months left before we witness one of the gravest attacks ever on the literal meaning of the U.S. Constitution.

Tell them: “I’m following the example of President-elect Barack Obama. If he didn’t need to produce a birth certificate to establish his eligibility to be president of the United States, surely you cannot require me to produce a Social Security card to be employed.”

 

Isn’t it fitting that a so-called “constitutional scholar” – a former law professor – will be the one to deliver this fateful blow?

 


 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • More
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...

Peter Schiff: Gold Will Rise, Dollar Will Collapse – Hard Assets Investors

19 Wednesday Nov 2008

Posted by jschulmansr in commodities, Copper, Currency and Currencies, deflation, Finance, gold, hard assets, inflation, Investing, investments, Latest News, Markets, mining stocks, precious metals, silver, U.S. Dollar, Uncategorized

≈ Comments Off on Peter Schiff: Gold Will Rise, Dollar Will Collapse – Hard Assets Investors

Tags

agricultural commodities, alternate energy, Austrian school, banking crisis, banks, bear market, Bollinger Bands, bull market, capitalism, central banks, China, Comex, commodities, communism, Copper, Currencies, currency, deflation, depression, diamonds, dollar denominated, dollar denominated investments, economic, economic trends, economy, financial, Forex, futures, futures markets, gold, gold miners, hard assets, heating oil, India, inflation, investments, market crash, Markets, mining companies, Moving Averages, natural gas, oil, palladium, physical gold, platinum, platinum miners, precious metals, price, price manipulation, prices, producers, production, protection, rare earth metals, recession, risk, run on banks, safety, Saudi Arabia, silver, silver miners, socialism, sovereign, spot, spot price, stagflation, Technical Analysis, timber, U.S. Dollar, volatility, warrants, Water

Peter Schiff: Gold Will Rise, Dollar Will Collapse – Features and Interviews – Hard Assets Investors 

Written by Administrator –  Hard Assets Investor

 

Norman: Let’s see the performance from this point forward; we’ll look back at this again and we’ll revisit this issue.

Let’s talk about something else, something that you have also … and I just mentioned it … the U.S. dollar. You were very, very negative. In the last month, we have seen unprecedented actions by the U.S. Fed in terms of expansion of the monetary basis; in other words, printing money … what you call printing money … and despite that, the dollar has remained incredibly strong.

How do you explain that according to your logic?

Schiff: Everything the government is doing is inherently negative for the dollar, and all of this…

Norman: It’s not playing out that way.

Schiff: It will; you’ve got to give it time.

I remember when I was on television talking about the subprime and people were telling me it’s no big deal, and I said, just wait a while; give it time.
Look, everything that we’re doing – all the bailouts, all the stimulus packages – this is all being financed by inflation. It’s inherently terrible for the dollar.

Norman: But you just said yourself that everything is deflating.

Schiff: But right now, Mike, you’re getting this de-leveraging, and this is benefitting the dollar, so despite the horrific fundamentals for the dollar, it’s going up anyway.
But ultimately, when this phony rally runs out of steam, the dollar is going to collapse, and that’s when we’re going to have a much greater crisis because now you’re going to have a collapsing dollar, which is going to push long-term interest rates up, commodity prices up.

Norman: I still don’t understand why the dollar is going to collapse. So you’re saying that the Fed is just going to allow … or leave this enormous amount of liquidity in there, that at some point down the road, if we recover, they’re not going Scto take it out?

Schiff: Look, they have no control over it. The Fed is trying to artificially reflate our phony economy, right?

We had this economy that was based on Americans borrowing money and then spending it on products. We have this huge debt finance bubble which is collapsing, and it’s being supported by foreigners.

But when this artificial demand for Treasuries goes away, the Fed is going to try to print a lot of money and the dollar is going to get killed.

Norman: All right; I’m going to ask you to hold on. Folks, check back because we’re going to do the second part of my interview with Peter Schiff, so check back to this site. This is Mike Norman; bye for now.

Mike Norman, HardAssetsInestor.com (Norman): Hello everybody, and welcome back for another installment of HardAssetsInvestor.com’s interview series. I’m Mike Norman, your host. Well, he’s back. Mr. Doom and Gloom is here … Peter Schiff, president of Euro Pacific Capital and author of the new book just out, “Bull Moves in Bear Markets.”Peter Schiff, president of Euro Pacific Capital (Schiff): “The Little Book …”Norman: “The Little Book …”; it’s in The Little Book Series. Well look … the last time you were here, things were kind of going your way, but it looks like things have turned upside down.
All kidding aside, I know your big thing over the last seven or eight years has been gold. We’re very supportive of gold on this show; we think that probably people should have some gold as part of their overall portfolio mix. But let’s just look at what happened.Several weeks ago, the U.S. stock market had its worst week in history … even going back to the 1930s … worst week in history. I saw a breakdown of various assets – all assets really – stocks, bonds, gold, commodities, oil. Gold was at the bottom of the list. The top-performing asset, and something that you hate, was the U.S dollar.So how do you explain that? If we are going through the worst economic and financial crisis in history – precisely what gold is supposed to protect against – why would it perform so bad?Schiff: Well, I think it will perform very well; you got to give it a little bit more time.Norman: More time or more decimation?

Schiff: No, what’s happening right now, Mike, is just de-leveraging, and so gold is going down for the same reason a lot of stocks are going down, a lot of commodities are going down. There’s a lot of leverage in this system, there’s a lot of margin calls, a lot of liquidation; a lot of people are having to sell whatever they own to pay off their debts.

Norman: But look at where the money is going … the money is going into U.S. sovereigns, Treasuries … it’s going into the U.S. dollar.

Schiff: For now.

Norman: Why for now?

Schiff: Right now there’s some perception of safety there, but it’s the opposite of the leveraging. If you’re selling your assets, you’re accumulating dollars; but ultimately right now, it’s like there’s been this gigantic nuclear explosion in the United States, and everybody is running toward the blast. Pretty soon they’re going to figure out they’re going in the wrong direction.

Norman: You always talk about gold as a currency, and we have seen currencies appreciate – the yen, for example, the dollar tremendously, for example, but gold has not held up.

Schiff: Well, if you actually look at gold versus other currencies, in the last couple of weeks gold has made new record highs in terms of the South African rand, the Canadian and Australian dollars … so gold was not doing as poorly as many of the currencies, and I think this is all short term.

I think you’re going to see a lot of money moving into gold, and if you look at how much gold has gone down from the peak, the peak was about a thousand … it’s off about 25%. Stocks are off 40%. Gold is still up during this year against the Dow.

Stay Tuned for Part II<!—-> of our interview with Peter Schiff.
 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • More
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Authors

  • jschulmansr's avatar jschulmansr
    • Free Crypto!
    • Free Crypto Currency
    • This is Blessed!
    • Trump Rally Charleston
    • Trump Rally Charleston

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Dare Something Worthy Today Too!
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Dare Something Worthy Today Too!
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d